Nope, why does it look like people are desperately looking to find something wrong with his testimony?
I'll believe there is meaningful legal and political accountability, within the ANC, when
all those who voted unanimously in favour of Zuma in Parliament, time and time again, while he was quite blatantly screwing this country like a friend's daughter - Answer for
that in a fair manner.
But no... He had to be voted out as president of the ANC first. Oh then... Suddenly there were, what?, 4 of them who voted against Zuma in parliament. Not that what happens in parliament matters. And, they were still publicly lambasted by a large portion of the ANC for it.
And then... Whoopsie. We can't have somebody who's not president of the ANC be president of the country. Out you go mister Zuma. ( the curtain falls down)
Look! It's a brand new ANC! Swear on me mum!
I mean let's be real here. It was thoroughly framed in a politically expedient manner, by a politician. Shall we neglect to call it seminal I wonder?
But let's forget fairness. Logic. All of it. To be frank. Leaving any idealism and philosophical concerns aside, the ANC already answered the question of why they acted in that manner at the time. They said: We are team ANC. And we do not vote with our conscience. We vote team ANC. And, in absolute, realistic terms, that's probably as good an answer as one can expect. But people must not then pretend that it was not the answer. It was the answer.
It is on the record.