Student wins R23m lawsuit

Christian is at present a law student at Unisa, but several experts, including psychologists and neurosurgeons, said in their opinion he had lost some of his intellectual abilities due to his injuries.
So lawyers do not need full cognitive capabilities? Explains a few things ...
 
The school was clearly negligent.
If I leave my child there I would expect them to make every effort to ensure his safety. The clearly did not do it in this case.

Agreed.. but in reality having 100's of kids running around a school it's impossible to stop all accidents. Kids needs to take responsibility too. He was in HIGH School. They were in a no-go zone, so they disobied the rules of the school. So now teachers have to watch every no-go, playgrounds, the stands/pavilion,bath rooms , bicycle storage, class rooms etc...?

What about kids smoking? Can the schools stop them? What about kids misbehaving ... schools can't do everything...

Only way to ENSURE safety is by putting the kids in the main hall and let them sit there during break. Then nothing will happen.
 
Last edited:
This sets a very very nasty example.

A: there is no way in hell I hope our schools can protect kids from there own stupidity. So you have an open gate to more claims that you can do nothing about.
B: this gonna hurt future education more than anything else, money has to come from somewhere and Education can only access their part of the budget, which comes from OUR tax money. More money for pay outs, less go into Teacher payrolls and actual teaching.
 
This girl's brother I know got burnt on his leg in a accident. The guy is happy as he was worried he would get retrenched before the accident but his company HR now has listed him as disabled so it improves their employment equity rating even though he works as a programmer and nothing is wrong with his mind

You can be classified as disabled and still have all your brain facilties in tact.

How serious are these burns, does it affect his walking in any way? To be listed as a disabled by your Company you have to get a Dr's "letter" to state and certify your disability. If this was done the correct way, this chap can get some benefits as well from SARS *wink*, but obviously there is paperwork involced...
 
This sets a very very nasty example.

A: there is no way in hell I hope our schools can protect kids from there own stupidity. So you have an open gate to more claims that you can do nothing about.
B: this gonna hurt future education more than anything else, money has to come from somewhere and Education can only access their part of the budget, which comes from OUR tax money. More money for pay outs, less go into Teacher payrolls and actual teaching.

My stupid question : Are there no type of "insurance cover" companies can take out if they, in this state Education Dept, get involved in law suits as these?
 
You can be classified as disabled and still have all your brain facilties in tact.

How serious are these burns, does it affect his walking in any way? To be listed as a disabled by your Company you have to get a Dr's "letter" to state and certify your disability. If this was done the correct way, this chap can get some benefits as well from SARS *wink*, but obviously there is paperwork involced...

No he can not.

Source: I am disabled as per EE, (Blind in one eye) but pay the same amount of tax on earning as everyone else.
 
And this is the other side of the coin...

This sets a very very nasty precedent.

A: there is no way in hell I hope our schools can protect kids from there own stupidity. So you have an open gate to more claims that you can do nothing about.
B: this gonna hurt future education more than anything else, money has to come from somewhere and Education can only access their part of the budget, which comes from OUR tax money. More money for pay outs, less go into Teacher payrolls and actual teaching.
 
My stupid question : Are there no type of "insurance cover" companies can take out if they, in this state Education Dept, get involved in law suits as these?

End of the day its still Tax money that is gonna get used.

Insurance needs a premium to be paid, Cover cost is based on risk. the higher the risks of payouts the more cover is gonna cost, its not like Insurance co's grow money.
 
Very bad court decision. We can expect this to result in the kind of ridiculous anti-play rules that have become commonplace in other countries because schools are terrified of being sued.
 
Am I missing something? How did they estimate how much he could've earned?

And what loss of income? He didn't work at the time.

It is an estimate of future earnings, or at least future earning potential. It is done by actuaries, not a complete thumb suck.

So lawyers do not need full cognitive capabilities? Explains a few things ...

Puts them on par with the IT guys :D

My stupid question : Are there no type of "insurance cover" companies can take out if they, in this state Education Dept, get involved in law suits as these?

Indemnity cover?
 
Great, so some of my taxes just got funneled into a shark tank.
I hope daddy's little darling chokes on a crayfish... can't stand people like this. :mad:
 
Wondering who funded the trial and appeal in the first place. It sets a good precedence though as schools are rife with bullying and since the parents can't manage their bully-kids, let the schools pay for it then.
 
So he is studying at law school. If he ends up living a normal life and earning a good salary, does he have to pay back the 23m with interest when he retires at 60?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X