Surtie Inheritance Scam

[PsyWulf]

I'll bite

You are correct. It is unlikely. The documentation that you and everybody else on your side of the argument have been calling for since this thread was started has been submitted to the High Court as part of an ongoing matter. Your assertion is that this documentation does not exist.

Nope,I do not assert that some documentation does not exist,in fact,i've perused what I could,just 1 ridiculous snippet below

The fact that it was submitted to the High Court to substantiate a claim opposes that theory (because in essence, that's what it is - a theory) vehemently.

Nah,High court submissions are an attempt at baffling with bullshit. See MTI case and thousands of pages of submitted evidence which was dismissed rightfully by the judge in the case as nonsense

also lies with you (albeit to a lesser degree).

Your PI was asked in an interview if he was aware of any crowdfunding for the case - he said no. I have no idea where in the hundreds of pages in this thread that was cited,it was a facebook post by Khoorbanally if memory serves

Next,i'll extract an excerpt of the "Evidence" presented by the "Forensic IT Investigator" as easy proof of the vexatious nonsense this case is built on:

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Now,let's see who knows a little about IT

Amusing as this ride has been,it's rehashing what has been established previously

 

[LandyMan]

Let me reply this way.
No im not aware of anything.
The point is that person will get x amount of money.
He is just like you and me, when there is money available. He will get his share, when he gets his money we will get out money.
SO THEY will make sure they do what they can, because they also want there money.
At this stage nobody has money, and im not talking about M................, AS FAR AS IT CONCERNS ME THEY ARE THE SCAMMERS HERE.
Anybody that gave them money can kiss it bey bey.......

No no, I am not asking if you are aware of anything. I asked you directly if you invested, like you said you did, if you have an agreement with the person who you gave your money to, that you will get this moerse payout?

 

[PsyWulf]

*snip*

Amusing as this ride has been,it's rehashing what has been established previously

My favourite part:

Based on the balance of probabilties with copious amounts of bullshit screenshots,bullshit whatsapp groups,bullshit payout dates,bullshit evidence and other miscellaneous bullshit i'm fairly confident the majority of the "claimants" are victims of a scam hinging on some minor hints of truths

Now based on this the onus on proving this is not the case hinges on proof of:
There are trillions available in the "account"
There was fundraising for the case
This fundraising was approved by the actual estate
There is a collective group for fundraising
You yourself are in this group
You yourself participated in this fundraising
You received a contract confirming as such
For donation of a few thousand you are eligible to receive millions

Now given you've confirmed you didn't participate - you may provide evidence from somebody who is a participant
If you cannot confirm each of these lines you are in no position to assert there is sufficient evidence to the contrary that this thread is not based on a scam

 

[dabean]

Now I need an Ethereal Adapter Card so I can cyber war drive to ABSA and MD5 hash their open ports

 

[PsyWulf]

Now I need an Ethereal Adapter Card so I can cyber war drive to ABSA and MD5 hash their open ports

I'm dying

It gets worse
If I remember right they snuck into an office or something in ABSA to do this - but they mention in the document none of this was collected illegally

Bitch please,i've been in the ABSA HO for red-team demos. If you plug in ANYTHING strange the netsec and security team swarms you in minutes

 

[Francois5141]

No no, I am not asking if you are aware of anything. I asked you directly if you invested, like you said you did, if you have an agreement with the person who you gave your money to, that you will get this moerse payout?

Yes and Yes.

 

[Speedster]

Yes and Yes.

That's fantastic. Could you post them for us? I'd love to catch a glimpse of those.

 

[LandyMan]

That's fantastic. Could you post them for us? I'd love to catch a glimpse of those.

Same here

 

[Francois5141]

That's fantastic. Could you post them for us? I'd love to catch a glimpse of those.

Lol, Don't think so.

 

[Speedster]

Lol, Don't think so.

What are you hiding? Or do we agree that those agreements don't exist.

 

[PsyWulf]

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Should anybody feel like perusing the chucklefest legal docs that were originally posted

 

[PsyWulf]

Lol, Don't think so.

 

[BusyNobody]

This is patently untrue. Any document submitted in court becomes part of the public record and is available to any member of the public.

I don't disagree. But are you alluding to or implying that if I wanted to hypothetically study the DNA report submitted by the prosecution in the hypothetical trial involving the murder of Julius Malema that all I'd need to do is submit a request to the clerk of the court and my request would be granted without delay? Or are you merely pointing out factual inconsistencies in my post?

Having that provision in the legal system and seeing it implemented in a South African court of law which exemplifies the prestigious service we enjoy as citizens are by no means the same thing.

 

[Francois5141]

How old are you ? 12

 

[BusyNobody]

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

Should anybody feel like perusing the chucklefest legal docs that were originally posted

You seem to be a logical person. From a logical perspective, how plausible do you think it is that the same documents submitted to the High Court by a professional legal team have been published on a Facebook page?

I've perused this waffle, and most of it doesn't even make sense. It comes across as the mad ramblings of an irrational individual.

I've also seen supposed screenshots of the WhatsApp statuses of a key individual that contradict the reality of what the estate's official legal team are trying to achieve. Meanwhile, the person whose name is used in these fake screenshots has remained quiet while they've been passed around in several WhatsApp groups.

But okay. Legal professionals are going to publish the gist of their legal argument on a Facebook page...

 

[BusyNobody]

Your PI was asked in an interview if he was aware of any crowdfunding for the case - he said no. I have no idea where in the hundreds of pages in this thread that was cited,it was a facebook post by Khoorbanally if memory serves

Not mine. I have no affiliation to this legal matter.

And wasn't this article in one of the same second-tier media webpages that was discredited by so many in this thread? Why do these comments hold substance now?

 

[Speedster]

You seem to be a logical person. From a logical perspective, how plausible do you think it is that the same documents submitted to the High Court by a professional legal team have been published on a Facebook page?

I've perused this waffle, and most of it doesn't even make sense. It comes across as the mad ramblings of an irrational individual.

I've also seen supposed screenshots of the WhatsApp statuses of a key individual that contradict the reality of what the estate's official legal team are trying to achieve. Meanwhile, the person whose name is used in these fake screenshots has remained quiet while they've been passed around in several WhatsApp groups.

But okay. Legal professionals are going to publish the gist of their legal argument on a Facebook page...

Let me say this again, documents submitted in court are part of the public record. Anyone can view them. Where are the documents you say were submitted?

 

[PsyWulf]

You seem to be a logical person. From a logical perspective, how plausible do you think it is that the same documents submitted to the High Court by a professional legal team have been published on a Facebook page?

I've perused this waffle, and most of it doesn't even make sense. It comes across as the mad ramblings of an irrational individual.

I've also seen supposed screenshots of the WhatsApp statuses of a key individual that contradict the reality of what the estate's official legal team are trying to achieve. Meanwhile, the person whose name is used in these fake screenshots has remained quiet while they've been passed around in several WhatsApp groups.

But okay. Legal professionals are going to publish the gist of their legal argument on a Facebook page...

Goalposts being shifted again

You are proposing that all of this was faked? "Faked fake evidence" ? Really? To what end?

This some secret Psy-op by ABSA?

Prove your assertions per the criteria I have specified earlier or ****off to the ignore list,these vague suppositions based on halftruths have worn out.

 

[Speedster]

How old are you ? 12

He's not the one scamming people here. I think you need to go do some soul searching and decide if you really want to live your life stealing from others who simply don't know better.

 

[PsyWulf]

Not mine. I have no affiliation to this legal matter.

And wasn't this article in one of the same second-tier media webpages that was discredited by so many in this thread? Why do these comments hold substance now?

Your supposition.

Indeed,but if I am forced to give benefit of the doubt to any evidence,then I will use any of that evidence to prove or disprove its arguments. The reply was on facebook too from Koorbanally - unless you imply that is also part of a psy-op?