Survey on mixed marriages

Ekhaatvensters said:
thats because we had the technology to do so.. there were tons of tribal wars in Africa at the time, imagine if they had wepons and technology like cars and ships. It could easily have been much worse than Europe, so I dont htink its much of a comparison, anyway it could be completley flawed, noone know what went on in Africa before it was colonised.. oh except the africans but they couldnt really write.. damn..
True - we cannot know what Africans would have done with the same technology... I am basing my observation on what can be historically demonstrated, not what might have been. Written history or not - Africans could not have, because of technology as you mention, wrought as much violence and carnage on others as Westerners did.
 
Last edited:
Ekhaatvensters said:
thats because we had the technology to do so.. there were tons of tribal wars in Africa at the time, imagine if they had wepons and technology like cars and ships. It could easily have been much worse than Europe, so I dont htink its much of a comparison, anyway it could be completley flawed, noone know what went on in Africa before it was colonised.. oh except the africans but they couldnt really write.. damn..
At least Africans didn't export their wars to other parts of the globe like the westerners.
 
ignacio said:
True - we cannot know what Africans would have done with the same technology... I am basing my observation on what can be historically demontrated, not what might have been. Written history or not - Africans could not have, because of technology as you mention, wrought as much violence and carnage on others as Westerners did.

Ekhaatvensters said:
thats because we had the technology to do so.. there were tons of tribal wars in Africa at the time, imagine if they had wepons and technology like cars and ships. It could easily have been much worse than Europe, so I dont htink its much of a comparison, anyway it could be completley flawed, noone know what went on in Africa before it was colonised.. oh except the africans but they couldnt really write.. damn..
Uhm they would never have had the technology, Fact 2000 years ago ships were sailing, where was Africa, Yet they were before everyone in the world. Had no interest or need neither the skills to do the required development!

Whos fault was that!

Now they have the technology, bought or whatever! What do the do with it in Africa,

Now who's fault is that!

Could not really write
?

Now who's fault is that!


(All Off topic off course}
 
Angelo said:
At least Africans didn't export their wars to other parts of the globe like the westerners.

That could have been because they didn't have the means to, but what does any of this have to do with mixed marriages?

On topic: it can hardly be a surprise or even news that most people prefere to marry within their race. I mean, most people prefere to marry within their culture or religion, never mind race.
 
icyrus said:
That could have been because they didn't have the means to, but what does any of this have to do with mixed marriages?

On topic: it can hardly be a surprise or even news that most people prefere to marry within their race. I mean, most people prefere to marry within their culture or religion, never mind race.

But today if you want to be IN,step out with another race,or even marry outside your race group,just to show ppl how liberal and open minded you are.
 
ajak said:
But today if you want to be IN,step out with another race,or even marry outside your race group,just to show ppl how liberal and open minded you are.

Surely we are way past that - its so... nineties!
 
JungleFacedJake said:
He is sadly not a person of his word.
And sadly you cannot read english! I am not ON THE TOPIC I am OFF TOPIC why would I give the fools right of way because they want it. This thread went Off TOPIC thanks!
 
ajak said:
But today if you want to be IN,step out with another race,or even marry outside your race group,just to show ppl how liberal and open minded you are.
How far do these PPL want to go, now it is marriage with same sex! (Not race related at all)
 
icyrus said:
That could have been because they didn't have the means to.

How did the rest of the world developed "the means to" but the "fathers" of the human race did not or could not? They only started to catch up 400 years ago! (Only an Off Topic Question related to what Ignacio and FunnyFace raised here!)
 
ajak said:

The farmers have been buggering the slaves a LONG time ago Ajak :).

The first person in S.A who was prosecuted under the Immorality Act was an NG dominee who bonked his domestic ... his neighbours formed a mob and apparantly tore down the garage where the dirty deed took place :).

Black or white ... they are all feel and look and taste the same to me :).
 
tibby.dude said:
The farmers have been buggering the slaves a LONG time ago Ajak.

The first person in S.A who was prosecuted under the Immorality Act was an NG dominee who bonked his domestic ... his neighbours formed a mob and apparantly tore down the garage where the dirty deed took place.

Black or white ... they are all feel and look and taste the same to me :).
:D (Still Off topic)Typical Zuma attitude They are not all the same, you could get the dreaded disseases, but then morality means nothing in some cultures. Just take a shower and you will be saved! (Applies for all races) :D
 
tibby.dude said:
The farmers have been buggering the slaves a LONG time ago Ajak :).

The first person in S.A who was prosecuted under the Immorality Act was an NG dominee who bonked his domestic ... his neighbours formed a mob and apparantly tore down the garage where the dirty deed took place :).

Black or white ... they are all feel and look and taste the same to me :).

LOL @ tibby.dude!
:D
 
tibby.dude said:
The farmers have been buggering the slaves a LONG time ago Ajak :).

The first person in S.A who was prosecuted under the Immorality Act was an NG dominee who bonked his domestic ... his neighbours formed a mob and apparantly tore down the garage where the dirty deed took place :).
:).
:D LOL! Wouldn't be surprised if many of the people opposed to this are "doing it" behind closed doors.
 
Punani is still punani when you turn out the lights, what does skin colour matter ;)
Jokes aside, one has to question the people who disagree with it, are you marrying the person or are you marrying their skin colour?
 
WTF? Anyone who has to butt in to the private lives (marraige and such) of other people is verkrampt and they are the ones needing a life. If a met a black lady I liked I'd go out with her, the only reason I dont is cause I hardly find any women I like these days.

Anyone who gives me crap about how its a sin, well they didn't pray this morning or over their meal, maybe they didn't give 10% to the church, all of us are sinners so dont you dare cast a stone.
 
tibby.dude said:
The farmers have been buggering the slaves a LONG time ago Ajak :).

The first person in S.A who was prosecuted under the Immorality Act was an NG dominee who bonked his domestic ... his neighbours formed a mob and apparantly tore down the garage where the dirty deed took place :).

Black or white ... they are all feel and look and taste the same to me :).
So you are saying the farmers/boers were gay
bug·ger 1 Pronunciation (bgr, bg-)
n.
1. Vulgar Slang A sodomite.
2. Slang A contemptible or disreputable person.
3. Slang A fellow; a chap: "He's a silly little bugger, then" John le Carré.
v. bug·gered, bug·ger·ing, bug·gers Vulgar Slang
v.intr.
To practice sodomy
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X