Until the change this month took place, I was doing route-splitting on my server with the extra 30GB of unthrottled local on my 3 x 20GB TelkomInternet accounts. By doing this I could get through a month without bandwidth trouble, and without requiring uncapped. I can't do that any longer as, now once one of those accounts reaches cap, EVERYTHING is reduced to 384k speeds + no access to youtube, so at that point the account basically becomes useless for my practical use and I switch to another. Problem is I don't have much option anymore with these existing Telkom packages I have - I've run out of bandwidth this month apart from these equally soft-capped accounts... so from this change it would seem Telkom want to squeeze me even more, in a time where we thought they were supposedly embarking on opening up their network for the likes of IPTV etc - seems like a regress going back to the concept of saturating their network to a standstill on the first day of every month, only to have ample surplus bandwidth on the network by the end of the month? Somehow I feel the shaping doesn't have to be as intense as it is :/
I realise that this new option is better for most subscribers who would prefer a trickle of international to ONLY fast local, but for me personally, after experiencing just 10 minutes of being soft-capped, I've realised that I'm going to have to drop 2 of those 3 TelkomInternet accounts I own, and switch to an uncapped account with another well-known ISP. Unless Telkom/ranger can provide information that Telkom may still consider keeping local unthrottled over and above the 384k international once a user reaches their blended quota, then by month end I'll have made the switchover