lol no, I want it running directly to my house

That will not happen anyway, so why not try to save cost on security by upgrading their network in the high risk areas. Yes it is generally in the low density areas, but you have to start somewhere. Imagine cutting those security budgets by 2 or 3 mil / month and use those funds to start upgrading the networks bit by bit. As they progress the security savings should increase and therefore accelerate the saving, which in turn can accelerate the laying of fibre. S
I know that is a rather simplistic view, but is less not more in some cases? Sure the crims will move to a different area, but it will probably be harder for them to steal the cables and therefore less cables will be stolen.
Point is money is being spent, besides the cost to security, there is the cost of replacing the copper once it is stolen. Why not rather spend that fortune on removing the problem entirely.