Rulings like this force cultures to melt down and change. It is not unacceptable to one part of society, but because we live in a multicultural society and multi-faith society many folks have to back down or quiet down on stuff they don't necessarily find offensive for the sake of the sensitivities of others. Sometimes it is a good thing, but more often than not I think it is bad.
Please explain how it's bad not to piss more Muslims off?
I'll give you this.
Yes if Islamic Armies march on the West, the West will stand up and fight back. However that is not happening. What is happening is that a possibly small group of extremists can take things to extremes and they can use any pretext to gain support. At the same time we rely on many Muslims in countries like Afganistan, Egypt, Turkey, Iraq, Emirates, Malaysia,
etc to stand with us against the forces of extremism.
So we don't want to piss them off. If that means no Muhammed Jokes or cartoons - I'll give you a clue here - I REALLY DON'T CARE.
If Richard Dawkins or another idiot like Salman Rushdie gets gagged
I REALLY DON'T CARE. I really don't see insulting Islamists as an expression
of freedom of speech, because I don't have a problem with Islamists.
If they come after me - I will defend myself or if they attack my country
I will support a response but they are not doing that at present and I have
no interest in escalating things to that.
So Antowan, while you may want your Islamic cartoons with your morning coffee and call it freedom of speech I don't find sense in that satire nor entertainment and I certainly don't see a need to endager my life or my
well being for the sake of some publisher's profits.
And no LIBERTY or DEATH does not apply here. We have liberty and we can mock Muslims but I choose not to excercise that because I have no interest in doing so. Honestly. Thank you.