Testing from different ISP`s

[dotnerd]

Hi people,

To help me decide which ISP im gonna take i want to ask if some of the u sers here can help me test a few things.

First i looked at what im gonna use my inet for exactly, this would be playing WoW and leeching from my servers located in NL. I would also concider setting up a VPN with my serverpark in NL.

Can i ask the users here if they could provide me with ping stats and traceroute information, and the ofcourse clearly state their ISP used whilst doing this ? This would help a lot

I have the following sources we can use there. (Both located in NL but different networks.)

195.22.103.33
81.171.102.12

Time: 07:42
ISP: Satelite from work ;-)

PING: 81.171.102.12
Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=204ms TTL=51
Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=51
Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=51
Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=51

Tracert 81.171.102.12

I cant post a full tracert here due to the fact that im at work and some of the info is confidential. But i can post a sample traceroute from 2 of my servers.

v***@brutus:~$ traceroute eweka.nl
traceroute to eweka.nl (81.171.102.12), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 gigabit.globalswitch.icehosting.nl (195.22.103.1) 0.260 ms 0.184 ms 0.107 ms
2 nl-ix.openpeering.nl (82.150.153.129) 0.604 ms 3.221 ms 0.611 ms
3 openpeering.eweka.nl (82.150.153.198) 0.862 ms 0.720 ms 0.738 ms
4 10ge-6-3.whw-core-1.eweka.nl (81.171.73.181) 1.361 ms 1.596 ms 1.360 ms
5 ge-1-1.ge-1-2.whw-colo-1.eweka.nl (81.171.73.138) 0.988 ms 1.470 ms 1.488 ms
6 service.eweka.nl (81.171.102.12) 1.490 ms 1.473 ms 1.362 ms
v***@brutus:~$


PING: 195.22.103.33
Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=50
Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=50
Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=204ms TTL=50
Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=204ms TTL=50


So please see if you can get round to this, your information is very valuable to me. Especially the non IS providers

 

[xdsluser]

XDSL 1024 75/25 Split uncapped

Pinging 81.171.102.12 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=193ms TTL=52
Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=52
Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=52
Reply from 81.171.102.12: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=52

Pinging 195.22.103.33 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=197ms TTL=52
Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=52
Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=52
Reply from 195.22.103.33: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=52


Tracing route to eweka.nl [81.171.102.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms broadband.xdsl.co.za [192.168.24.1]
2 13 ms 15 ms 15 ms 41.223.62.1
3 13 ms 13 ms 13 ms 209.212.121.249
4 15 ms 14 ms 13 ms rb-ad-1--jp-ia-1-a.mtnns.net [196.44.8.172]
5 16 ms 16 ms 22 ms jp-cr-1--jp-cr-2-a.mtnns.net [196.44.31.46]
6 14 ms 16 ms 13 ms rb-cr-2--jp-cr-1-a.mtnns.net [196.44.31.207]
7 17 ms 14 ms 15 ms rb-nt-1--rb-cr-2-a.mtnns.net [196.44.31.26]
8 184 ms 187 ms 188 ms lt-cr-1.uk--rb-cr-1.za-a.mtnns.net [196.44.31.1]
9 190 ms 183 ms 187 ms lt-tpr-1--lt-cr-1-a.uk.mtnns.net [209.212.111.129]
10 188 ms 203 ms 189 ms 339.ge-1-3-2.mpr1.lhr2.uk.above.net [213.152.230.89]
11 187 ms 186 ms 186 ms rtr-1-1ge.linx.rb-ldn.eweka.nl [195.66.224.227]
12 190 ms 196 ms 196 ms rtr-1-1ge.core.rb-ams.eweka.nl [81.171.102.197]
13 227 ms 194 ms 192 ms ge-1-1.ge-1-2.whw-colo-1.eweka.nl [81.171.73.138]
14 193 ms 196 ms 195 ms service.eweka.nl [81.171.102.12]

 

[dotnerd]

Thanks xdsluser. Doesnt seem all to bad

Im really looking for one from Imagine-IPS so if any users out there have dsl fromt hem pls help meout here

 

[xdsluser]

Pleasure. What are you hosting on your servers in NL?

 

[dotnerd]

Its basically the low maintenance part of my company. All managed machines (newscluster, webcluster and a few gameservers) so nothing spectacular
But i have to be able to connect via same VPN else i cant do anything on them

EDIT:

@XDSLUSER:

As one can see in the traceroute that youve pasted above you guys use MTN Network Solutions as a uplink provider. Which does not go via sat but via fibre, acress the ocean that is. This does result is a dramatic difference in latency`s. Which is what we all want ;-)

The one thing that i dont like is the way you split the traffic , the whole 25/75 thing. I mean ill be doing most of my business on Int. grounds and barely anything local. Ive called XDSL sales and asked them to work out something more to my likes, but apparantly 100% INT is not possible. /cries

 

[Tinuva]

That is one damn interesting traceroute. I like how the pings are really really low, good for international gaming I'd say.