Texting while driving, this has to stop

What kind of a hands free kit requires you to hold the phone... in your hands? :wtf:

She would need to find the contact and dial, at one stage every phone came with a wired hands free kit:


oem-blackberry-wired-stereo-headset-hands-free-81573rim--3-5mm-plug-.jpg
 
Sigh... regardless of whether its your intent or not, the irony is still there...

Anyway, so you want to give him his own medicine? What exactly did the OP do that is so bad? Last time I checked reporting potentially dangerous driving habits to the company that owns the vehicle is a good thing. Sure, maybe doing it this publicly wasnt the best idea, but the OP claimed to have not been able to find alternative avenues to lodge his complaint. Or are you going after the OP for hypocrisy (which you are also guilty of in this very thread, and undoubtedly at several points in your life as well)? What exactly is it that warrants your behaviour?



You do realise that insulting someone makes it less likely that they will engage with you right?

No, irony is normally not intentional? But lets not go off on a tangent at present. I must admit I am a bit disappointed in you as it's clear you have not really read the thread and it seems I have to repeat myself again...again. Let me try and do a short hand version:

- Agreed one should not text and drive
- But thought it was a bit harsh to publish photo on large forum and notify employers
- Others actually postulated that photo looks a bit dodge in that damsel may not have been driving but stopped at side of road
- then OP admitted to having done same thing in the past (texting while driving) as well as currently still engaging in this practice
- OP also seemed to have a hidden agenda with Motorite with damsel merely collateral damage
- OP actually got an invitation to contact Motorite and then just went AWOL in terms of letting us know what happened next


I am not sure where I have been hypocritical in this thread? But in general terms, I am sure I have been guilty of this in the past but it is something I strive to avoid personally. As for what warrants my behaviour? Why, the same thing that motivates you to try and undermine my little crusade. I would call this irony :)

And you do realise that the lack of response was evident way before any "insulting" commenced?
 
Oh yes - one of my main points of contention was that the woman might get into severe trouble in her work due to the OP's contacting her employer. Surely the easiest way for the OP to debunk my stance would be to let us know what actually happened to her when (if) he contacted the financial director? Surely........?
 
- But thought it was a bit harsh to publish photo on large forum and notify employers
Why?
- Others actually postulated that photo looks a bit dodge in that damsel may not have been driving but stopped at side of road
Irrelevant, its still illegal if your vehicle is stationary and the engine is running
- then OP admitted to having done same thing in the past (texting while driving) as well as currently still engaging in this practice
Irrelevant, its still illegal, and you can still report people for crimes you have yourself committed. Its hypocritical sure, but I'd rather have a bunch of hypocrites reporting crimes/traffic violations than nobody reporting anything for fear of being called a hypocrite
- OP also seemed to have a hidden agenda with Motorite with damsel merely collateral damage
You seem to have a hidden agenda against bdt... see how that works, making your argument seem less valid while I have only thrown out a baseless statement, which I can sort of backup by referencing your stalker behaviour. But real or not, its mostly irrelevant because the lady in the picture is still in the wrong
- OP actually got an invitation to contact Motorite and then just went AWOL in terms of letting us know what happened next
I'll be sure to read the thread surrounding this event.

As for what warrants my behaviour? Why, the same thing that motivates you to try and undermine my little crusade. I would call this irony :)

Please, do not sully your name with psychic claims, I doubt my motivation is the same as yours. So again I must ask, what is your motivation, what are you trying to achieve here?

And you do realise that the lack of response was evident way before any "insulting" commenced?

The point still stands... You claim to want to interact with the person, but insult him often. Thats called being counter productive
 
Why?
Irrelevant, its still illegal if your vehicle is stationary and the engine is running
Irrelevant, its still illegal, and you can still report people for crimes you have yourself committed. Its hypocritical sure, but I'd rather have a bunch of hypocrites reporting crimes/traffic violations than nobody reporting anything for fear of being called a hypocrite
You seem to have a hidden agenda against bdt... see how that works, making your argument seem less valid while I have only thrown out a baseless statement, which I can sort of backup by referencing your stalker behaviour. But real or not, its mostly irrelevant because the lady in the picture is still in the wrong
I'll be sure to read the thread surrounding this event.



Please, do not sully your name with psychic claims, I doubt my motivation is the same as yours. So again I must ask, what is your motivation, what are you trying to achieve here?



The point still stands... You claim to want to interact with the person, but insult him often. Thats called being counter productive

I'm sorry, but where exactly is my hidden agenda against bdt? I don't know how much clearer an agenda could be????? You seem a bit slow on the uptake? But, again, let me tell you what my position/agenda is with bdt:

I find his behaviour detestable. Hypocritical. I wish to teach him a lesson - with my "ironic" crusade against him. I also want to find out what happened. I believe this also answers your question as to what my motivation is - again, I thought it was pretty darn clear from a number of previous posts?

As for what you deem irrelevant, well, this is where we divurge and it seems there is little point in debating it. I disagree with you; you disagree with me.

As for your standing point - well, let's let it stand then....
 
Spunkywunky1, you do realise that bdt has probably unsubscribed from this thread and is not even aware of your stupid, childish crusade against him? I'll be unsubscribing too because your arrogant , condescending, self-satisfying and pompous posts are annoying beyond belief. I wish the mods would just close this thread and be done with it. The woman was talking on her phone while driving in public, therefore bdt had every right to post the picture on a public forum. You are not teaching anyone a lesson except how to be a douchbag.
 
I'm sorry, but where exactly is my hidden agenda against bdt? I don't know how much clearer an agenda could be????? You seem a bit slow on the uptake

Lol, I was proving a point, and you just reinforced it :D I said something that was mostly baseless (I did say that in my post) and look at how its riled you up, it even got you throwing some more insults around. Epic.

I find his behaviour detestable. Hypocritical. I wish to teach him a lesson - with my "ironic" crusade against him. I also want to find out what happened. I believe this also answers your question as to what my motivation is - again, I thought it was pretty darn clear from a number of previous posts?

Teach someone a lesson, and find out what happened. Ok. You realise that the former is nigh impossible to accomplish on a forum right (nevermind when you are trying to do it in a derogatory manner), you may as well go chasing windmills? Which leaves the latter, and you keep insulting the OP, so the likelihood of his return is also approaching nil. From my perspective, you're just being silly now. Sometimes its better to just leave a thread having made your point, and call it a day.

As for what you deem irrelevant, well, this is where we divurge and it seems there is little point in debating it. I disagree with you; you disagree with me.

I gave reasons why I deem certain points irrelevant. If all you can say is you disagree thats a bit sad. Surely you also have reasons for your opinion?

And you didnt even answer me as to why you "thought it was a bit harsh to publish photo on large forum and notify employers"
I am disappointed, this is not the robust debate you spoke of earlier
 
Lol, I was proving a point, and you just reinforced it :D I said something that was mostly baseless (I did say that in my post) and look at how its riled you up, it even got you throwing some more insults around. Epic.



Teach someone a lesson, and find out what happened. Ok. You realise that the former is nigh impossible to accomplish on a forum right (nevermind when you are trying to do it in a derogatory manner), you may as well go chasing windmills? Which leaves the latter, and you keep insulting the OP, so the likelihood of his return is also approaching nil. From my perspective, you're just being silly now. Sometimes its better to just leave a thread having made your point, and call it a day.



I gave reasons why I deem certain points irrelevant. If all you can say is you disagree thats a bit sad. Surely you also have reasons for your opinion?

And you didnt even answer me as to why you "thought it was a bit harsh to publish photo on large forum and notify employers"
I am disappointed, this is not the robust debate you spoke of earlier

Archer, dude, your intellect is not as fearsome as you imagine :)

It wasn't an insult - you did seem slow to grasp things that were pretty clearly posted. A case in point - you say I didn't answer you why I thought it was harsh to contact her employers? How many times have I posted that I was concerned on the impact on her career and that therefore her "crime" did not justify the (potential) punishment?

In addition, were your posts not trying to teach me a lesson of some sort? But before I claim to be psychic, what was your motivation then?

And as they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery (you being disappointed in me).
 
Spunkywunky1, you do realise that bdt has probably unsubscribed from this thread and is not even aware of your stupid, childish crusade against him? I'll be unsubscribing too because your arrogant , condescending, self-satisfying and pompous posts are annoying beyond belief. I wish the mods would just close this thread and be done with it. The woman was talking on her phone while driving in public, therefore bdt had every right to post the picture on a public forum. You are not teaching anyone a lesson except how to be a douchbag.

nyaaa, nyaaa...... :)

hehehe - sorry man, I have often been told I have a very arrogant posting style. It is what it is and I am what I am. But then, based on your viewpoint, should the OP not be taking pictures of himself texting while driving and handing them over to the police?

(extreme I know, but couldn't resist making this post.....)
 
It wasn't an insult - you did seem slow to grasp things that were pretty clearly posted. A case in point - you say I didn't answer you why I thought it was harsh to contact her employers? How many times have I posted that I was concerned on the impact on her career and that therefore her "crime" did not justify the (potential) punishment?
Aren't you the one the grasped the fact that I have not read this entire thread? Did you all of a sudden forget that, or is selective memory the order of the day?

In addition, were your posts not trying to teach me a lesson of some sort? But before I claim to be psychic, what was your motivation then?

I'm literally only here because you have irritated me, I've easily stayed out of this mess of a thread until today. Its childish and petty but today I can afford to waste time. Most days I would happily be on my way, having simply added you to my non interaction list (like I'm sure most people have already done). If I teach you a lesson, great, buts its far from being my primary goal. Its far more fun making you make a fool of yourself (which I've already done - mission accomplished)

Anyway, so you were afraid this lady would be punished in some manner. Isn't that exactly what should happen when you break the law? :wtf: (note: you've probably answered this already, but in case you forgot again, I havent read the whole thread, I dont have that much spare time)

edit: in addition, the (potential) severity of the punishment is not up to bdt, so none of that lies with him, he only reported the incident. The punishment is entirely up to her employers, over whom (I assume) bdt has no sway over unless he is Professor X or something.
 
Last edited:
Aren't you the one the grasped the fact that I have not read this entire thread? Did you all of a sudden forget that, or is selective memory the order of the day?



I'm literally only here because you have irritated me, I've easily stayed out of this mess of a thread until today. Its childish and petty but today I can afford to waste time. Most days I would happily be on my way, having simply added you to my non interaction list (like I'm sure most people have already done). If I teach you a lesson, great, buts its far from being my primary goal. Its far more fun making you make a fool of yourself (which I've already done - mission accomplished)

Anyway, so you were afraid this lady would be punished in some manner. Isn't that exactly what should happen when you break the law? :wtf: (note: you've probably answered this already, but in case you forgot again, I havent read the whole thread, I dont have that much spare time)

edit: in addition, the (potential) severity of the punishment is not up to bdt, so none of that lies with him, he only reported the incident. The punishment is entirely up to her employers, over whom (I assume) bdt has no sway over unless he is Professor X or something.

Actually, you didn't admit to not having read the thread. But thanks then for this admission i.e. you basicaly haven't known what you are talking about, as is evident from your posts. And you also admit your agenda was similar to mine then? In that a poster annoyed you and you decided to get involved and teach them a "lesson"? Thats funny.....

And it seems I have dragged you down to my level in respect of distributing insults. Would you call that hypocritical after you trying to lecture me on this topic? Oh, and the, "I'm part of a group who will ignore you from now on, nyaa, nyaa" would be a pretty strong definition of childishness to me.

And seeing as you have been able to make more than 14000 posts on this forum I struggle with your claim that you have little spare time.
 
Spunky, some food for thought:

1) Each time you post in this thread, you increase its Google page ranking.
2) Post enough times and this thread will be the top result when someone searches for "motorite".
3) When someone clicks on this thread from Google, the OP shows up.
4) Not many people will read this far into the thread.

Therefore, you're actually doing more harm than good for the poor little lady in the OP.
 
Spunky, some food for thought:

1) Each time you post in this thread, you increase its Google page ranking.
2) Post enough times and this thread will be the top result when someone searches for "motorite".
3) When someone clicks on this thread from Google, the OP shows up.
4) Not many people will read this far into the thread.

Therefore, you're actually doing more harm than good for the poor little lady in the OP.

The harm has been done already, I would say?
 
Actually, you didn't admit to not having read the thread. But thanks then for this admission i.e. you basicaly haven't known what you are talking about, as is evident from your posts. And you also admit your agenda was similar to mine then? In that a poster annoyed you and you decided to get involved and teach them a "lesson"? Thats funny.....

Again, I'm here to let you make a fool of yourself, which you carry on doing rather succesfully.
And I have admit that I havent read the entire thread, I know more than enough to know how silly you have been in here

And it seems I have dragged you down to my level in respect of distributing insults. Would you call that hypocritical after you trying to lecture me on this topic? Oh, and the, "I'm part of a group who will ignore you from now on, nyaa, nyaa" would be a pretty strong definition of childishness to me.

Yes, it is I who admits I'm behaving in a petty manner. Does it make you feel better repeating what I have already admitted? lol

And seeing as you have been able to make more than 14000 posts on this forum I struggle with your claim that you have little spare time.

Lets see
I had lots of free time before (roughly) November 2012. Now I do not since I am working for a different client. Would you like to continue discussing how much free time I have? Will you be able to back it up with facts, or just your usual deflection and poor attempts at trolling me? Heck you could just go to my profile and see that lately my posts per day are quite low, whereas in the past 100+ per day was easy. But hey, dont let that stop you from insinuating that I'm a liar. You clearly know more about my daily routine from a number on my profile than I do :rolleyes:

Finally, dont worry, I havent let you sidetrack me with all the above foolishness. I am still eagerly awaiting your reason on why bdt is to blame for any potential punishment the lady may have received. Heck, I'm still waiting on why the lady should not have suffered any consequences.
 
And after reading my post, do you not see how you're making it worse?

No man, it doesn't work like that. If she was going to get into trouble it would have happened already. She cant get additional charges brought against her just because people are posting about it or get to see it now....
 
Again, I'm here to let you make a fool of yourself, which you carry on doing rather succesfully.
And I have admit that I havent read the entire thread, I know more than enough to know how silly you have been in here



Yes, it is I who admits I'm behaving in a petty manner. Does it make you feel better repeating what I have already admitted? lol



Lets see
I had lots of free time before (roughly) November 2012. Now I do not since I am working for a different client. Would you like to continue discussing how much free time I have? Will you be able to back it up with facts, or just your usual deflection and poor attempts at trolling me? Heck you could just go to my profile and see that lately my posts per day are quite low, whereas in the past 100+ per day was easy. But hey, dont let that stop you from insinuating that I'm a liar. You clearly know more about my daily routine from a number on my profile than I do :rolleyes:

Finally, dont worry, I havent let you sidetrack me with all the above foolishness. I am still eagerly awaiting your reason on why bdt is to blame for any potential punishment the lady may have received. Heck, I'm still waiting on why the lady should not have suffered any consequences.

Archie, I think it's just your ego making you continue posting now. You havent read the thread, yet you know I'm wrong and making a fool of myself? Foolish statement don't you think? Or are you saying your opinion is infallible? And accusing me of deflection. That too is funny, you obsidian pot you. Personally I think I have been rather direct the whole time. Then again, thats just my opinion.

And I didn't call you petty, I called you hypocritical - i.e. your motivation is exactly the same as mine even though you attempt to chastise me for it (with your over-inflated opinion of your wit I might add).

And it seems I hit a nerve with the posting frequency thing? Sorry man, it's just something that seemed fairly obvious. And as for the punishment and who is to blame this has been covered repeatedly - go read.

I suppose I would be wasting my time asking you if you have ever used your phone whilst driving? I imagine you will be one of those who never ever done this and had a hands free kit from day 1......
 
No man, it doesn't work like that. If she was going to get into trouble it would have happened already. She cant get additional charges brought against her just because people are posting about it or get to see it now....

She may have received a slap on the wrist (or it might even have been treated as a big joke at her work), but let's say this thread does become the number one "motorite" search result (me saying "motorite" so much isn't helping either :p) and that ends up with top management feeling uneasy. Her next mistake at work may be her last.

Just one scenario in which increasing this thread's ranking won't help.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X