The Anni Dewani Murder Case

In a perfect world maybe. In the real world fingerprints found at crime scenes are usually not perfect, often distorted or incomplete. How often do they go to the trouble of making sure every point on the print matches their suspect. What's the false positive rate if we match 7 points? How is that affected by distortions and missing portions of the print? How much better is it if we go to 8 points?

I meant that one's fingerprints per se is your 'business card'.

I was not referring to actual prints on a scene; merely the fact that a human being can be distinguished via her fingerprints.

The source also said Shrien Dewani left the country at 21:00 on Tuesday.

He added that there are some questions surrounding Shrien which are puzzling the police. “There was not a single scratch or scrape on his body.”

The source will obviously not be named, presumably someone in the SAPS.

Being shoved through the back window of a car, one would assume some marks / scratches / superficial wounds.
 
From Die Burger "The man from Khayelitsha, presumably the driver of the car, will appear in the Wynberg Magistrate’s Court on Thursday on charges of hijacking and murder."

If the arrested man is in fact the driver of the vehicle, then sadly, the husband (Shrien Dewani) is implicated in the murder of his wife.

God has nothing to do with it, but this country's past as well as the ANC have everything to do with it. Educate yourself on ANC policies.
I predicted you would jump on the reference to God, lol.
Stop moving around the deck chairs on the Titanic.
I have not moved. First you stated that what I wrote made "no sense". Later you stated "I understand what you attempted to write..." I cannot help you with your assumptions unless you make them explicit.
 
If the arrested man is in fact the driver of the vehicle, then sadly, the husband (Shrien Dewani) is implicated in the murder of his wife.

I don't see that. Please explain without making wild assumptions.

Edit : Correct to "without"
 
Last edited:
Ok, townships are dodgy but seriously, we've driven into parts of khayelitsha at night to drop friends off and have left fine. Either we've gotten lucky coz we're dropping a friend off, or being brown skinned and looking like we might be packing has worked in our favour.

It was either a terrible case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or there is something else going on behind the scenes.
 
Ok, townships are dodgy but seriously, we've driven into parts of khayelitsha at night to drop friends off and have left fine. Either we've gotten lucky coz we're dropping a friend off, or being brown skinned and looking like we might be packing has worked in our favour.

It was either a terrible case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or there is something else going on behind the scenes.

thanks for narrowing down the options like that.
 
I don't see that. Please explain with making wild assumptions.

I agree with you on this. It does not nexessarily implicate the husband.

Furthermore, if the SAPS had not eliminated him as a suspect, I doubt they would have allowed him to leave the country, as he has already done 2 days ago.
 
WE

You guys are hilarious. Watching a few episodes of CSI and now we are all detectives :)

I am glad that you include the Royal *WE* :D

I get it now // Blu -- no more ie YOU were once a cop .....

How is that for a deduction ;):D

Serious

We have a brain
We have intelligence
We can read
We are not corruptable
We can learn

We are detectives -- and a sight better than the pseudo illiterates
 
I agree with you on this. It does not nexessarily implicate the husband.

Furthermore, if the SAPS had not eliminated him as a suspect, I doubt they would have allowed him to leave the country, as he has already done 2 days ago.

ur faith in SAPS may be misplaced
 
I am glad that you include the Royal *WE* :D

I get it now // Blu -- no more ie YOU were once a cop .....

How is that for a deduction ;):D

Serious

We have a brain
We have intelligence
We can read
We are not corruptable
We can learn

We are detectives -- and a sight better than the pseudo illiterates

It takes more than that to be a good detective and our problem is that we do not have all the info they have at their disposal :(

ur faith in SAPS may be misplaced

I am not saying they are correct; just saying that if they indeed had something definitive om him, they would have kept him here.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X