The Anni Dewani Murder Case

Nobody argues that, but what you fail to see is how easy it was to hire a contract killer in SA which is not good for our reputation.

Agreed. (What is left of our) reputation gets damaged by this.

On the other hand, our reputation abroad only counts for one thing. The majority of locals need crimes against locals to receive the kind of priority and fast-tracking that this crime did.
 
British businessman Shrien Dewani is reportedly desperate to clear his name following allegations that he masterminded his wife’s murder.

The 28-year-old woman was shot dead in November in Gugulethu. The incident was reportedly staged to resemble a hijacking.

Dewani is appearing in a UK court on Wednesday afternoon. He is entitled to challenge his extradition, but his publicist Max Clifford will not say if he intends doing so.

“He will make it clear that he will do whatever he can to help truth and justice come out,” Clifford said.

The police’s Sally de Beer reported the extradition process is underway.

“The normal process in extradition is the police, the investigating officer working together with the prosecutor through the National Prosecuting Authority application to the department of justice,” she explained.

It is not an easy procedure. South African police have to draw up a warrant and send it to the Justice Ministry. The document is then forwarded to international relations and British authorities
.


http://www.ewn.co.za/articleprog.aspx?id=54616
 
hmmm, who thinks he will get away with it
I do. I mean he's hired Max Clifford...to spin & a high powered lawyer here to 'defend' him in his absence. Maybe he should trade up on the divorce lawyer for Zuma's team.
 
i told you from the beginning the husband had everything to do with the murder. did he honestly think the other guy would take the rap and serve 18 years on his behalf? i think not. this was a planned murder all along. everything pointed to it. his story was weak from the beginning. sorry off to jail for you no "get out of jail free card" for you buddy.
 
Just heard on EWN news on Cape Talk that he will be contesting the extradition proceedings against him.
 
Dewani to ‘fight extradition to CT’


Shrien Dewani, who is accused of conspiring to murder his wife Anni, has been granted bail of around R2.75 million in the Westminster Magistrates Court.

Dewani was arrested on Tuesday night after handing himself over to police in Bristol.

The couple were on honeymoon in the Western Cape when Anni was shot and killed in what prosecutors are saying is a hit that was meant to look like a hijacking. The incident happened in Gugulethu and the woman was found in Khayelitsha last month.

On Tuesday, Zola Tongo, the man who drove the Dewanis from the Cape Winelands to Gugulethu, pleaded guilty to being involved in Anni’s murder. As part of his plea agreement he claimed Shrien approached him to have his wife killed.

The British businessman told the court he would not consent to being extradited to South Africa.

Some of Anni’s relatives who were in the Westminster court said all they wanted was justice.

Shrien Dewani has surrendered his passport and will stay at home in Bristol.

Meanwhile, one of Anni Dewani’s distant relatives on Wednesday said she believes the widower is genuinely devastated by his wife’s death.

Anni’s relative Bharti Kotecha said, “I could not believe it, I do not think any husband can kill her within few days, I do not see any point. He was crying anyway, when we went for the thanks giving. He had to say something about his wife and he could not speak."

Shrien Dewani’s family has released a press statement describing his frame of mind.

They described the allegations as "ludicrous" and "hurtful" to a man who is grieving the loss of his wife.
 
Shrien Dewani to remain in custody

British businessman Shrien Dewani, who was implicated in his wife Anni's murder, was to remain in custody after an appeal was lodged against the granting of £250 000 bail, Sky News reported.

The appeal would have to be heard in the London High Court within 48 hours.

Sky news reported earlier that Dewani was granted £250 000 bail and that he would fight being extradited to South Africa.
 
Two things ( not really related to each other at all, but worth mentioning !) -

1. The fact that he cried, really is not proof that he is not involved in her death.

Many people truly loved the person they killed, but had some other, greater motive to get rid of them. He may be genuinely sad.

Another explanation is that he cried because he is in shock. When you hire a contract killer, it is 'cleaner and easier' because you are not directly involved in the murder. However when the extent of what you have done (and the fact that you were found out) hits you, it can cause quite an emotional upheaval.

2. InTongo's plea bargain document, the allegation is made by him that Dewani asked him to take him to a place where he could exchange dollars (or pounds - cannot remember) for Rands without having to show his passport - clever: did not want to leave traces.

Tongo obliged and took Dewani to a place where the deal was struck.

If the people who exhanged the money for him could testify, it would also be extremely beneficial to the case. Not sure if they would though, because by doing so they would incriminate themselves.
 
It could be that Shrien is devastated at the fact he will be caught at some stage (if he did do it) rather than being devastated at the murder of his wife

edit: yeah I agree with you Blu
 
Last edited:
Ben Watson, Lawyer for the South African government also said Dewani withdrew around £1,000 in cash in the days before his wife Anni’s murder, including £800 on the eve of the shooting. Still circumstantial evidence at this stage.

Court heard there were four crucial areas of suspicion specified by SA police.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Dewani-accused-ordering-hit-Anni-Dewani.html

I hope this is not the crux of their argument!

Withdrawing money does not prove anything. Hw was a tourist, he stayed in a 5 star hotel, so the cost would be fairly high. Some people prefer to work with cash rather than credit cards.
 
Shrien Dewani stays behind bars as SA appeals bail

Johannesburg - The British newly-wed accused of paying to have his bride killed on their honeymoon will be held in jail after an appeal was lodged against the granting of £250 000 bail, the United Kingdom Press Association reported on Wednesday.

Shrien Dewani, who was arrested on Tuesday on a South African extradition warrant, was initially granted bail when he appeared at City of Westminster Magistrate's Court on Wednesday.

But the South African authorities lodged an immediate appeal, which means the businessman from Bristol will be held in custody pending a High Court hearing.

Dewani, whose wife was shot dead last month when they visited Gugulethu, was arrested on Tuesday on suspicion of conspiring to murder her.

He appeared in the dock of the packed court room wearing a maroon hooded sweater. He spoke only to confirm his name, age and date of birth.

The 30-year-old businessman was fingered by taxi driver Zola Tongo in terms of a plea agreement. He was sentenced to 18 years' imprisonment for kidnapping, murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances and obstructing the administration of justice.

Ben Watson, representing South African authorities, opposed bail and told District Judge Howard Riddle that he may appeal after Dewani's bail was initially granted.

Strict bail conditions
The court was told that he had until 17:50 to lodge the appropriate documents and if he did so, Dewani would be held in custody.

One member of Dewani's legal team, Julian Knowles, said he would then appear at the High Court for a further hearing.

That would probably not be until Thursday at the earliest.

Riddle said Dewani could be released on bail subject to a string of strict conditions, including a £250 000 surety and that he wore an electronic tag.

He was also ordered to surrender his passport, live at the family home in Bristol and observe a curfew.

He must also report at his local police station every evening and not apply for any international travel documents.

Riddle said there was a "stark" difference between the competing prosecution and defence version of events.

He said: "Either Mr Dewani over a period of time plotted the murder of his wife or he is one of the tragic victims of these circumstances."

Accused by robbers

The judge said the "succinct and strong" points made by Montgomery highlighted how Dewani could be acquitted at trial in South Africa.

He added that Dewani has the "strongest possible" community ties and his father and brother had offered sureties on his behalf.

Clare Montgomery QC, representing Dewani, said her client was accused by a group of self-confessed robbers and murderers desperate to escape a life sentence.

She branded the case against him as "flimsy" and suggested it was cooked up to defend the reputation of South Africa as a tourist destination.

Montgomery said the murder would "seriously damage the reputation of South Africa if it were merely the work of a local gang" and a story was put together to "put blame on someone else".

She said: "It is clear that what has happened has been devastating, a nightmare for him to lose his wife and now to be subject of these allegations.

"But he is personally willing to deal with these allegations and in my submission he is reasonably confident they come from men with nothing to lose and everything to gain."

Could not have arranged it

Montgomery said there was no evidence her client had travelled to South Africa before so he could not have arranged another deadly hijacking.

She added that financial records showed he only had enough money to pay the gang the money they wanted if he spent nothing at all during three days on a luxury honeymoon.

Members of both Dewani and his late wife's family were in court for the hearing.

Speaking outside court on Wednesday, members of Anni's family said they wanted "justice for Anni".

The relatives, including female women cousins, appeared shaken after hearing details of the case.

Asked if Dewani should return to South Africa, one man said: "I would say he needs to go. That is all I would say."

Another family member added as they pushed through a scrum of media, "Nothing will bring our daughter back."

- SAPA

This in late last night:
Considering that murder was his intention, maybe he brought just enough money to serve this end. This and the fact that he left shortly after it was done.


Maybe he never intended to have a honeymoon in the first place, considering that he arranged the hit on the first day that they arrived in Cape Town; according to news sources, they had already spent a week or so on safari - farce of a honeymoon over then.

PS: As I'm typing this, I'm hearing on the radio that he might be released if he complies with the strict bail conditions.
 
Last edited:
I hope this is not the crux of their argument!

Withdrawing money does not prove anything. Hw was a tourist, he stayed in a 5 star hotel, so the cost would be fairly high. Some people prefer to work with cash rather than credit cards.

I don't think that the crux is that he drew money; SAPS is going to be more interested in what he did with that money - please give them credit where it's due since they did a splendid job so far.
 
Without an established motive one would find it more difficult to prove a case based on circumstantial evidence alone, therefore the question still remains WHY DID HE DO IT..for me, that is the most intriguing part of this saga.....I guess the police are tight-lipped on this issue. There are reports from UK tabloids that the SAPS are in possession of CCTV footage indicating that he met with the taxi driver at the hotel...
 
Without an established motive one would find it more difficult to prove a case based on circumstantial evidence alone, therefore the question still remains WHY DID HE DO IT..for me, that is the most intriguing part of this saga.....I guess the police are tight-lipped on this issue. There are reports from UK tabloids that the SAPS are in possession of CCTV footage indicating that he met with the taxi driver at the hotel...
Someone confessed and implicated him. All the police have to do is present corroborating communication & contact between the two. No one will care what his motive may be if it can be proven he murdered. Maybe he's just a murderous megalomaniac... there's a story he may have arranged a similar murder in the past.

Ben Watson, for the South African government, claimed Tongo also believed Dewani had arranged another murder in the country, in similar circumstances, before.

The court heard the spotlight of suspicion turned on Dewani when police questioned why he did not use an airport-to-hotel shuttle service. Investigators also thought it strange that Tongo had taken the couple to Gugulethu, a dangerous area, to view a restaurant that closed at 9pm. They were suspicious too of the fact that neither Dewani nor the taxi driver had been injured, having been robbed and forced out of the vehicle.

http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article806373.ece/Dewani-fights-to-stay-free---and-fails
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X