JerryMungo
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 37,650
- Reaction score
- 6,345
No, just overvalued. A lot of it is trash.
Agree. Definitely a lot of players who shouldn't be there. Some of the value is hype indeed.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
No, just overvalued. A lot of it is trash.
No, just overvalued. A lot of it is trash.
All crappy coins aside, referring now to the real deal.
Specifically the idea behind this, Bitcoin will be replaced and its replacement will be replaced, but the idea behind cryptocurrencies do you think that is a fad?
A LOT of them are trash indeed. I invested R10k into a s£€ty coin named DMB. It's now worth R400, lol. I'm glad I went through that.No, just overvalued. A lot of it is trash.
A LOT of them are trash indeed. I invested R10k into a s£€ty coin named DMB. It's now worth R400, lol. I'm glad I went through that.
I hope you're not one of those people who wait for the green light from Warren Buffet or Business Day newspaper before you partake in cryptocurrenies.
Lol! You're mistaking me for someone else, I never invested in any of the coins you listed.How'd your Coinye investment go? Dogecoin? ****coin? T1tcoin? etc. etc.
IMO what the system lacks right now is a human friendly interface for transfer. I mean, I get that the address has to be unique and all, but a shorter address coupled with a second or maybe third vector, such as the recipient's email address and their own unique code for the address would be more helpful. It's the difference between being able to dictate someone's physical address and postal code vs their GPS co-ordinates over the phone... I know which is likely to be more accurate.
Not only does it have to be unique, but it has to fulfill certain requirements. When creating a bitcoin address, a 256bit random number is generated. This becomes your private key. This is then applied to the RSA algorithm which generates your public key. Your public key is then hashed twice, a (zero value) byte is added and then it is hashed again. The 1st 32 bits of this last hash is added as a checksum, and the whole string is converted to base58.How'd your Coinye investment go? Dogecoin? ****coin? T1tcoin? etc. etc.
IMO what the system lacks right now is a human friendly interface for transfer. I mean, I get that the address has to be unique and all, but a shorter address coupled with a second or maybe third vector, such as the recipient's email address and their own unique code for the address would be more helpful. It's the difference between being able to dictate someone's physical address and postal code vs their GPS co-ordinates over the phone... I know which is likely to be more accurate.
Until that is resolved, the system will remain a geek / millennial and later friendly offering.
Lol! You're mistaking me for someone else, I never invested in any of the coins you listed.
Common sense needs to be applied.Sure, just pointing out what's already been said. Lots of fly-by-nights and get rich quick attempts. It stands to reason given the movement in the markets.
Not only does it have to be unique, but it has to fulfill certain requirements. When creating a bitcoin address, a 256bit random number is generated. This becomes your private key. This is then applied to the RSA algorithm which generates your public key. Your public key is then hashed twice, a (zero value) byte is added and then it is hashed again. The 1st 32 bits of this last hash is added as a checksum, and the whole string is converted to base58.
You sign a transaction with your private key, and provide your public key. The miner which verifies the transaction can also verify that the public key is linked to your bitcoin address.
TL;DR: It is not possible to choose a bitcoin address - you can only choose a private key, and from that your public key and bitcoin address is derived.
Your common sense is not my common sense. No offense, just saying it's not always as common as we assume.Common sense needs to be applied.
All crappy coins aside, referring now to the real deal.
Specifically the idea behind this, Bitcoin will be replaced and its replacement will be replaced, but the idea behind cryptocurrencies do you think that is a fad?
It seems blockchain tech is here to stay though there is a lot of thrashing around trying to find uses for it.
As to cryptocurrencies, if bitcoin was like $100 I'd buy some, but that ship has sailed, so I'll pass.
...I said something similar in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013... etc.
No way I'm buying into it at this price. Good luck to you lot.
Buying BTC is not the only opportunity out there.
I'm not into gambling.
Do you invest at all? Scrap that question. We all gamble, we just either convince ourselves nothing will ever go wrong or we come to terms with the reality that it can. Some of us spend more time investigating the risks and some of us have more means to support risk taking... you also get those who don't count the cost and do things blindly... but we all gamble.
I'm a serial entrepreneur (started five companies in 27 years) so I know all about gambling. But it's a type of gambling I'm comfortable with. Crypto currencies at the current prices, no way.