They...literally...did...agree...though?
There was even a vote to join...
No. The union was agreed by the lords and landowners. It was so unpopular that there were several days of riots at the time.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
They...literally...did...agree...though?
There was even a vote to join...
We're going in a retarded circle now.
LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU LEAVE @Spizz
Picture of me waiting:
View attachment 1065405
As I said, I’m not so much in favour of it as you think I am. But anyone who tells me that I cannot decide on the destiny of my own country can fsck right off.
I'm still waiting to be proven wrong, big boy.You must be really really tired after that marathon session of columbidae chess, I’d have given up ages ago.
And I'm waiting for when, as you say, Scotland can do whatever the fek it wants.As I said, I’m not so much in favour of it as you think I am. But anyone who tells me that I cannot decide on the destiny of my own country can fsck right off.
I'm still waiting to be proven wrong, big boy.
So far it's been a bunch of bullshet feels from people who pretend to know something about nothing.
You may besorry guv, no comprehendo pidgin…
You may beretardedimpaired then as it was perfectly good English with a dash of memes.
Are you a Scot too?
Thought so. Not a single scrap showing I'm wrong.I’m not in the pigeon chess league this season, sorry.
Nope.
Thought so. Not a single scrap showing I'm wrong.
You already conceded that Scotland is a country. I’ve already agreed that current legislation means Scotland can’t just walk away. What else is it you are harping on about?
Pleased to see that asylum is finally being blocked for people who have travelled through safe countries.
Ministers have quietly changed immigration rules to prevent people fleeing war or persecution from claiming asylum in the UK if they have passed through a “safe” third country, prompting accusations of a breach of international law.
From 1 January, claims of asylum from a person who has travelled through or has a connection to a safe third country, including people coming from EU member states, will be treated as inadmissible.
Nice move from Priti Patel. I think she admitted somewhere that her parents might not have been allowed under current immigration rules.Finally? It was announced last year.
![]()
UK to deny asylum to refugees passing through 'safe' third country
Immigration rule will also prevent migrants from making a claim in UK territorial waterswww.theguardian.com
Nice move from Priti Patel.
There hasn't been any traction at all though.Finally? It was announced last year.
![]()
UK to deny asylum to refugees passing through 'safe' third country
Immigration rule will also prevent migrants from making a claim in UK territorial waterswww.theguardian.com
BoJo government motto is 'Can I be stupider than a x-grader' so that is not a problem.Possibly, but it might also make the UK look stupid if it’s judged to be illegal under international law (which a few commentators feel it is) or requiring an agreement with the prior safe countries to accept returns (post Brexit will France be all that amenable to the idea?).
Could argue that as the UK no longer has access to EU funding to process asylum seekers (including housing them, etc, until decision are made) as part of the Dublin Regulation, it may even be easier to send them back to where they came from (the EU). Also, I imagine our mandatory quota for the number of refugees we HAVE to take in every year falls away as we're no longer a member state?Possibly, but it might also make the UK look stupid if it’s judged to be illegal under international law (which a few commentators feel it is) or requiring an agreement with the prior safe countries to accept returns (post Brexit will France be all that amenable to the idea?).
our mandatory quota for the number of refugees we HAVE to take in every year falls away as we're no longer a member state?