The Gauteng E-tolling Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Heard an interesting call on 702 today.

Guy said he asked to pay (in cash), but they said he has to register to pay. Now the law doesn't state registration is mandatory, even if having to pay to use the roads is. So how can they 'force' you to register, in order to pay (which is a legal requirement), when having to register is not?

catch 101, it's all a scam to get you to sign agreement.
 
Heard an interesting call on 702 today.

Guy said he asked to pay (in cash), but they said he has to register to pay. Now the law doesn't state registration is mandatory, even if having to pay to use the roads is. So how can they 'force' you to register, in order to pay (which is a legal requirement), when having to register is not?

Then refuse to pay and write everything that happened down and have it affidavited. Wait for your day in court and hand your affidavit to the magistrate.
 
http://www.iol.co.za/motoring/industry-news/minister-makes-e-toll-concessions-1.1720288#.U8YjpvmSx8E

Cape Town - Transport Minister Dipuo Peters on Tuesday announced a “reprieve” for the users of Gauteng's toll roads.

Opening debate in Parliament on her department's budget, she told MPs this was being done “to make it easier for people to comply” with e-tolls.

The concessions included a “further extension of the payment period to avoid the VPC process that would negatively affect vehicle owners”.

Peters said users would “have an extended payment period of 51 days, from the day they pass through the gantry, as opposed to the current seven days”.

They would also receive the time-of-day discount.

“A non-registered user will receive 60 percent off the alternative tariff if they pay within 51 days.”

For registered users, the following “reprieves” would be introduced:

- a 48 percent e-tag-holder discount,

- time-of-day discounts,

- frequent-user discounts and

- a “R450 calendar-month cap for class A2/light vehicles”.


Peters said, to applause from ruling party benches, that she trusted the concessions “will go some way towards lessening the financial burden on the part of users”.

She also told the House that the user-pay principle remained a policy of government.

“We urge the users of the tolled Gauteng road network to continue contributing towards the building of a better South Africa, to move our country forward."

She urged those who were not registered for e-tolls to do so, including MPs.

“It is our responsibility, as a collective of lawmakers, to make sure that we encourage South Africans to be responsible for that which they would want to have.”

Speaking later in the debate, DA MP Manny de Freitas told Peters the public had unanimously rejected e-tolls.

“This issue has been handled poorly from the very beginning,” he said.

Labelling the review announced last week by Gauteng premier David Makhura as “nothing more than a public relations stunt”, he called on the minister to appoint a parliamentary committee to review e-tolling.

He also challenged her to tell the House “if Sanral still intends to pursue the prosecution and criminalisation of some one million people who have not paid their e-toll bills”.

Earlier on Tuesday, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said prosecutors had been appointed to work with the South African National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) to deal with non-payment of e-toll tariffs.

“We have assigned two prosecutors to work with Sanral with the view to establish whether the activities by some motorists constitute an offence in terms of the Sanral Act,” NPA spokesperson Nathi Mncube said.

“Section 27(5)(a) makes it an offence to refuse or fail to pay the amount of toll that is due and is punishable on conviction with imprisonment or a fine.”

The e-toll system was implemented across Gauteng on December 3, following several court challenges and widespread public opposition.

Many motorists have refused to get an e-tag or pay their e-tolls.

Last week, Makhura announced a panel of 15 people appointed to assess the socio-economic impact of e-tolls in the province.

The panel, which will meet for the first time on Thursday, will assess the effect of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project on the economy and on Gauteng residents.

It would invite proposals and submissions from residents on proposed solutions. The panel would submit its findings and recommendations to the provincial government.

Sapa

Still worse than fuel levy so simply not good enough.

Aren't all of those registered users reprieves already active? It's like they don't even know the system themselves.
 
If user-pay is the policy of government, where do I get my tax rebate on the lack of public school/public hospital usage in my life?
 
If user-pay is the policy of government, where do I get my tax rebate on the lack of public school/public hospital usage in my life?

Don't forget the private security force I have to hire because the Police is inept and corrupt.
 
Heard an interesting call on 702 today.

Guy said he asked to pay (in cash), but they said he has to register to pay. Now the law doesn't state registration is mandatory, even if having to pay to use the roads is. So how can they 'force' you to register, in order to pay (which is a legal requirement), when having to register is not?

Sounds like BS.

I know someone who pays cash, they have never been asked to register.

They just give the registration number and pay.
 
Personally I have stayed off the e-toll roads, except for the portions that do not have gantries, but it is starting to be a pain to drive back from the airport through Edenvale, and to drive to Pretoria on the Old Johannesburg Road.

Going to Durban is also a pain, have to go past Carnival City and join the N3 at Heidelberg.
 
E-TOLL PANEL HOLDS FIRST MEETING

The panel that will examine the effect e-tolling has had in Gauteng will meet for the first time on Thursday, the provincial government said.

Premier David Makhura announced the names of 10 of the 15 members of the panel last Thursday.

"If we were not serious we wouldn't announce that this matter required our attention... We wouldn't come this far," Makhura said at the time.

"When we meet with the panel... we will discuss that it is a matter of public interest."

The meeting will start with a photo opportunity for the media and the panel will then get down to the business of discussing the controversial system which started operating across Gauteng on December 3, following several court challenges and widespread public opposition.

The panel members are: chairman Muxe Nkondo, Patricia Hanekom, John Ngcebetsha, Vuyo Mahlathi, Luci Abrahams, Fiona Tregenna, Anna Mokgokong, John Sampson, Lauretta Teffo, and Chris Malikane.

Five more members were expected to be announced later, Makhura said.

The panel was tasked with inviting proposals and submissions from Gauteng residents on proposed solutions to e-tolling. It would submit its finding and recommendations to the provincial government.

"The panel is expected to present monthly reports, and final report and recommendations to the Gauteng provincial government by 30 November 2014."

On Tuesday Transport Minister Dipuo Peters announced a "reprieve" for the users of Gauteng's toll roads.

She said users would "have an extended payment period of 51 days, from the day they pass through the gantry, as opposed to the [current] seven days".

They would also receive the time-of-day discount.

On September 25, President Jacob Zuma signed into law the Transport Laws and Related Matters Amendment Bill, giving the go-ahead for e-tolling in Gauteng.


Source : Sapa /aa/jje
Date : 17 Jul 2014 07:59
 
Totally pointless. The fuel levy goes into the general fiscus.

fully agree - silly new fashion, like spam, to have these stupid petitions that nobody in power even glances at
 
SANRAL TO COMPLY WITH PETERS' CALL

The SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) will heed Transport Minister Dipuo Peters' call for the prosecution of non-paying e-toll users to be halted for now.

Sanral spokesman Vusi Mona said on Monday that the company acted according to its shareholder's directive.

"The minister represents the shareholder -- the government. Therefore, the agency acts in line with what the minister has said in this regard."

On Friday, Peters' spokesman Tiyani Rikhotso said she had spoken with Sanral about the holding back of the prosecution processes.

"She believes there are still a number of outstanding issues that need to be resolved, particularly those that affect the users of the roads, including inaccurate billing."

Rikhotso said the department believed the issues needed to be looked at correctly, so people were not punished, and ensure the country had the infrastructure to grow the economy.

On Tuesday, the National Prosecuting Authority said it had appointed two prosecutors to work with Sanral to deal with non-payment of e-tolls.

"We have assigned two prosecutors to work with Sanral with the view to establish whether the activities by some motorists constitute an offence in terms of the Sanral Act," NPA spokesman Nathi Mncube said at the time.

"Section 27(5)(a) makes it an offence to refuse or fail to pay the amount of toll that is due and is punishable on conviction with imprisonment or a fine."

Rikhotso said it was important to have as many people complying with the system as possible.

"We need to have every one on board and ensure we do not rush into a situation where we seek to wield the stick, while there are still a number of things we believe we can do to make the situation better and ensure more people comply."

He said the department's aim was to lessen the burden on the consumer.

On Tuesday, Peters announced a "reprieve" for the users of Gauteng's e-tolled roads.

Opening debate in Parliament on her department's budget, she told MPs this was being done "to make it easier for people to comply" with e-tolls.

Peters said users would have 51 days from the day they passed through the gantry, as opposed to the current seven days, to pay their bills. They would also get a time-of-day discount.


Source : Sapa /mr/ks
Date : 21 Jul 2014 19:40
 
"We need to have every one on board and ensure we do not rush into a situation where we seek to wield the stick, while there are still a number of things we believe we can do to make the situation better and ensure more people comply."

Easy, scrap e-tolls, revise the fuel levy and you have 100% compliance overnight...
 
Easy, scrap e-tolls, revise the fuel levy and you have 100% compliance overnight...

Indeed, then scrap the gantries and prosecute everyone who rushed this failed project through and who gained financially when they would not have gained had they chosen the fuel levy from the start.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X