The Islamic State Thread

Iraqi Kurdistan Set To Become An Independent World Oil Power

Iraqi Kurdistan is on its way to become totally independent from Iraq. The Iraqi army will never be able to regain Kirkuk now.
ISIL is a flash in the pan - the most unlikely coalition in the world will completely obliterate them.
This is the biggest thing that will happen from this. It will be interesting what effect this will have on that region, especially for the Kurd regions in Turkish, Syrian and Iranian territory.

Flash in the pan?

http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthr...ar-weapons?p=12879033&viewfull=1#post12879033
 
[video=youtube;RojiK_l45hY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RojiK_l45hY[/video]
 
Yip, a product of necessity. They've been on the receiving end of oppression and genocides everywhere in the ME. The Peshmerga are pretty badass.

Yeah, I've seen articles claiming that they are the Gurkhas of the Middle East. Ferocious fighters.
 
MILITANTS ATTACK IRAQ'S MAIN OIL REFINERY: OFFICIALS

Militants attacked Iraq's main oil refinery early Wednesday as they pressed an offensive that has seen them capture swathes of territory, a manager and a refinery employee said.

Clashes erupted at around 4:00 am (0100 GMT) at the Baiji refinery in Salaheddin province, north of Baghdad, and some tanks containing refined products caught fire.

A senior manager of the state-owned North Oil Company said militants attacked parts of the refinery complex, leading to heavy clashes.

A refinery employee said there had been casualties among security force personnel and that staff had fled.

Officials told AFP on Tuesday that the refinery had been shut down and many employees evacuated, because major towns seized by the militants, including second city Mosul, were no longer being supplied with refined products.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Jun 2014 09:32
 
IRAN WILL DO EVERYTHING TO PROTECT IRAQ SHRINES: PRESIDENT

President Hassan Rouhani said Wednesday that Iran would do whatever it takes to protect revered Shiite Muslim holy sites in Iraq against Sunni militants fighting the Baghdad government.

"Dear Karbala, Dear Najaf, Dear Kadhimiyah and Dear Samarra, we warn the great powers and their lackeys and the terrorists, the great Iranian people will do everything to protect them," he said, naming the sites of the shrines in an emotive speech in Khoram-abad, near the Iraq border.

Rouhani on Saturday pledged to help the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government if it asked for assistance, though at that time no such request had been forthcoming.

In his speech on Tuesday, Rouhani mentioned petitions signed by Iranians who said they were willing to fight in Iraq "to destroy the terrorists and protect the holy sites", which are visited by hundreds of thousands of Iranian pilgrims annually.

"Thank God there are enough volunteers Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds in Iraq to fight the terrorists," he added.

The Iranian pledges follow a call by top Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani for Iraqis to volunteer to resist the onslaught spearheaded by the jihadist Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), who hold the major cities of Mosul and Tikrit and are fighting north of the capital.

Iran is 90 percent Shiite. Maliki, a Shiite, spent years in exile in Iran when Sunni Arab dictator Saddam Hussein was in power in Baghdad.

ISIL considers Shiites to be apostates.

The major Shiite shrines in Iraq are in Najaf and Karbala, south of the capital, in the district of Kadhimiyah in Baghdad and in Samarra to the north, which the militants have made repeated, but so far unsuccessful, efforts to enter.

At least 5,000 Iranians have pledged online to defend Iraq's Shiite shrines against the Sunni extremists, a conservative news website in Iran reported on Tuesday.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Jun 2014 10:08
 
SAUDI WARNS OF CIVIL WAR IN IRAQ

Saudi Arabia warned Wednesday of the risks of civil war in Iraq with unpredictable consequences for the region, after Sunni militants seized large areas from Shiite-led government forces.

The unrest in Iraq "carries warning signs of a civil war with unpredictable consequences for the region," Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said at the opening of an Islamic bloc meeting in the Red Sea city of Jeddah.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Jun 2014 10:32
 
SAUDI WARNS OF CIVIL WAR IN IRAQ

Saudi Arabia warned Wednesday of the risks of civil war in Iraq with unpredictable consequences for the region, after Sunni militants seized large areas from Shiite-led government forces.

The unrest in Iraq "carries warning signs of a civil war with unpredictable consequences for the region," Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said at the opening of an Islamic bloc meeting in the Red Sea city of Jeddah.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Jun 2014 10:32

There has been a civil war in Iraq since after the conventional war with Saddam Hussein ended.
 
SAUDI WARNS OF CIVIL WAR IN IRAQ

Saudi Arabia warned Wednesday of the risks of civil war in Iraq with unpredictable consequences for the region, after Sunni militants seized large areas from Shiite-led government forces.

The unrest in Iraq "carries warning signs of a civil war with unpredictable consequences for the region," Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said at the opening of an Islamic bloc meeting in the Red Sea city of Jeddah.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 18 Jun 2014 10:32

They are also being accused of helping and funding ISIS, which wouldnt be surprising if true.

The Iraq government have launched a stinging attack on neighbours Saudi Arabia, accusing the oil-rich theocracy of providing moral and financial support for ISIS militants holding several key cities and advancing on Baghdad.
................
Iraq's mainly Shia-led government suspects Saudi's Sunni rulers of involvement in ISIS operations. In a statement Iraq's leaders said: "We hold them responsible for supporting these groups financially and morally, and for the outcome of that - which includes crimes that may qualify as genocide: the spilling of Iraqi blood, the destruction of Iraqi state institutions and historic and religious sites." Riyadh has denied the accusations.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-attacks-iraq-accuses-saudi-arabia-supporting-genocide-1453101

Iraq's Shia leaders have accused Saudi Arabia of promoting "genocide" by backing Sunni militants, as Baghdad battles insurgents who have seized swathes of territory.
http://news.sky.com/story/1283751/iraq-accuses-saudi-arabia-of-promoting-genocide
 
INDIA SAYS 40 CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ABDUCTED IN IRAQ

Forty Indian construction workers have been abducted in violence-hit northern Iraq, the Indian foreign ministry confirmed Wednesday.

"Forty Indian workers of the Tariq Nur Al Huda company in Mosul have been kidnapped," foreign ministry spokesman Syed Akbaruddin told reporters in New Delhi.


Source : Sapa-AFP /kd
Date : 18 Jun 2014 13:04
 
20 KILLED AS MILITANTS SEIZE VILLAGES IN NORTH IRAQ: OFFICIAL

Militants seized three villages in northern Iraq on Wednesday during clashes with security forces and residents that left 20 civilians dead, a local official said.

The official, Shallal Abdul Baban, named the villages as Albu Hassan, Birwajli and Bastamli, in Salaheddin province.


Source : Sapa-AFP /kd
Date : 18 Jun 2014 13:36
 
IRAQ FORCES SUFFERED 'SETBACK' BUT NOT DEFEAT: PM

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki vowed on Wednesday to "face terrorism" while insisting Iraqi security forces that wilted under a major militant offensive had suffered a "setback" but not a defeat.

"We will face terrorism and bring down the conspiracy," the premier vowed in televised remarks in which he also said that "not every setback is a defeat," in reference to the performance of Iraqi forces.


Source : Sapa-AFP /kd
Date : 18 Jun 2014 13:32
 
MILITANTS IN IRAQ, SYRIA 'PLAN TO ATTACK BRITAIN': PM

Prime Minister David Cameron warned Wednesday that militants making advances in Iraq and fighting in Syria were also planning to attack Britain.

"I'd disagree with those people who think this is nothing to do with us and if they want to have some sort of extreme Islamist regime in the middle of Iraq that won't affect us -- it will," Cameron told the House of Commons.

"The people in that regime, as well as trying to take territory, are also planning to attack us here at home in the United Kingdom."

He was speaking before chairing a meeting of the government's National Security Council (NSC) on the militant offensive in Iraq, which is being spearheaded by jihadists from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

At a news conference on Tuesday following talks with Chinese premier Li Keqiang, Cameron said that ISIL in Syria and now Iraq "is the most serious threat to Britain's security that there is today".

The main concern is that British citizens fighting there may return to attack their homeland, and Cameron said on Wednesday that Britain's security, intelligence, and policing resources were focused on the Middle East.

Cameron told parliament: "The estimates are now that this is a greater threat to the UK than the return of foreign jihadists or fighters from the Afghanistan or Pakistan region."

He said that "we've already stopped a number of people travelling, we've taken away passports", although he did not give any further details.

Around 400 Britons are believed to have gone to fight in the conflict in Syria over the last two years, authorities believe, and around 20 have died.

After the controversies of Britain's participation in the US-led invasions of Iraq in 2003 and Afghanistan in 2001, there is little appetite for direct British military intervention to stop the militants in Syria and Iraq.

But Cameron said: "I think it would be a mistake to believe that the only answer to these problems is the hard attack of direct intervention."

What was needed was a "long-term, hard-headed, patient and intelligent" approach, focused around ensuring that governments in the region were "fully representative" and did not allow space or support for extremists, he said.


Source : Sapa-AFP /kd
Date : 18 Jun 2014 14:56
 
MILITANTS IN IRAQ, SYRIA 'PLAN TO ATTACK BRITAIN': PM

Prime Minister David Cameron warned Wednesday that militants making advances in Iraq and fighting in Syria were also planning to attack Britain.
it's high time you slammed the doors shut & expelled the locusts eating away at, & poisoning your country.
 
Q AND A ON IRAN'S RELATIONSHIP WITH IRAQ

President Hassan Rouhani pledged Wednesday that Iran will do whatever it takes to protect Shiite shrines in Iraq from Sunni militants battling the Baghdad government.

However, he does not want to send troops and would most likely rely on volunteer militias. Iran and Iraq have close ties and are united by Shiite Islam, but their relationship is more complex.

What is the present role of Iran in Iraq?

Iran is 90 percent Shiite and around 6,000 Iranians visit each day the mausoleum of revered Shiite Imam Hussein in Karbala.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki is a Shiite who took shelter in Iran during the rule of Sunni dictator Saddam Hussein, when Iraq's Shiite majority population was oppressed.

Maliki returned to Iraq after the 2003 US-led invasion and became prime minister in 2006 and Iran helped negotiate his second term as premier in a governing coalition after a 2010 election that he had lost.

The advance of jihadists from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and allied groups through northern Iraq towards Baghdad is prompting caution about Maliki, who is seen by diplomats and analysts as having inflamed sectarian tensions by centralising power in his office and largely excluding Sunnis from the political process.

Will Iran deploy troops on Iraqi soil?

Tehran has no desire to become embroiled in a military conflict. The wounds of the 1980-1988 war with Iraq remain raw and Rouhani on Saturday said Baghdad's political leaders have the capacity to solve the problem of ISIL.

However, Qassem Suleimani, commander of the Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is said by diplomats to have been in Baghdad since last Friday, advising Maliki.

Iraqi security forces wilted under the militant offensive, with some ditching their uniforms to flee.

Iran sent military advisers to Syria in support of President Bashar al-Assad against rebels and could do the same in Iraq.

Does Iran finance Shiite militias in Iraq?

The US military in Iraq certainly thought so. American officers routinely cited Iran's financial support and supply of weapons to militias who used them to attack US troops, and accused Iran's Revolutionary Guards of training militants who kidnapped and killed American soldiers. US battlefield reports published by WikiLeaks state that the Quds Force worked with Iraqi extremists to encourage the killing of Iraqi officials.

How far is Iran willing to go to help Maliki?

Although Maliki is seen as a strongman and a survivor, his opponents accuse him of centralising power and sectarianism. The past week has also called into question his credibility as leader of the armed forces.

A Western diplomat told AFP: "Iran's support is becoming more measured. There is mistrust of official military involvement in Iraq because Iran does not want to fall into the trap of an intervention that would be perceived as a war against Sunnis. Maliki is a politician of experience, but Iran can find other acceptable candidates, such as (deputy premier) Hussein al-Shahristani and Ammar al-Hakim," who heads the Citizens bloc seen close to Iran.

Ramzy Mardini, non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council, believes there is no clear alternative, for now. "Iran can't just wave it's wand and make Maliki disappear. Maliki isn't just one man, he embodies a regime and security apparatus. Iran needs Maliki, and Maliki needs Iran."

Is US-Iranian cooperation in fighting militants led by ISIL possible?

"Yes," says Mardini. "The US and Iran share key interests with regards to the stability and unity of post-Saddam Iraq. ISIL is both a common enemy and an emerging threat." The United States and Iran also conferred on security matters relating to the Taliban in Afghanistan, following the September 11, 2011 attacks on the US.

Will the Iraq crisis have an impact on Iran's regional influence?

Iran believes its support for Assad has been vindicated both by his election victory and the "terrorist contagion" that has seen ISIL spread in Syria and Iraq.

"Iran has shown it has the ability to bolster stability in the region," says Iranian political analyst Amir Mohebian.

Despite the split over Syria, Gulf Arab states may also look to Tehran. "The Gulf states can no longer rely on the United States as they once had before to balance Iran, which creates the rationale to reposition their foreign policies from balancing to hedging," says Mardini. "Their geopolitical realities are favouring improved relations with Iran, not worse."


Source : Sapa-AFP /kd
Date : 18 Jun 2014 15:57
 

http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthr...ar-weapons?p=12879033&viewfull=1#post12879033

Iran Warns U.S. Against Intervention in Iraq
As Obama touts partnership, Iran warns of repercussions

...

Iran’s warning came less than a day after senior Obama administration officials expressed optimism about partnering with Tehran and signals that the White House may be misreading Iran’s intentions in Iraq.

The State Department in recent days has taken heat for ignoring its own warning about Iran’s efforts to destabilize Iraq. U.S. official have instead conducted a full court press to convince the nation that Iran and America have a “shared interest” in the region.

Senior Iranian military and political officials do not share this rosy view and are now issuing warnings to U.S. leaders as the violence in Iraq hits new highs.

Iranian General Hassan Firouzabadi, chief of staff of the country’s armed forces, slammed the United States and blamed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for sponsoring terrorist groups in Iraq and the region.

“By any meddling and military intervention in Iraq, the Americans are seeking to attain ungracious goals, at the top of which undermining the elections in Iraq, and the crocodile tears of the Americans should not receive any attention, as they are still the allies of the sponsors and supporters of terrorists in the region,” Firouzabadi was quoted as saying in Tehran on Tuesday by the country’s state-run press.

Clinton’s State Department, the general claimed, “created terrorist groups” and is now “displeased with the results of the recent elections in Iraq and is cancel election results.”

Iranian officials say that they can handle the Iraq terror group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) without any U.S. assistance.

“The Iraqi army and nation are mighty enough to overcome terrorists of the ISIL,” according to remarks made earlier this week by Iran’s deputy foreign minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian, who vigorously denied reports that Iranian and U.S. officials are discussing joint tactics in Iraq.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran has had no negotiations with the Americans over mutual cooperation in Iraq,” Abdollahian was quoted as saying.

Iranian nuclear negotiators in Vienna also denied that the United States and Iran discussed Iraq at any point.

“In negotiations with the Americans, merely the nuclear issue was discussed,” Seyed Abbas Araqchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister and its senior negotiator, said on Monday.

Iran’s Firouzabadi also claimed that the ISIL is an Israeli creation meant to distract the region.

“The ISIL is Israel’s cover up for distancing the revolutionary forces from Israeli borders and creating a margin of security for the Zionists, and the Zionist media have also admitted this fact,” he was quoted as saying.

The comments by top Iranian officials have drastically differed from those made by leading Obama administration figures.

...

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-warns-u-s-against-intervention-in-iraq/

The Intrigue Lying Behind Iraq's Jihadist Uprising
Tuesday, June 17, 2014 - 03:05

...

Syria and Lebanon always make for useful proxy battlegrounds, though a Sunni rebellion has little chance of actually toppling the Iranian-backed regime in Damascus, and Lebanon is too fragmented for any one regional player to claim a decisive advantage. The contest has thus shifted back to Mesopotamia, where Iran cannot afford to see its Shiite gains slip and where Saudi Arabia -- both the government and private citizens -- has maintained strong ties with many of the Sunni tribes in Anbar and Mosul provinces that have facilitated the Sunni uprising. There is no love lost between the Saudis and the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. In fact, the Saudis have branded it a terrorist organization and have even uncovered cells of the group on Saudi soil plotting against the kingdom.

But the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant is also not the only group participating in the current offensive. Former Baathist fighters from the Naqshabandiyya Way along with Jaish al-Mujahideen and Jaish Ansar al-Sunnah are also playing a substantial role in the fighting. Most of the Sunni militias and the growing number of Awakening Council (Sunni fighters recruited by the United States to battle al Qaeda in Iraq) defectors joining these militias coordinate directly with the Majlis Thuwar al Anbar (Anbar insurgents' council), which in turn coordinates with the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant on a selective basis. Saudi Arabia's acting intelligence chief, Yousef bin Ali al Idrisis, is believed to be in direct communication with the Majlis Thuwar al Anbar, affording Riyadh the opportunity to influence the shape of the battlefield -- and thereby to aggravate Iran in a highly sensitive spot.

As a bonus for Saudi Arabia, even as the Sunni uprising is largely confined to Iraq's Sunni belt and thus unlikely to seriously upset Iraq's production and exports from the Shiite south, the price of Brent crude has climbed to $113 a barrel for the first time this year. Saudi Arabia is not the only one that welcomes this bump in the price of oil; Russia is quite pleased with the outcome in Iraq as well.

Revisiting a Mysterious Meeting in Sochi

Just days before the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant-led offensive in Iraq, a quiet meeting took place at Russian President Vladimir Putin's vacation spot in Sochi on June 3. Putin invited Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal to see him and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who cut short an engagement in Moscow to get there on time. Details on the meeting are scarce. Our attempt to obtain information about the gathering from Russian and Saudi contacts resulted in scripted and strangely identical responses that claimed that Saudi Arabia and Russia were discussing a power-sharing resolution for Syria. The state-owned Saudi Press Agency then reported June 10 that Lavrov and al-Faisal had a follow-up phone conversation to discuss a Syrian settlement. Syria may well have been on the agenda, and Russia has an interest in protecting its influence in Damascus through a deal that keeps Syrian President Bashar al Assad in power, but we suspect there was more to these engagements.

Both Saudi Arabia and Russia share two key interests: undermining the U.S.-Iranian negotiating track and ensuring oil prices remain at a comfortable level, i.e., above $100 a barrel. There is little either can do to keep Iran and the United States from negotiating a settlement. In fact, the jihadist threat in Iraq creates another layer of cooperation between Iran and the United States. That said, Washington is now facing another major Middle Eastern maelstrom at the same time it has been anxiously trying to prove to itself and everyone else that the United States has bigger issues to deal with in other parts of the world, namely, in Russia's backyard. Moreover, the United States and Turkey are not of one mind on how to manage Iraq at a time when Washington needs Ankara's cooperation against Russia. If an Iraq-sized distraction buys Moscow time to manage its own periphery with limited U.S. interference, all the better for Putin. Meanwhile, if Saudi Arabia can weaken Iran and test U.S.-Iranian cooperation, it might well be worth the risk for Riyadh to try -- at least for the time being.

A Lesson from History

Whether by mere coincidence, strategic design or a blend of the two, there are as many winners as there are losers in the Iraq game. Russia knows this game well. The United States, the heir to the Sykes-Picot map, will be forced to learn it fast.

When the French and British were colluding over the post-Ottoman map in 1916, czarist Russia quietly acquiesced as Paris and London divided up the territories. Just a year later, in 1917, the Soviets threw a strategic spanner into the Western agenda by publishing the Sykes-Picot agreement, planting the seeds for Arab insurrection and thus ensuring that Europe's imperialist rule over the Middle East would be anything but easy. The U.S. administration recognizes the trap that has been laid. But more mindful of the region's history this time around, Washington will likely leave it to the regional players to absorb most of the risk.

http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/intrigue-lying-behind-iraqs-jihadist-uprising#axzz350LBBTrk
 
Russia expanding it's ability to coerce countries in ME.

May 19, 2014

Among the most recent developments is a small but significant natural gas export deal between Russia’s Gazprom and Egypt’s EGAS, under which Russia’s state-controlled gas firm will deliver seven shipments of gas to Egypt in 2015. An Egyptian press report on the deal stresses not only that EGAS obtained a “favorable rate” for the gas, but that the agreement will allow for “grace periods” to pay for it. Taking place in parallel with Gazprom’s dramatic price increases for its exports to Ukraine — and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s insistence that Kiev pay in advance — the modest sale looks overtly political. EGAS officials note that they turned to Gazprom after negotiations with an Algerian firm collapsed due to strong European Union interest in increasing imports from the country to reduce gas dependence on Russia. Egypt’s Ministry of Petroleum appears to hope that this will allow the country to import Russian gas “at a rate that is lower than market prices” beyond 2015.

A bigger deal in the future is certainly possible; Moscow has a long history of below-market energy exports to its special friends, including its former Warsaw Pact allies — now paying market rates as NATO members — and, of course, Ukraine at various times. Of course, the Soviet Union took a similar approach to arms exports, which it often provided with long-term financing. In 1987, Soviet officials rescheduled some $3 billion in Egyptian debt for former Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser’s weapons imports during the 1960s. A later arrangement in 1994 reportedly settled all outstanding Egyptian debts.

Egypt’s gas purchase comes amid warm rhetoric from top officials on both sides, including Putin’s endorsement of Abdel Fattah al-Sisi’s presidential campaign earlier this year — in a meeting in Russia during Sisi’s first foreign trip after taking power — and a pointed statement by Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabil Fahmy in Washington that Cairo will “seek to nurture and leverage” its ties to Moscow, while insisting that this would not come at America’s expense. Meanwhile, Egypt opted not to vote on a United Nations General Assembly resolution calling on all UN member states to refrain from recognizing Russia’s annexation of Crimea in an apparent effort to avoid US pressure to support the measure, which was implicitly critical of Moscow.

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/05/gazprom-russia-egypt-obama-ties-gas-export.html#

March 21, 2014

And now, Iran. The latest round of talks between Iran and the P5+1 world powers, including the United States and Russia, concluded this week. But the Russians are now hinting that they might hold the talks hostage if the United States reacts too strongly to Russia’s Ukraine policy. Listen to Sergei Ryabkov, Russia’s deputy foreign minister and delegate to the P5+1 talks with Iran:

We wouldn’t like to use these talks as an element of the game of raising the stakes, taking into account the sentiments in some European capitals, Brussels and Washington. But if they force us into that, we will take retaliatory measures here as well. The historic importance of what happened in the last weeks and days regarding the restoration of historical justice and reunification of Crimea with Russia is incomparable to what we are dealing with in the Iranian issue.

Some analysts say that Russia has its own national interest in trying to prevent Iran from getting the bomb, but the fact is that Iran is nowhere near getting a bomb. Still, the United States does need Russia to help diplomatically with Iran, and it needs both Iran and Russia vis-à-vis Syria. Among other things, Russia could easily shatter the sanctions consensus on Iran, reopening trade ties with its neighbor to the south. And, in the extreme, Russia could start delivering anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense systems to Iran, including an advanced type that would terrify Israel and perhaps lead hawkish Israelis to demand air strikes on Iran before the missiles could be put in place.

As Al Monitor reported in February, commenting on improving Russia-Iran ties:

Iranian-Russian strategic cooperation could also help Moscow maintain security in Russia’s southern regions, especially managing the growing threat from terrorism. Furthermore, Moscow and Tehran could try to align their positions on the Caspian Sea legal regime and on the utilization of its resources. It might also pave the way for the participation of Russian companies in Iranian energy, infrastructure and industrial projects, especially if Western governments drag their feet in removing sanctions against Iran.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/178955/will-iran-syria-and-egypt-take-their-cues-russia#

https://www.google.com/search?q=pipeline+wars&gws_rd=ssl
 
Last edited:
[video=youtube;tdTNm54UHkA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdTNm54UHkA[/video]
 
ABDUCTED INDIAN WORKERS IN IRAQ 'PROMISED FREEDOM'

Several families of 40 Indian construction workers abducted in strife-torn northern Iraq say they have spoken with the men, whose captors claim they will be freed unharmed, reports said Thursday.

India's foreign ministry announced on Wednesday that the 40 workers had been abducted in recent days in the Iraqi city of Mosul, which Sunni militants have overrun in a deadly ongoing insurgency.

The ministry said no demands for ransom had been made and the workers' whereabouts, along with who was responsible for the abductions, were not known.

But Charanjit Singh said his brother called him on Wednesday "for a couple of minutes" to tell him the workers were safe and that their captors had claimed they would be released if someone from the government made contact.

"He said he and his co-workers from India were all safe and not held hostage," Singh told The Hindu newspaper from his home in northern Punjab state.

"They say (the militants) will release them if someone responsible from the Indian military or government comes to collect them," Singh added.

Gurpinder Kaur said her brother told her on June 15 that the militants had promised to free the group "safely without any conditions" if New Delhi got in touch with them.

She added that the Indians were taken by the militants on June 11, according to the Indian Express newspaper.

While the families said the phone calls were cause for optimism, the government has warned that the situation on the ground remains "very difficult".

Militants from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) have taken over vast swathes of territory as they advance on Baghdad, amid fears that the country could fall apart.

With details of the abduction sketchy, other families said they feared for the fate of the workers, who had been earning money on construction projects to send back home.

"We are hearing all sorts of news from Iraq, visuals on the television are frightening and we are very worried about him," Ranjit Kaur told the Hindustan Times of her son Jatinder Singh.

Parkash Singh Bada -- chief minister of Punjab, where most of the workers come from -- said "we are ready to bear all the expenses for bringing them back."

Humanitarian agencies and the Iraqi government have confirmed the abduction of the workers, who were employed by the Tariq Noor Al Huda construction company, India's foreign ministry said.

About 10,000 Indian nationals are currently in Iraq with some 100 caught in violence-hit areas, the ministry added.


Source : Sapa-AFP /mr
Date : 19 Jun 2014 08:22
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X