The official Mikrotik router thread

Quiet the opposite. People have been complaining about the performance of their ARM based AC kit for years now, and its not even settings related. Most WISP's are moving away from Mikrotik for wireless, way better options out there for wireless. When 2GHz was still the best and only option for Wireless Mikrotik was good. same goes for normal 5GHz. Once we got AC they just fell behind. For routing Mikrotik is good. For Wireless its not.
I probably should have qualified that a bit better, for home wireless its fine.
I have 2 Unifi AP lite's in my house, many people also told me about how limited they are for throughput etc etc but its never negatively affected me.
Heck your wifi network at home is almost always going to have more bandwidth than your internet connection so a slight performance loss wont be noticeable.
 
Are there any Mikrotik specialists on this thread that can assist with troubleshooting on a somewhat complex setup? A friend needs help with his network, he has multiple VLAN's and is having trouble with the internet connection.

Please PM and I'll send you the his contact details or I'll get him to contact you.
 
Every time I set up a new mikrotik I generally also have a pi-hole on the network or just a local DNS server but then I always find myself wasting time googling for the correct firewall rules to route the dns traffic to the raspberry pi.
So I decided to bookmark it by writing it down https://erikthiart.com/blog/redirect-all-dns-traffic-on-port-53-to-pihole.php I hope this helps you guys 2 years from now when Eskom breaks your router and you forgot to make a backup script and now have to setup your pi hole and mikrotik instance again after 5 years of not touching it. (you know the mikrotik life -- drain your soul for 3 days and then you never touch that thing again, ever.)
 
So - the RB4011 is hopefully on its way - second hand deal. planning to pair with a NanoHD AP. havent touch mikrotik before so this should be interesting..planning to install the RB, add the AP, then add a Rain 5g and 20mbps vumareach fibre line loadbalanced.

once that is working i will try to setup VPN.

Long term its setting up a wireguard VPS to get around CGNAT/Double NAT.

Okay - So RB4011 arrived today - first order of business is to test it by setting it up with my fibre connection. Maar my vok marelize...took me a while to get it setup. gave up then switch to my fibre wireless directly. then suddenly it started working...

eish this is gonna give me a paar kopseer until i understand it.
 
Okay - So RB4011 arrived today - first order of business is to test it by setting it up with my fibre connection. Maar my vok marelize...took me a while to get it setup. gave up then switch to my fibre wireless directly. then suddenly it started working...

eish this is gonna give me a paar kopseer until i understand it.
Hahaha may the force be with you...

Shout on here if you get stuck
 
Okay - So RB4011 arrived today - first order of business is to test it by setting it up with my fibre connection. Maar my vok marelize...took me a while to get it setup. gave up then switch to my fibre wireless directly. then suddenly it started working...

eish this is gonna give me a paar kopseer until i understand it.
Thats still the easy part,wait till you get to proper guts of it
 
Calling all network engineers, gurus, self taught maestros...need some help.

So after some considerable time i have setup my RB4011 to work with my fibre connection. I am new to mikrotik and not experienced in networking concepts (i know how to fiddle, follow instructions etc).

So i have a vumareach (VR) fibre connection which comes with an all in one cheapo ONT/Router. Problem is, this ONT/router is completely locked down - no access to any settings whatsoever and vuma have no intent on assisting.

So no bridge mode, no ip passthrough, no DMZ functions. you cant even switch off the wifi, DHCP, etc. All they have is a bespoke portal to change your wifi password. (why they do this and how crappy it is, is for another discussion :))

The router sits on the 192.168.18.x range with the router IP on 192.168.18.1.

I have setup my router from port 1 of the VR router to the mikrotik and setup a basic connection using quickset. the problem i have is this causes double NAT.

is there any way to get around this? (besides getting another ISP/internet service :) - no option)
 
Last edited:
You will need to speak to Vumatel.
That device is capable of bridge mode (I actually just grabbed one to test it out - but a team member has told me it is capable).
 
You will need to speak to Vumatel.
That device is capable of bridge mode (I actually just grabbed one to test it out - but a team member has told me it is capable).

Thanks for checking..

No joy from ISP or VUMA - they gave customers some technical explanation of why they cannot (and will not assist) - which is not what we wanna hear, but that is for another discussion.

So to confirm there is not way of getting around this with the mikrotik?
 
Last edited:
Who is the ISP?
Maybe ask to escalate it to someone in the network department

afrihost. This has been requested/escalated but no luck. apparently the VR is a different business model. all the ISPs on VR say the same thing really - and pushes it to Vuma - who come up with the same response.
 
I assume they want to run VOIP over this connection and that is why you are worried about double NAT

my concerns are more around potential gaming, remote access, port forwarding issues. i have plans to access my NVR, play games, setup remote access etc.
 
well you can test it with teh RB4011 and see if you do have remote access or not. If you do then you are fine.
Never seen double NAT cause issues with gaming
 
Afaik,is what it is,you could get a VPN tunnel going to get yourself a reachable public IP,but VR have the device itself pretty locked down
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X