PaulNOTsaul
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2018
- Messages
- 4,394
- Reaction score
- 2,989
You don't need deputy ministers, however small the cabinet. The DGs are responsible for the day to day stuff, and will increase her count in the department as needed...
I'm going to go upstream on this one, I think you do need a deputy minister, to preside over a department is a huge task, nevermind the ceremonial tasks, a minister needs as much consultation as possible in reaching to particular decisions that would have a great impact on society. Cost is almost nothing if their roles are well played.
Think of them as consultants, in a perfect world Deputy Ministers would be the one cutting ribbons and hearing what people want relaying that to the Minister, wherein the Minister reconciles that with the expert opinions from the executive, literature. A deputy will attend to Parliament for all minor session e.g Q&A, receiving political party guides.
It's taxing work to deal with all the bureaucracy, a DM is a good idea, leaving the Minister to deal with the technocratic elements of running the Department.
If the majority of US Congress doesn't even read a bill before voting for it, because they have "no time" , how much time do you think a Minister has between Parliament, Party work, lending a ear to the everyday man, Department work?