Fulcrum29
Honorary Master
Don't really care for the DLC's. Too expensive for me.
Is it not on Game Pass?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Don't really care for the DLC's. Too expensive for me.
Gamepass seldom give you DLC's for free. Usually only the simplest form of the base game.
I think I have around 150 hours, but the first 60 was just a struggle with my PC. Felt like a different game. SSD helped but the RTX just adds realism and depth that wasn't there with the GTX.Lol, I knew. First party games on a subscription service being upsold with DLC add-ons, who would have thought. I have the Premium Edition which includes Shattered Space and some Creation Credits. Haven't installed it. Now I am waiting on the DLC, which is guestimated to be two more, one to be released in 2025 and the other, which may or may not happen, to be released in 2026. Each which will likely be $30 or more. Without Creation add-ons, the complete package will be ~ R3 500. That is a lot.
I don't expect more quality above the current, perhaps some QoL improvements and story since the development teams will move on to The Elder Scrolls, and Fallout IP. Say Indiana Jones is good, then this game will be in some maintenance void. They will move to where the money is made.
On the positive side, it has been hitting the 33% discount mark on Steam since March. I do expect a 40% Summer Sale on Steam, and then 50-60% in 2025, perhaps 70% by the next Summer Sale. Next year this time, the Premium Edition could potentially be a ~R600 title, R 1000 with the new DLC (discounted).
Early buyers are always licking Bethesda's balls.
People love the game though, I have seen many people with +100 hours in the game, some +300 hours, some +1000 hours. Eventually I will add my hours too.
I think I have around 150 hours, but the first 60 was just a struggle with my PC. Felt like a different game. SSD helped but the RTX just adds realism and depth that wasn't there with the GTX.
Fallout 4 was really amazing with the mod support and really enjoyed the settlement building and management. The Skyrim was also amazing but I got a bit bored. None of these games I ever finished as I was too distracted.
Starfield is very different and plays more like a linear FPS than an open world action RPG to me. In a way my kind of game.
I still appreciate the level of detailing in the assets and someone put a lot of effort in. Too bad that it doesn't have the depth of Skyrim or Fallout. They must just allow the modding community to finish the game and unlock as much as possible. Even hand over the game engine.![]()
**chirp chirp**
And how was it?
It will likely be DLC gated. This DLC might come with a premium. I assume it will be like what Phantom Liberty did to enhance Cyberpunk 2077.After doing my todd affirmations and salutations it seems Stanfield 2.0 is here?
The only good part was ship building simulator...It will likely be DLC gated. This DLC might come with a premium. I assume it will be like what Phantom Liberty did to enhance Cyberpunk 2077.
They might even dangle it as a way to get users back onto Game Pass.
I will have to wait and see, the game was massively boring.
The only good part was ship building simulator...
After doing my todd affirmations and salutations it seems Stanfield 2.0 is here?
Ah, but then he dropped the hammer. "It is not Starfield 2.0. I've seen some of that—for expectation-setting, I think it's the kind of thing where, if you love Starfield, we think you're gonna love this. It's updates and things that change the game, not in an isolated way, but sort of meta, using outer space and things in ways that we haven't.
"But look, is Starfield something that didn't connect with you right away, or you bounced off it or found it boring in places—I don't think this is going to change that fundamentally."
Dink jy het die genot dildo in jou ass vergeet of jy kort een. Daars n patroon hier. LOL.![]()
Todd Howard says there's no Starfield 2.0 coming: The next big update is for people who already love Starfield, and if you don't, 'I don't think this is going to change that'
Bethesda will start talking about the future of Starfield "really soon," but he warned that it may not be all that some fans are hoping for.www.pcgamer.com
Thank you, Todd.
Dink jy het die genot dildo in jou ass vergeet of jy kort een. Daars n patroon hier. LOL.
They're still messing around with Starfield?? We're never getting Elder Scrolls 6.
Not sure either because all their rpgs pretty much follows the same formula. Maybe he means back to one massive, living, breathing, single player open world that made Elder Scolls and Fallout so massively popular. Their later games, Fallout 76 was a dumb multiplater game and Starfield was an experiment that didn't exactly work out. Was lifeless and empty.according to Todd, it will be a return to a "classic" like the previous TES games. I don't know what he meant by saying that.
Meh, it's lifeless. No NPC's to roll play with. It has beauty and discovery but it lacks soul.Starfield 2 has been out for ages.... Its called No man sky![]()
Well NMS = 2016Starfield 2 has been out for ages.... Its called No man sky![]()