FiestaST
Honorary Master
Tesla Model 3 VS Polestar 2: Shootout | Fifth Gear Recharged
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Tesla Model 3 VS Polestar 2: Shootout | Fifth Gear Recharged
That's weird that's not what I've been hearing - OHHHhhh, Jalopnik, nevermind, makes perfect sense now. They probably went searching for the one person in the world who doesn't like the latest 3. They only do anti-Tesla pieces. For at least 3 years that I know of.Model 3 Owner Says Tesla "Cheaped Out" On Quality For 2022
After upgrading from a 2021 Model 3 to a 2022, he's "disappointed" by the interior and exterior
The used car market right now is, in a word, wild. People who recently picked up a new car are finding themselves beset on all sides by buyers who want to pay top dollar — even above sticker price. Such was the situation with one Tesla Model 3 owner in Connecticut, who was given an offer he couldn’t refuse for his 2021 Model 3 Long Range. He replaced it with a 2022 Model 3 Performance, but now feels the quality has sharply dropped from his old car.
It’s unusual to have two near-identical cars from different model years to compare between, but YouTuber Legend17 had just that. He had agreed to sell his 2021 Model 3 Long Range already, but the company that agreed to buy it hadn’t yet picked it up by the time he bought his new 2022 Model 3 Performance. With both cars sitting in his driveway, he decided to make some comparisons on fit and finish. Now, he might be wishing he hadn’t looked so closely.
Legend17 begins with the exteriors of both cars, pointing out the differences that come with the Performance trim level compared to the Long Range. Then, he goes into the panel gaps, and things start to get interesting. Gaps on the red 2022 are clearly larger and less consistent than the white 2021, though panel alignment and color matching seem to have been improved.
This begets a question that no one should really have to ask, but Tesla has forced into our collective minds: Which exterior build quality issues are livable, and which aren’t? By my own tastes, the red car’s exterior seems more competently assembled — I’d rather live with panel gaps than entire panels of mismatched paint.
https://jalopnik.com/model-3-owner-says-tesla-cheaped-out-on-quality-for-2-1848173101
That's weird that's not what I've been hearing - OHHHhhh, Jalopnik, nevermind, makes perfect sense now. They probably went searching for the one person in the world who doesn't like the latest 3. They only do anti-Tesla pieces. For at least 3 years that I know of.
(That being said, build quality out of Fremont is still sometimes inconsistent - it's an old, cobbled together factory. Chinese Teslas are wayyy better. As will be Texas and Germany soon).
Will take your word for it. Jalopnik's on my "don't give them clicks" list. Along with several "reputable" financial websites. And Consumer Reports. Learned the hard way.Initially I was thinking that but watch the YT vid. One compares side by side the MY 2021 vs the 2022. His owned both so his opinion does count in some form.
Determining what year a car is can actually prove to be a trickier question than you’d think. The year the car was actually manufactured is a huge part of it, of course, but what about a car made from unused old stock? Or there’s the case of VW’s mascot Beetles, named Max, all of which look like 1963 cars but were actually built in 1964. Currently, this question is on my mind because Tesla seems to be selling a lot of 2021 Model 3s that may come with battery packs built in 2017. What’s going on?
These first came to my attention from an email from a buyer of one of these cars from a series of tweets from Seth Horowitz, a man with a well-educated Rodney Dangerfield profile pic who had found a lot of Model 3s for sale all across the country—he saw examples in Denver, Los Angeles, Miami, Portland, and even Honolulu, for example, and all of these locations had 2021 Model 3s for sale, at prices not appreciably less than other 2021 Model 3s, that bore this unusual disclaimer:
“Range figures may be up to 12% lower due to battery age,” it reads, and then offers you an opportunity to “Learn More.” Okay, let’s learn more:
The “Range Disclaimer” states
![]()
This is a bit confusing, for a number of reasons. First, why is there a 2017 pack being used in a 2021 car, even if that car is explained to be a “demo car?” Second, when it says “this pack was brand new when the vehicle was built, the cells have reduced capacity due to their age” (emphasis mine), what does that, mean, exactly?
The pack was brand new when the vehicle was built? What vehicle? The 2021 Model 3 that’s being sold with the pack, or another one that could be as old as one from 2017? I can’t quite make sense of this.
I understand the concept of New Old Stock (NOS) parts, of course, and that’s what this seems to be, but I’m thrown by the mention that the pack was new when the vehicle was built, because that can’t be true if the car was built as a 2021 model unless the car is potentially as old as a 2017 model, in which case why is that four-going-on-five-year-old car being sold as a 2021 car?
I’d reach out to Tesla for help, but as we all know, I may as well reach out to the giant, gregarious rat known as Charles Emerson Cheese, or more commonly, Chuck E. Cheese, as both he and Tesla’s PR/Media relations department are equally real.
Now, it’s not like Tesla is hiding this information, exactly—the disclaimer (confusing as it is) and the notice that the range could be up to 12 percent lower is right there on the site—but considering how important batteries are to an EV, I’m not convinced a 2021 car with a potentially 2017 battery pack should be sold as a 2021 car.

TOLD you guys not to click on Jalopnik.Tesla Appears To Be Selling New Cars With Batteries From 2017 - Jalopnik
I'm sort of confused as to exactly what's going on here but it's worth talking about
![]()
![]()
Tesla Appears To Be Selling New Cars With Batteries From 2017 - Jalopnik
Determining what year a car is can actually prove to be a trickier question than you’d think. The year the car was actually manufactured is a huge part of it, of course, but what about a car made from unused old stock? Or there’s the case of VW’s mascot Beetles, named Max, all of which look like...jalopnik.com





The Tesla Model 3 is on course to be Europe’s best-selling full-electric vehicle in 2021 amid strong gains in overall sales of battery-electric vehicles.
Sales of the Model 3 jumped 84 percent to 113,397 through November, according to data from JATO Dynamics market researcher.
Volkswagen’s ID3 compact hatchback is likely to be at No. 2. ID3 sales rose 125 percent to 63,109 in the first 11 months.
The Renault Zoe, 2020's best-selling EV is on track to be No. 3. Through 11 months, Zoe sales were 60,551, down 27 percent.
The Model 3 last topped the European EV charts in 2019. In September, the compact sedan was the first full-electric car to become Europe’s best-selling car overall for the month, outperforming regular topsellers with internal combustion engines such as the VW Golf and Renault Clio.
Last summer, Tesla began rolling out a new infotainment computer called the MCU3 (no relation) in its high-end Model S and Model X vehicles.
Not only did the new computer include a faster processor, enabling smoother navigation through the car’s menus, it also contains a dedicated graphics processing unit — enabling the sort of detailed rendering necessary to guide Geralt of Rivia through the Continent.
Months later, Tesla gave the Model 3 and Model Y the same upgrade, but the cheaper cars show the true cost of all that computing power: Range.
New Model 3 buyers in Australia are being informed that their cars will ship with less range than advertised.
The reduction isn’t huge, only about 13 miles less than the initial ratings, but it’s enough that some regulatory bodies require Tesla to get buyers’ consent before actually selling them the vehicle.