A lot of things are...Interesting. I only hope his ban was decided objectively - this is becoming increasingly questionable...
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
A lot of things are...Interesting. I only hope his ban was decided objectively - this is becoming increasingly questionable...
Seems like insulting the soapbox you are standing upon isn't the best way to stay there.
yea
there are better ways of irritating your downstairs neighbor than continually shooting yourself in the foot !
Possible that a mod could give us the reason Sonic was banned?
Possible that a mod could give us the reason Sonic was banned?
An outright ban is very rare, the exceptions being spammers and clones of previously banned users. It is also the absolute final step and the decision is not taken easily nor in isolation. The bossman is not in favour of banning members, especially long time members and it is truly the last thing that anybody wants to do.If it was a mod. First of all.
But yea the banning is a bit toight lately.
A lot of time gets invested in these forums I almost have 10k posts I can promise you if the ban hammer just happens to fall upon me I would get a little upset due to the time that one committed to this forum just to be taken away from you
An outright ban is very rare, the exceptions being spammers and clones of previously banned users. It is also the absolute final step and the decision is not taken easily nor in isolation. The bossman is not in favour of banning members, especially long time members and it is truly the last thing that anybody wants to do.
The overwhelming majority of bannings are due to an accumulation of infraction points. There is discussion around this as it is (in my opinion) unfair on long time members who have accumulated the odd, non-expiring infraction points over the years (me included!!). All it takes is a bad day or three and that user could be over the 10 point threshold.
/peeks at infraction list
Why are you concerned?![]()
I love a dare :twisted:[XC] Oj101;16213234 said:I'd ban you for a day :twisted:
An outright ban is very rare, the exceptions being spammers and clones of previously banned users. It is also the absolute final step and the decision is not taken easily nor in isolation. The bossman is not in favour of banning members, especially long time members and it is truly the last thing that anybody wants to do.
The overwhelming majority of bannings are due to an accumulation of infraction points. There is discussion around this as it is (in my opinion) unfair on long time members who have accumulated the odd, non-expiring infraction points over the years (me included!!). All it takes is a bad day or three and that user could be over the 10 point threshold.
/peeks at infraction list
Why are you concerned?![]()
I am concerned. Infraction here are like those numbers gang tattoos are in prison. They are a sign of your importance , experience and most of all reputation./peeks at infraction list
Why are you concerned?![]()
I am concerned. Infraction here are like those numbers gang tattoos are in prison. They are a sign of your importance , experience and most of all reputation.
At the moment I get no respect on this forum because I am like that white collar criminal who defrauded a pension scheme and is in for 5 years.
I have to keep out of peoples way and have a tub of Vaseline handy if one of the hard core criminals (marine1, zewp, stochos, Paul Hjul, lightscribe, Ockie, morkhans etc)wants a good time.
What does one have to do around these here parts to get myself like a permenantly infraction (stick on tats don't count)
Proof or GTFOOpenweb are definitely still sharing accounts on certain of their products. FACT.

Proof or GTFO![]()
What does one have to do around these here parts to get myself like a permenantly infraction (stick on tats don't count)
Sign me up too please I need a battle scar.
Would like one for my 10000th postday