South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.

Trial, conviction, immediate execution. That's how it should be.
Unless you are innocent.
In the US it usually costs more to execute someone than to keep them in jail for life. The appeals process costs a fortune.
So death even if you're innocent just because you were convicted? There's a reason you can appeal, no judicial system is perfect.
Hence including Conviction in my post.
Tough, there would be some casualties but in the greater scheme of things far less than now.
I bet you wouldn't have the same attitude if a loved one was wrongly convicted and executed.
Tough, there would be some casualties but in the greater scheme of things far less than now.
Originally Posted by Polish View Post
Trial, conviction, immediate execution. That's how it should be.
His latest attorneys, however, found that Velez, could not have been responsible for the injuries that killed the boy, since he was working a construction job in the state of Tennessee 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) away, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
police misconduct, prosecutorial deception
DEATH ROW INMATE FREED AFTER YEARS BEHIND BARS
A man convicted of murder and awaiting execution was exonerated and walked free Wednesday after nine years behind bars in Texas, anti-death penalty groups said.
And I'll wager that neither the police nor the prosecutor are charged/censured in any way at all.
Which crimes would you advocate the death penalty for ?
Murder, rape ?
How about those that destroy lives without actually involving a killing ?
Would you execute priests who prey on children ?
How about J Arthur Brown - doesn't he deserve to be killed for destroying so many lives - including those who committed suicide as a result of his actions ?