Thermal paste - how do you prefer to apply it ?

howardb

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2003
Messages
3,654
Method 1 for me... will try the cross method on my next build ;)
 

mintydroid

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
1,872
In 2004 I had to rebuild my PC as the mobo and psu blew. Decided to upgrade the CPU at the same time. I'd never had to do anything like that before. I struggled through it and got the beast operational again. It was only about three years after that, that I discovered that you needed thermal paste for the job. I hadn't used any. I also broke one of the clips for the CPU heatsink.

The machine is still working to this day without an issue. No thermal paste and broken heatsink and all...

You should slap on some paste. Its dirt cheap. The cpu won't heat up as much when it's on.
 

DJ...

Banned
Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
70,287
You should slap on some paste. Its dirt cheap. The cpu won't heat up as much when it's on.

If it conks out then so be it. It had a good innings. I'm hardly geeky enough to want to do that sort of thing. Besides, it's worked this long. Clearly the thing operates on magic...
 

DA-LION-619

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
13,777
I use a plastic bag as a glove and I apply a thin layer of paste to the CPU
 

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
I make a cross from corner to corner and then let the heatsync spread it.

I saw an article about how to apply thermal paste on a hardware site once and they tested about 10 different ways to apply it, and the cross one gave the best results. I've been using that method ever since.

This one?

pic_disp (1).jpg

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Thermal-Paste-Application-Techniques-170/

Final conclusion? Think about it!

Michael Tran • a year ago
What would be the most optimal amount of paste and spread method for a processor without an integrated heatsink? For instance, a laptop processor with just the die coming into contact with the base of the heatsink?

Matt Bach
For something like that, I would use the smooth spread method. Getting perfect coverage on a non-square shaped die is going to be difficult unless you do the spreading yourself. If you are unsure if the coverage is good or not, it's usually a good idea to apply the thermal paste, install the heatsink, then remove the heatsink and see how well it spread. Check that the entire die is covered and that not too much was pressed out the sides. You will want to clean off the die and heatsink and reapply the thermal paste, but at least you will know for sure if you are using the right amount.
 
Last edited:

Seriously

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,596
My preference

http://www.frozencpu.com/resource/r8/How_to_Apply_Thermal_Paste.html

Very thin spread. Because?

Ideally, you will want to use slightly less material than the amount shown above. Just remember that once heat is applied to thermal grease the viscosity will thin and spread out towards the edges just a little more, allowing the surfaces to come into closer (or direct) contact with each other. Keep in mind that thermal paste is only meant to fill the gaps, not coat the surface; perfectly flat metal on metal with no material in-between is your ultimate goal.

n5He7lx.jpg

http://archive.benchmarkreviews.com...sk=view&id=150&Itemid=62&limit=1&limitstart=3

Some more info and test. Take note that less or just enough is better!

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/What-is-the-Best-Way-to-Apply-Thermal-Grease-Part-1/1303/10


imageview.gif
 
Last edited:

NomNom

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
5,018
Defiantly option 1, option 2 allows for air pockets and/or uneven spread of the paste.
 

sajunky

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
13,124
Defiantly option 1, option 2 allows for air pockets and/or uneven spread of the paste.
I disagree. There is no precise control on amount of compound. It can be too little or to much. And more important, it leads to a thick gap between surfaces. Small air pockets are not so important as the minimum distance requirement. If you worry about air pockets, apply paste to both sides, but it is easy to ovedose such way. I found that simply rotating radiator with light force (5 degrees lef-right few times) before clipping it on removes all excess compound and leaves no dry space inside.
 
Last edited:

crysis

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
3,463
I disagree. There is no precise control on amount of compound. It can be too little or to much. And more important, it leads to a thick gap between surfaces. Small air pockets are not so important as the minimum distance requirement. If you worry about air pockets, apply paste to both sides, but it is easy to ovedose such way. I found that simply rotating radiator with light force (5 degrees lef-right few times) before clipping it on removes all excess compound and leaves no dry space inside.

Nope:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hNgFNH7zhQ
 

sajunky

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
13,124
I have seen many cases of thick layer in the centre leaving 20% of the surface dry.
 

Syphonx

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
3,867
3. Put down 2 intersecting lines of thermal paste, essentially making an X.
 

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
60,677
Sensually, all over my body. Then I rub myself up and down against my CPU. It's just more fun that way...

uhm
this was about thermal paste - not other white bodily fluids !
 

grim

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
3,733
1

Most people also put way too much paste on which then oozes over the edges of the chip which pulls the heat there instead of allowing the heatsink to soak it up
 
Top