Time for Zuma to go

http://www.sowetan.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=475134

Nice and to the point. Wish the main man himself would just listen.

I don't think so...If the people nominate him that means as a comrade he must heed the call of duty. It's not up to him but the people can decide and seal his fate...No one in the ANC is without controversy at the moment. Zuma should be around to serve as a thorn in the side of those with presidential aspirations. They need to convince people that they are beyond reproach by showing strong leadership. Playing at Zuma's misfortunes is cheap...at some point Zuma will be gone probably to jail and then what...?
 
I don't think so...If the people nominate him that means as a comrade he must heed the call of duty. It's not up to him but the people can decide and seal his fate...No one in the ANC is without controversy at the moment. Zuma should be around to serve as a thorn in the side of those with presidential aspirations. They need to convince people that they are beyond reproach by showing strong leadership. Playing at Zuma's misfortunes is cheap...at some point Zuma will be gone probably to jail and then what...?

So you think it's ok for him to be in the running with all his "Issues" hanging over his head? I just feel that his reputation is way too tainted for him to even be considering standing for elections.
 
I don't think so...If the people nominate him that means as a comrade he must heed the call of duty. It's not up to him but the people can decide and seal his fate...

Of course its up to him whether to run for president! Once he's made that decision then if he decides to run its up to the electorate whether or not to elect him.

at some point Zuma will be gone probably to jail and then what...?

Then SA will be in a much better place.
 
Then SA will be in a much better place.

Agreed, but you wanna know what's funny? Zuma is not in charge of what is happening with his campaining/not campaining. My question though is why are ANCYL, Cosatu so against people declaring their availability to stand for elections?
 
Agreed, but you wanna know what's funny? Zuma is not in charge of what is happening with his campaining/not campaining. My question though is why are ANCYL, Cosatu so against people declaring their availability to stand for elections?

What do you mean he's not in charge? I agree he's probably a figurehead for certain interests like the ANCYL etc. but if he made a public statement tomorrow that he wasn't interested and wasn't going to run it'd be pretty definitive. Presumably they're against people declaring availability because Zuma already has, although not officially, so if they can make him look like the only viable candidate it strengthens him. Not very democratic though.
 
Zuma will be the next president. :confused: :(

He is still the deputy president of the ANC, and the people will vote him in. :confused::(:(
 
Zuma will be the next president. :confused: :(

He is still the deputy president of the ANC, and the people will vote him in. :confused::(:(

You're forgetting that the people don't vote for a president in South Africa. That is all up to the regional branches of the ANC. Which is a shame if you ask me, because everyone knows how corrupt they are. They only think of their pockets. So ultimnately, the fact that this so called succession race will be determined behind close doors through underhand dealings and threats to individuals (If you don't vote for Zuma, you lose your overcompensated job). It's already started in KZN. Reports of smear campaigns, etc etc.

I suppose all of this is justified in the ANCYL's eyes because "ANC leaders don't campain" rather they "Get called up for duty".
Pathetic.
 
Last edited:
I suppose all of this is justified in the ANCYL's eyes because "ANC leaders don't campain" rather they "Get called up for duty".
Pathetic.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that exactly how it is here in South Africa? The South African people do not vote for a president, they vote for a party...
 
You're forgetting that the people don't vote for a president in South Africa. That is all up to the regional branches of the ANC. Which is a shame if you ask me, because everyone knows how corrupt they are. They only think of their pockets. So ultimnately, the fact that this so called succession race will be determined behind close doors through underhand dealings and threats to individuals (If you don't vote for Zuma, you lose your overcompensated job). It's already started in KZN. Reports of smear campaigns, etc etc.

I suppose all of this is justified in the ANCYL's eyes because "ANC leaders don't campain" rather they "Get called up for duty".
Pathetic.

Would you prefer something like the US-style primary system?
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that exactly how it is here in South Africa? The South African people do not vote for a president, they vote for a party...

Yes it is, and i have a big problem with that. Leaving such an important decision to a bunch of city officials who's jobs might be on the line depending on who they side with doesn't leve me with a warm feeling.
 
Would you prefer something like the US-style primary system?

As a matter of fact i would. That would mean that the people can judge the individual based on his actions and utterances. Currently the ANC even denies that there is a succession race going on, so the people don't have a clue who they want, or who's in the running. Whoever the ANC branches back, is gonna be our president.
 
As a matter of fact i would. That would mean that the people can judge the individual based on his actions and utterances. Currently the ANC even denies that there is a succession race going on, so the people don't have a clue who they want, or who's in the running. Whoever the ANC branches back, is gonna be our president.

It does seem like a better option, especially in a situation like here where the ANC president is the de facto SA president.
 
It does seem like a better option, especially in a situation like here where the ANC president is the de facto SA president.

Maybe there should be a restriction on that: maybe one like "The ANC president can not be the country's president"
 
Maybe there should be a restriction on that: maybe one like "The ANC president can not be the country's president"

Maybe but the practical effect would be negligible, the ANC would still effectively choose the country's president within its own structures. It would decentralise power a bit I suppose. IIRC the USSR put a similar restriction in place after Stalin, that one person couldn't be Communist Party Secretary-General and the country's president at the same time, or something similar. Not the best example to be following though. :D:eek:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X