Binary_Bark
Forging
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2016
- Messages
- 38,582
4 months laterShame man, were you able to find employment soon after?
4 months laterShame man, were you able to find employment soon after?
This is mostly the fault of upper management, yes the sugar tax did not help.
But the over estimation of profits had the company spend more money than it actually had, thus now leading to people being laid off and other assets being sold to try and get back some funds.
I just wanted to post that. I wonder if sugar tax helped cause this.
to my friend's family business ?4 months later
Are you going to change your username?4 months later
So who did they vote and who should they vote for next time?I doubt it. Sugar sells itself. It's hugely addictive. This was a management issue. These workers will now learn first hand just how much the government will help out here....and maybe next time, vote better
If they have any sense and learned anything not the DA. They will probably increase sugar taxes.So who did they vote and who should they vote for next time?
The job losses are due to sugar tax. The mismanagement of the finances has hit shareholders hard, but it didn't affect the production of sugar and if sugar was still selling all the workers would be needed to, well work, to get out of the financial mess. Which is mostly about property(I think)
Their problems are I think mainly related to how they valued land, so they were kept afloat by that more sugar sales during the times when sugar sales were down which happened now and then. If it was just sugar tax, it'd have impacted on the other players as well. Their accounting irregularities that led them here are from back before the sugar taxes.The job losses are due to sugar tax. The mismanagement of the finances has hit shareholders hard, but it didn't affect the production of sugar and if sugar was still selling all the workers would be needed to, well work, to get out of the financial mess. Which is mostly about property(I think)
I think they just overstated the value after that big fancy estate in Balito was so successful, but I don't think there is a market for to many more of those.Lots of their properties was earmarked for property development, but received head winds after the ANC announced they were planning to change our constitution regarding property rights.
Back to yorkie ?Are you going to change your username?
Doubtful , the sugar tax was meant to be paid by companies using sugar and not the customer ,in the end the customer got it (smaller soft drink size for same price).Could this be related to sugar cut backs and sugar tax?
LOLAre you going to change your username?
to my friend's family business ?
NoAre you going to change your username?