Trying anal for first time

@Arthur. Unfortunately the male G-spot is in that area and is very pleasurable to most bottoms. I don't believe they'd consider it abusive at all.
 
I think we are dealing with the less academic inclined in this thread that completely missed what Arthur was saying. I'll sum it up for you simpletons:

Biologically speaking, the vagina is the only intended place to insert a penis for sex/pleasure. But he doesn't care where you put it. He was kinda stating the obvious.
 
Poxy, just to reassure you: No, anal abuse does not weigh on my mind. Rather, normal vaginal sex with my wife fills my fantasy and imagination and my days and nights. ;)

It seems you're the person who has some rather odd notions. Assuming I'm some sort of biblical literalist is just one bit of nonsense fantasy. Repressed is another. I've been round the blocks you haven't even imagined yet, Poxy.
 
Hamster said:
You are back?
Click to expand...

Visiting. I still find the discussions very interesting. Not planning on engaging certain people on here anymore. Being PM'ed by those that want to chat instead. It least that way I won't be harassed by uncivilised cretins.
 
adinfinitum said:
Visiting. I still find the discussions very interesting. Not planning on engaging certain people on here anymore. Being PM'ed by those that want to chat instead. It least that way I won't be harassed by uncivilised cretins.
Click to expand...

I thought you left. did you lie?
 
Arthur said:
Poxy, just to reassure you: No, anal abuse does not weigh on my mind. Rather, normal vaginal sex with my wife fills my fantasy and imagination and my days and nights. ;)

It seems you're the person who has some rather odd notions. Assuming I'm some sort of biblical literalist is just one bit of nonsense fantasy. Repressed is another. I've been round the blocks you haven't even imagined yet, Poxy.
Click to expand...

Most of your posts come across as someone one step away from direct bible-bashing. That may not be your intention but its what it comes across as.
 
Arthur said:
Easy way out, Garson.

I'm being serious. And on topic. Just not the oh-so-conventional view.
Click to expand...

The non-group belief is of course trolling, next up is the mob teaching you a lesson.
 
Pox said:
Most of your posts come across as someone one step away from direct bible-bashing. That may not be your intention but its what it comes across as.
Click to expand...
No, it's what you infer.

You have a neat little box with a whole package of silly ideas, and you like to put me into it. I didn't mention it even obliquely refer to Sacred Scripture. If anything, I refer to biological science. It is you reading things into my posts. Now you can choose to do so and avoid engaging the topic, of course. I don't give a rat's anus, frankly.

Until you actually come up with a coherent thought on the points I raise and refrain from descending into personal slights, you just continue to show the shallowness of your, er, sentiments. One can hardly call them ideas.
 
Last edited:
Hamster said:
I think we are dealing with the less academic inclined in this thread that completely missed what Arthur was saying. I'll sum it up for you simpletons:

Biologically speaking, the vagina is the only intended place to insert a penis for sex/pleasure. But he doesn't care where you put it. He was kinda stating the obvious.
Click to expand...
Thanks, Hamster. You're a scholar and a gent. You get it.

I'll quibble only with one word: I actually do care.
 
Arthur said:
No, it's what you infer.

You have a neat little box with a whole package of silly ideas, and you like to put me into it. I didn't mention it even obliquely refer to Sacred Scripture. If anything, I refer to biological science. It is you reading things into my posts. Now you can choose to do so and avoid engaging the topic, of course. I don't give a rat's anus, frankly.

Until you actually come up with a coherent thought on the points I raise and refrain from descending into personal slights, you just continue to show the shallowness of your, er, sentiments. One can hardly call them ideas.
Click to expand...

Of course it's what I infer, how else must I relate to the world but via what I infer.
Still doesn't change the fact that you came into this thread and started spewing a whole bunch of rubbish about abuse. What 2 consenting adults do in private has absolutely **** all to do with you.

Lol... Refrain from personal insults and in the same sentence makes a personal insult.

You aren't fooling anyone.
 
Garson007 said:
No, you aren't being on topic. Someone asked for advice, whereas you are delivering judgement.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately Arthur is offering his advice.... and he is allowed to and we are allowed to call him out on it. I must say this for Arthur though - even though he is COMPLETELY WRONG :whistle: he is at least civil. Be happy it's not rza. In fact rza is the one guy I think I'll forgive myself for personal attacking.
 
Garson007 said:
No, you aren't being on topic. Someone asked for advice, whereas you are delivering judgement.
Click to expand...
No less a judgment than those who implicitly approve of his experiment.

I respect his liberty.

But that doesn't mean I think anything goes.

Most advise him to do it, and how.

I advise him to avoid it and to desist.

Both make judgments.

Besides, what gives you the idea one can't judge actions? We do it all day in and out of the courts. Your condemnation and mockery of my views is a judgement. I have never said you can't make them.

(The theological prohibition against judgement is very clear and very specific. It refers to an assessment of a person's state of grace or otherwise. Only God knows that. And I have never presumed to make that judgement about anyone other than myself. I am not making that judgment of the OP or anyone else. Hope that's not too subtle for you.)
 
Pox said:
Of course it's what I infer, how else must I relate to the world but via what I infer.
Still doesn't change the fact that you came into this thread and started spewing a whole bunch of rubbish about abuse. What 2 consenting adults do in private has absolutely **** all to do with you.

Lol... Refrain from personal insults and in the same sentence makes a personal insult.

You aren't fooling anyone.
Click to expand...
Look up the difference between infer and imply. Infer is what you do. Imply is what your interlocuter does. The former is what you read into the statement. It comes from you. The latter is what can be read from the statement, always respecting the text.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X