South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
An SJW is someone on the left who feels his opinions are indisputable and that they are justified in attacking anyone who so much as tries to debate them. This includes all those who believe/ believed they were justified in calling Trump a racist/sexist/homophobe/rapist/anti-semite/tyrant and attacking anyone who offered an argument that he wasn't. You know who you are.
The thing that a lot of you don't get is that labeling anyone you disagree with as an SJW is no different to those on the far left that label anyone they disagree with as a racist. We should be able to call BS out on both sides without the labels. BLM is bs, most modern day feminism is bs and alt right racist rhetoric is bs.
Call them what you like, they're *******s as far as I'm concerned. Who cares though? It's not like the mainstream narrative is overwhelmingly right wing.Whats the term for someone on the right who feels his opinions are indisputable and that they are justified in attacking anyone who so much as tries to debate them?
That's because the world can no longer sustain its delusions of prosperity and no one wants to wake up from the delusion.It's not only here. This is a world wide conundrum where people are too stuck in ideologies to discuss things that they want to discuss haha!
Conservatard, white nationalist, hitler...Whats the term for someone on the right who feels his opinions are indisputable and that they are justified in attacking anyone who so much as tries to debate them?
Conservatard, white nationalist, hitler...
Ja the left isn't as good at making up names that can easily be abbreviated or that make sense at all.
The thing that a lot of you don't get is that labeling anyone you disagree with as an SJW is no different to those on the far left that label anyone they disagree with as a racist. We should be able to call BS out on both sides without the labels. BLM is bs, most modern day feminism is bs and alt right racist rhetoric is bs.
Yup, peoples identifications with the ideologies are extreme!
How many people know what they really are? Yet it is so loosely spewed that they are, "this, this, this, this..."
Their egos are extremely established. There is no space in which to observe reality clearly because it is all drowned in ideology.
**** the left, **** the right. If we can't speak about things as innocent people then there is no point speaking at all. There needs to be compassion which is like love. Compassion is essential for meaningful communication. Without it, there is no interest in what the other person has to say. There is only Person A has A to say, and Person B has B to say... They are just saying A, and saying B... Without either side giving them the space to listen. The only possible thing that can happen is conflict.
I think everyone should at least go, wow. All these people chatting on this website are all deeply interested in politics and topics that require great intellect. Almost everyone here has that. So, it would be cool if people could listen to the other views.
Oh, you think topic A is a bad thing... Why do you think that? Oh, that's interesting... Oooh a can of worms.. Let's open that can of worms... Oooh, interesting... Instead it's Topic A; oh here's topic C, D, E and you're a leftist sjw, well you're a bigot here's topic F G H...
It's not only here. This is a world wide conundrum where people are too stuck in ideologies to discuss things that they want to discuss haha!
Where is the middle we need?!Is humanity always destined to be a seesaw because we don't have the ability to not be extreme in either direction?
Well, for one thing we have to stop the idea of ruling through a winner-takes-all popularity contest. Both sides have something to contribute, but each contribution requires a differing set of first principles in order to function. But people generally can't see this and so they attack the other side as the "source of the problem" and civic chaos spirals out of control from there relative to the general anxiety of the populace.Where is the middle we need?!Is humanity always destined to be a seesaw because we don't have the ability to not be extreme in either direction?