Two executed in US with unapproved drugs

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,607
Reaction score
10,251
Location
District 9
Two men were executed in the United States on Wednesday with a drug not yet approved by federal authorities, after the Supreme Court denied one of the inmate's final appeal.

In Texas, which has put to death more people than any other US state, prison authorities said Michael Yowell was pronounced dead at 7:11 pm (0011 GMT).

His execution was delayed by an hour pending his final appeal to the highest court in the land, said Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman Jason Clark.

Yowell was sentenced to death for killing his parents when he was 28 years old after stealing money from them to buy drugs. He had also opened a gas valve so that the house would explode.

In Arizona, 71-year-old Edward Schad died at 10:12 am (1712 GMT), prisons spokesman Doug Nick told AFP.

"Well, after 34 years, I'm free to fly away home," said Schad, strapped to the execution table. "Thank you warden. Those are my last words."

Schad was sentenced to death for the 1978 murder of a 74-year-old whose corpse was found with a cord around its neck eight days after he left for a road trip.

Both Schad and Yowell were executed using a lethal injection with a new barbiturate customized by a compounding pharmacy.

The US Food and Drug Administration has not yet approved the drug.

Several US states are facing a shortfall of pentobarbital, an anesthetic used to euthanize animals, since the Danish producer refused to provide it for executing humans.

Yowell had sought to delay his execution by joining two other death row inmates in suing Texas over a change in the source of pentobarbital, warning it has "a high risk of excruciating pain."

Schad had argued that the barbiturate used for lethal injections in Arizona had not been approved by federal regulators.

His case did not go all the way up to the Supreme Court, and his appeals ended in an appeals court. The high court rejected Yowell's appeal.

Texas and several other states have turned to compounding pharmacies to make customized supplies. They face suits from inmates who warn of potentially contaminated products.

Yowell's lawyers said Texas authorities only revealed information about the drug they were going to use for his execution a week before it was set to take place.

"This shift to compounded drugs is a dramatic change from prior practice, making the need for oversight -- now and in the future -- that much more important," Maurie Levin and Bobbie Stratton said.

"Surely this is not the way we want our government to carry out its most solemn duty."

Compounding pharmacies -- which are regulated by local US state authorities and not federal, national ones -- sparked a scandal in November 2012, when one such company was deemed responsible for a deadly meningitis outbreak because of poor hygiene.

Schad and Yowell's were the 29th and 30th executions so far this year in the United States -- the first in Arizona and the 14th in Texas.


Source : Sapa-AFP /ma
Date : 10 Oct 2013 04:24
 
Texas and several other states have turned to compounding pharmacies to make customized supplies. They face suits from inmates who warn of potentially contaminated products.
Because you don't want to get sick when you're dead.
Yowell had sought to delay his execution by joining two other death row inmates in suing Texas over a change in the source of pentobarbital, warning it has "a high risk of excruciating pain."
I fail to see the problem here.
 
Several US states are facing a shortfall of pentobarbital, an anesthetic used to euthanize animals, since the Danish producer refused to provide it for executing humans.

Hmm, maybe we can export it to them and make some moola.
 
I fail to see the problem here.

Barbarity and savagery, perhaps?

Nothing like claiming to be civilised, follow some sort of superior moral integrity when it suits you and then shrug it all off and say, "Screw it, let them suffer" when it doesn't.

The idea, obviously lost on some, is to be "better" than the criminals and not sink to their level. I guess some of us don't have it in us to be better than them, we just managed to live on the opposite side of the fence so far.
 
Barbarity and savagery, perhaps?

Nothing like claiming to be civilised, follow some sort of superior moral integrity when it suits you and then shrug it all off and say, "Screw it, let them suffer" when it doesn't.

The idea, obviously lost on some, is to be "better" than the criminals and not sink to their level. I guess some of us don't have it in us to be better than them, we just managed to live on the opposite side of the fence so far.

So what is your solution to violent crime in general and murders?
 
oh they went quickly. too quickly in fact that they couldn't inform the authorities that they were in any form of pain. sorry no cruelty here, nothing to see move along now.
 
They do receive a tranquilliser first, and they make sure no animals come to harm during the procedure
 
Barbarity and savagery, perhaps?

Nothing like claiming to be civilised, follow some sort of superior moral integrity when it suits you and then shrug it all off and say, "Screw it, let them suffer" when it doesn't.

The idea, obviously lost on some, is to be "better" than the criminals and not sink to their level. I guess some of us don't have it in us to be better than them, we just managed to live on the opposite side of the fence so far.

I am sorry Lycan ... but I cant say my heart bleeds for these two. Good riddance.
 
So what is your solution to violent crime in general and murders?

I don't recall debating the death penalty. I'm arguing the method of execution--i.e. unapproved narcotics.

I am sorry Lycan ... but I cant say my heart bleeds for these two. Good riddance.

And yet cry the beloved country when an innocent man ends up being executed in a barbaric fashion. Who cares about the minority, right?
 
And yet cry the beloved country when an innocent man ends up being executed in a barbaric fashion. Who cares about the minority, right?

The bolded and underlined word being important though Lycan. I am talking about punishment for someone (or in many cases, something) that commited a terrible terrible crime. A crime that can never be undone and families that will mourn lost loved ones forever.

I believe the rights of the innocent should be defended at all cost and the rights of the murderers must be revoked.
 
Well torture and confinement for 34 years isn't the answer obviously because people are still doing it. Maybe a swift death penalty system would make some in roads?

Well done that's the first sensible post I read from you in a long time and I agree with you.

Do it the Asian way swiftly and cheaply!
 
Last edited:
The bolded and underlined word being important though Lycan. I am talking about punishment for someone (or in many cases, something) that commited a terrible terrible crime. A crime that can never be undone and families that will mourn lost loved ones forever.

I believe the rights of the innocent should be defended at all cost and the rights of the murderers must be revoked.

It is impossible to be 100% certain in ALL cases. The important thing about humanity and civilised society is to not become the criminal. That means if you are going to perform the death penalty in your society that you do so in the most humane way possible.

That they couldn't grant their victims the same courtesy is not the point, "we" are not "them" that's WHY we, at the very least, execute them humanely.

Otherwise where do you draw the line? Is stoning acceptable? Or is that too barbaric?

You do not behave in the same way as criminals otherwise you become the criminal.
 
It is impossible to be 100% certain in ALL cases. The important thing about humanity and civilised society is to not become the criminal. That means if you are going to perform the death penalty in your society that you do so in the most humane way possible.

Oh ... sorry ... I think you misunderstood me. I also think it must be done humanely.
 
Bring back public stoning then or must the stones be approved first.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X