I got nothing... I don't consider myself an expert, just don't accept everything I read in western newspapers.
Its fairly logical, flows from basic economic principles.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I got nothing... I don't consider myself an expert, just don't accept everything I read in western newspapers.
Because its not logical or sustainable to set monetary policy globally which is what this amounts to. They're having enough problems within the EMU.
The problem for China is that if they want to continue to peg their currency at a weaker level to sustain export led growth they're going to need to continue to buy US$-denominated assets.
I got nothing... I don't consider myself an expert, just don't accept everything I read in western newspapers.
That was just a little citation added there....
For all of you that say China need the US to survive, They do need them for now, but China is buying up resources all over the world to ensure that it will be able to satisfy it's monstrous industrial needs. China is a fresh Industrialist country and have all the resources necessay to fulfil the needs of themselves and their neighbours. Just look how much dollars China is giving to eastern European countries and building economic partnerships with African countries.
The thing is China divesting out of the US dollar at some $100B +- per month and buying hard assets and real estate all over the world.
According to US apologists...
Don't sprout crap. What Syndre said is fact
You not trusting Western Media as an excuse for you being clueless on the topic.. Wow, weak hey. If you don't know what you are reading, don't reply.
Don't sprout crap. What Syndre said is fact
You not trusting Western Media as an excuse for you being clueless on the topic.. Wow, weak hey. If you don't know what you are reading, don't reply.
To me it looks like the west needs China more...
It's a globalised economy
Know what that means?
/facepalm
And you creditability dips ever so slightly
Its fairly logical, flows from basic economic principles.
Its fairly logical, flows from basic economic principles.
I think you'll find those principles are not widely known amongst the conspiracy theorist nutjobs. This thread is awash with imminent epic fail...
As logical as when the US bailed out the banks with a figure they pulled out their @ss
Or as logical as Madoff Investments that every hight street economist raved about.
Where does the imminent come in?