LancelotSA
Banned
Ok, I am getting confused with all these uncapped offerings so this thread is as much for me to summarise what it going on as it is for others to comment. I know we have threads on each one but I find myself constantly hopping between them! 
So.....
Screamer - [R399 uncapped 384k = Total of R551 (incl 384k line)] sounded good, no show when it came to delivering a decent service.
Digichilli - [R300 for 256k burstable = Total of R452 (incl 384k line)] sounded even better, but as more people are subscribing the speeds appear to be degrading. Work is said to be happening but will need to keep an eye on this. 256k service offered - burstable.
SAOL - [R499 incl 384k ADSL line - value R152] was frowned upon initially by many as you had to move your ADSL line but by all accounts speeds for downloads are good even during business hours. 384k service offered.
Cybersmart - [R514 for uncapped 384k service] no information on their website but apparently an offer similar to SAOL but at about R20 more per month
10/12/2009
Screamer - seemed to come and go without much attention from me. Almost as soon as I read about it I started seeing complaints.
Digichilli - I went from reading about it, to questioning it, to seriously considering it, to now taking a wait and see stance.
SAOL - I did not consider at first as it was the most expensive option. I am now seriously considering it as it seems to be the only one delivery what it promises.
Hmmm... what to do? I am paying R572 for my current 384k ADSL setup with a number of accounts...
27/12/2009
Screamer - So by some accounts Screamer seems to have improved. Still talk of shaping happening though.
Digichilli - Now appears to be dead in the water...
SAOL - Still sounding like a good option. So far the only negative anyone has come up with is changing the line across to them (something I do not have an issue with as my line is currently with Nashua anyway)
Cybersmart - Also sounds more and more interesting. Price is more expensive but there is a secret offering that is meant to come out soon. Trouble is I am not a fan of buying a product that I cannot read all the terms and conditions for...
So.....
Screamer - [R399 uncapped 384k = Total of R551 (incl 384k line)] sounded good, no show when it came to delivering a decent service.
Digichilli - [R300 for 256k burstable = Total of R452 (incl 384k line)] sounded even better, but as more people are subscribing the speeds appear to be degrading. Work is said to be happening but will need to keep an eye on this. 256k service offered - burstable.
SAOL - [R499 incl 384k ADSL line - value R152] was frowned upon initially by many as you had to move your ADSL line but by all accounts speeds for downloads are good even during business hours. 384k service offered.
Cybersmart - [R514 for uncapped 384k service] no information on their website but apparently an offer similar to SAOL but at about R20 more per month
10/12/2009
Screamer - seemed to come and go without much attention from me. Almost as soon as I read about it I started seeing complaints.
Digichilli - I went from reading about it, to questioning it, to seriously considering it, to now taking a wait and see stance.
SAOL - I did not consider at first as it was the most expensive option. I am now seriously considering it as it seems to be the only one delivery what it promises.
Hmmm... what to do? I am paying R572 for my current 384k ADSL setup with a number of accounts...
27/12/2009
Screamer - So by some accounts Screamer seems to have improved. Still talk of shaping happening though.
Digichilli - Now appears to be dead in the water...
SAOL - Still sounding like a good option. So far the only negative anyone has come up with is changing the line across to them (something I do not have an issue with as my line is currently with Nashua anyway)
Cybersmart - Also sounds more and more interesting. Price is more expensive but there is a secret offering that is meant to come out soon. Trouble is I am not a fan of buying a product that I cannot read all the terms and conditions for...
Last edited: