pieterb2020
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
They just block all incoming ports from their side, they thought they were doing Neotel users a favour. MTN/Vodacom does the same. P2P applications rely on incoming ports, because both parties act as a client and a server at the same time. Neotel has stated on their FAQ this fact after many users complained about incoming ports being blocked. I have yet to see a user replying to this forum that states it was removed.
Neotel is not the be-all and end-all, their prices are better for those that have high incoming/download requirements, but not for those that require hosting abilities e.g. WebCam/Game Server/Ftp/Http.
Now in reply to Benguela and Devo-sa:
Taking into account that Neotel is fairly new. Having a 4-bar signal is sometimes misleading. Even though iBurst appeared to be much more stable, Neotel requires different frequencies to operate. Every little thing can have an influence on the product. Most of the users stated that they are indeed happy with Neotel as long as it is a normal web type download (which is a separate issue). Now looking at frequencies here is a good article that will explain in Layman's terms how signal indication causes confusion.
Users like Benguela shouldn't give up and press hard on Neotel to get it fixed and do a proper investigation. This is certainly going to be a rough ride for those playing with a technology never used in this country before. Once Neotel opens up the incoming ports for those that requested it, we should see a decline in complaints of P2P not working.
My 2c
I contacted Neotel yesterday after I could not get incoming connection with U-Torrent, I was contacted today by Neotel to advise that all ports are now open.
Low and behold U-torrent gives me the green sign that every thing is now a-ok.
BUT - I can get a sustained download from HTTP at 17Kb's, but the moment I connect U-torent my overal internet download rate drops to below 5Kb's - what gives ?