US Election 2020 - Pt 3

Who do you think WILL win the 2020 US presidential election

  • Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D)

    Votes: 166 44.4%

  • Donald J. Trump (R)

    Votes: 208 55.6%
  • Total voters
    374
Status
Not open for further replies.
MightyQuin said:
Done Lemon - "we will have to burn this system down". Said on TV
Kamala Harris - "even after the elections the rioting will not and must not stop. This is only the beginning."

Wake the fuk up, libtard commie.
Click to expand...

Took all of 5 seconds to see this is false, both in actual quoted words and substance. Good job trying to convince you're not hooked on unhinged conspira-boomer stuff, MQ.
 
Kieppie said:
Wooooow. Semantics.
Scholar - a person who attends a school or studies under a teacher. So yes she was a Rhodes scholar in that sense. She did not say she has a scholarship. But yes not much is expected from CBS. Only slightly better than CNN.
Are you joining the bottom of the barrel club?
Click to expand...

I imagine if we lived in a parallel universe where being an Oxford Rhodes Scholar wasn’t a thing, you could post that and folk would read it uncritically.

Sadly, we live in this universe, where everything you just wrote makes you look like a bargain basement shill.

Stop it.

I’m embarrassed for you.
 
Kieppie said:
It;s easier to just say sorry and move on? There is a difference between scholar and scholarship. The reporter is a moron.

It's a full time job correcting the one side, but I'll keep my eyes open for obvious mistakes from the other side.
Click to expand...

Or she genuinely made a mistake/had incorrect information and thought she was a Rhodes Scholar instead of a student from Rhodes College. But you’d never admit to that possibility?

Anyway you’d think someone who graduated in the top 1% of their class would know a Rhodes Scholarship is prestigious enough not to use the term Rhodes Scholar any other way without ambiguity.
 
cerebus said:
Remember that time Trump wouldn't disavow David Duke because he claimed not to know who he was, even though he had previously denounced him several times?

Donald Trump’s absurd claim that he knows nothing about former KKK leader David Duke

"I don't know anything about David Duke."
www.politifact.com www.politifact.com

Just like yesterday he pretended not to know who the Proud Boys were.

And then there was the time a few months back when all the Neo-Nazi easter eggs were popping up in his merchandising

And the time he posted a video of a couple yelling "white power".

Trump doesn't blur the lines, so much as step right over the line then claim he doesn't know if there is a line.
Click to expand...

You're as looney as Jabu with his apartheid Israel views ........ nevermind reeeeing "my family, my time" when you don't want to answer people, you should get professional help.
 
Emjay said:
We have another guy who thinks that Trumps actions and words mean the opposite of what they are meant to.
Click to expand...
It wasn't trump's words I was calling out, it was yours. He's been promising to declare antifa a terrorist organisation for over a year, and hasn't, so I guess we'll see...
 
Temujin said:
nypost.com

Accused killer Kyle Rittenhouse plans to sue Biden for libel, attorney says

An attorney for Kyle Rittenhouse — who is accused of killing two protesters during demonstrations sparked by the police shooting of Jacob Blake – has announced plans to sue Joe Biden and his campai…
nypost.com nypost.com

EjLEYc4XYAI97Wc


:giggle:
Click to expand...

As mentioned before, please do. Please do.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1311358307878141952
 
C4Cat said:
It wasn't trump's words I was calling out, it was yours. He's been promising to declare antifa a terrorist organisation for over a year, and hasn't, so I guess we'll see...
Click to expand...

Yeah, I did make a mistake. I thought he got it through.

He should just do it using an EO, as I am sure he is battling to get it through the relevant agencies. Or is that an abuse of power?
 
abzo said:
Or she genuinely made a mistake/had incorrect information and thought she was a Rhodes Scholar instead of a student from Rhodes College. But you’d never admit to that possibility?

Anyway you’d think someone who graduated in the top 1% of their class would know a Rhodes Scholarship is prestigious enough not to use the term Rhodes Scholar any other way without ambiguity.
Click to expand...
Speaking for me now? Maybe I didn't include the "Wrong information" option since that should be a default reason as opposed to OP's claim that she lied.
Point of the matter is a scholar is not the same as a scholarship. I'd have preferred that she correct him like that.

And no 1% does not imply she should know.
 
Emjay said:
Yeah, I did make a mistake. I thought he got it through.

He should just do it using an EO, as I am sure he is battling to get it through the relevant agencies. Or is that an abuse of power?
Click to expand...

I’m old enough to remember conservatives wailing and rending their garments about Obama’s EOs

Something, something, rule by fiat, something.
 
greg0205 said:
I imagine if we lived in a parallel universe where being an Oxford Rhodes Scholar wasn’t a thing, you could post that and folk would read it uncritically.

Sadly, we live in this universe, where everything you just wrote makes you look like a bargain basement shill.

Stop it.

I’m embarrassed for you.
Click to expand...
Imagine institutes not being in the same country. They are American. Most of them don't know the difference between N.Korea and Australia. In other words they would default to an American institution.
I'm feeling embarrassed for you as well.
 
Kieppie said:
Wooooow. Semantics.
Scholar - a person who attends a school or studies under a teacher. So yes she was a Rhodes scholar in that sense. She did not say she has a scholarship. But yes not much is expected from CBS. Only slightly better than CNN.
Are you joining the bottom of the barrel club?
Click to expand...

CluelessPlasticArkshell-max-1mb.gif
 
Emjay said:
Kyle is taking the 5th?
Click to expand...

Kyle’s lawyer is exposing his client to discovery.

Lots and lots of civil discovery that will include motive and circumstance.

Lin Wood is an idiot.
 
Kieppie said:
Imagine institutes not being in the same country. They are American. Most of them don't know the difference between N.Korea and Australia. In other words they would default to an American institution.
I'm feeling embarrassed for you as well.
Click to expand...

Kayleigh is a Harvard grad.

She knows exactly what a Rhodes Scholar is.
 
greg0205 said:
I’m old enough to remember conservatives wailing and rending their garments about Obama’s EOs

Something, something, rule by fiat, something.
Click to expand...

I'm not a Conservative. Also, here, I did a little homework for you.

Google Search

www.google.com

Let's play a little game where we can spot the hypocrisy. If you can find it, I'll put myself to bed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X