US Election 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pegasus

Honorary Master
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
13,975
this is a stupid argument again since I can still contribute to charity.

The leftists on here like lumeer do not donate to charity and do not want to pay more tax.
They want other people’s money to pay for the free stuff and to help the needy.
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
He is a Republican Party member. While he represented the Republican Party in the House of Representatives (a political post) while he was also a board member of the Mises Institute.

So would the way he voted on Republican party lines not had any influence on what the Mises Institute researched or wrote about?
not by default no, PROVE that it happened or stop making accusations that you cannot prove, your assumptions are not proof fyi, your evidence is circumstantial at best, which is pathetic

LOL worst hand waving gas lighting BS attempt to deny a political connection
you high? you're the only one bringing up political connection, I'm talking about affiliation and influence, seeing as they are a "far right think tank" in your bizarre mind

they are happy to claim vaccines cause autism
yet more false claims, proof or STFU

You ignore Hitler's own written word on his political views
as should any rational person, you want to take the words of a madman over the observable actions he took?!?

Absolutely pathetic revisionism. Intellectually vacuous and dishonest.
confirmed, you are high as fahk
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
not by default no, PROVE that it happened or stop making accusations that you cannot prove, your assumptions are not proof fyi, your evidence is circumstantial at best, which is pathetic


you high? you're the only one bringing up political connection, I'm talking about affiliation and influence, seeing as they are a "far right think tank" in your bizarre mind


yet more false claims, proof or STFU


as should any rational person, you want to take the words of a madman over the observable actions he took?!?


confirmed, you are high as fahk
Here is an article from the Mises Institute pushing the MMR vaccine causes Autism BS.


Phone up the Philipines health department and ask them about MMR vaccines.
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
Here is an article from the Mises Institute pushing the MMR vaccine causes Autism BS
you're on a hot streak of lying today aren't you?

the article factually, correctly, objectively states:
one of the authors of that study, William W. Thompson, a senior scientist employed by the CDC, has admitted that critical data from the study was suppressed. Thompson released the following statement through his lawyer: “ I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism.”

they are quoting verbatim, and pointing out the intentional suppression of information and the conflicts of interest with government meddling, freedom of information FIY being a libertarian tenet, they offer no opinion on the possible link to autism themselves whatsoever

time for your next lie then I suppose?
 

lumeer

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
3,012
The leftists on here like lumeer do not donate to charity and do not want to pay more tax.
They want other people’s money to pay for the free stuff and to help the needy.

Oh, Peggy-Sue, naughty you... That's not what I wrote.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
LOL just LOL

Some facts:
1) Canada has a single payer healthcare system i.e. the government is 100% involved however supply of healthcare is privately owned so they have plenty of competition in who the gov buys the services from
2) Their pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated through their own FDA equivalent "Health Canada" and its associated agencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Canada

I can only conclude that you have no idea what you are talking about. Reality just does not fit your narrative.

So just another rietrot post then? Remarkable how many topics he's bafflingly ignorant on.

But don't you get it? Read my post again.

That is exactly what they are worried about. For them, it is literally murder. They aren't lying. There is no ulterior motive to the legislation.

They literally believe it is murder, because they believe that a 3 week old fetus is alive, and the termination of it is murder.

Just think about it from their point of view. Abortion clinics to them would like gas chambers.

Now don't say, "But they aren't literally gas chambers." The point is, different points of view. You will never convince them.

Remember, just in case I'm not clear, I already agree with you. Abortions for everybody (health circumstances permitting). But they don't, and they never will, and they are being honest when they say they believe it is murder.

Then why do Republicans back policies that will increase the amount of abortions, while Democrats back policies that will decrease it?

Yep. Trump has been mumbling about the 'import meds from canada' stuff... I'm guessing it should almost be ready(no doubt saving it for closer to november).

Would that be like the middle class tax cuts he pretended to have been working on in time for the 2018 mid-terms which was basically just a huge lie?

Temujin said:
Just the general mumblings about it over the years has caused prices to drop for first time since 70s(already 10% down). If it goes through as planned and allows people to import their generic meds from canada, local manufacturers are going to **** themselves

The Democratic House passed legislation for this in December already.


McConnell is the one refusing to bring it to the floor.

There's also a separate bipartisan bill in the Senate by Ron Wyden & Chuck Grassley.


Again, McConnell is the one refusing to bring it to the floor.

Nah, its not about that, when the abortion fails and a fully formed, breathing by itself, heart beating 'abortion' arrives, its a prem baby, spin it all you like with 'well technically she went for abortion, so technically its an abortion' bs, when it survives, and is breathing etc, its a premature baby /end. Requiring it to be treated as such medically shouldn't even be up for discussion, let alone requiring bills to be passed to enforce it

Your willingness and credulity to swallow completely bad faith propaganda is incredible.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
you're on a hot streak of lying today aren't you?

the article factually, correctly, objectively states:


they are quoting verbatim, and pointing out the intentional suppression of information and the conflicts of interest with government meddling, freedom of information FIY being a libertarian tenet, they offer no opinion on the possible link to autism themselves whatsoever

time for your next lie then I suppose?
Their integrity is so low they never bothered to fact check that the claim the CDC was suppressing data on an alleged link between the two.

It has since then been proven to be demonstrably false. https://www.factcheck.org/2018/12/rep-elect-green-wrong-about-vaccines-cdc-fraud/

Did the Mises Institute retract the article? Did they clarify that they sourced incorrect and false data?

Nope the article is still there as is, giving air to absolute BS, no caveats to state or clarify that the claims is factually incorrect and has no supporting evidence to the claim about the CDC.

The only ones lying are the Mises Institute.
 

NarrowBandFtw

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
27,727
Their integrity is so low they never bothered to fact check that the claim the CDC was suppressing data on an alleged link between the two.

It has since then been proven to be demonstrably false. https://www.factcheck.org/2018/12/rep-elect-green-wrong-about-vaccines-cdc-fraud/

Did the Mises Institute retract the article? Did they clarify that they sourced incorrect and false data?
They quoted the statement of a third party, quotes that are still his quotes, they did not introduce any data nor make claims based on it. There is nothing to retract seeing as what they printed is still factually correct. But hey I guess they should run off to factcheck.org or snopes instead right? :ROFL:

Nope the article is still there as is
Which is 100% accurate once you remove your BS interpretation from the mix ... btw it is a blog post by an individual contributor, but I guess pretending it's and article or official position gives apparent weight to your incorrect interpretation ... it doesn't btw, and incorrect remains incorrect

The only ones lying are the Mises Institute.
nope that's still you
 

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
ROLF





 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
Fabulous work by the FBI. Bust the Atomwaffen division in the USA. Another band of Neo-Nazis.

Of those, four were charged in the U.S. District Court in Seattle for allegedly sending racist and anti-Semitic threats to journalists and activists around the country and the fifth was charged in Virginia for his alleged participation in a swatting campaign.

So at least they got one bad guy and 4 internet trolls. Hopefully we get follow up news reports so that we can see if the trolling is actually a crime.
 

lumeer

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
3,012
Out of interest, what do the Trump fans here on MyBB think of coronavirus? I see that Rush Limbaugh compares it to the common cold and says it's being misused as a weapon against Trump.
 

lumeer

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
3,012
So Trump is suing the NYT over a 2019 opinion piece that he says contained false and libelous claims, namely that Russia aided the Trump campaign (which they did) because Putin favoured Trump over Clinton (which he did). Even if true, isn't it ironic that Trump should go after others for making false and libelous claims?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top