US Election 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
AlmightyBender said:
Tear gas and rubber bullets in response to eggs and water bottles
Live ammunition in response to stones and bricks

The above as the literal definition of police brutality. Literally.

Stop throwing out terms from Logic and Epistemology class if you don't know how to properly use them.
Click to expand...

And you accused Rietrot of being a fan of such - the definition of gaslighting but please continue to be condescending while you rant about bad faith debating.
 
Gnarls said:
And you accused Rietrot of being a fan of such - the definition of gaslighting but please continue to be condescending while you rant about bad faith debating.
Click to expand...
He said it himself..... Are you ok? Bolded the parts to help you. What he is describing is police brutality. He states numerous times that he is in favour of it.

What you are now doing is gaslighting on his behalf. Gaslighting here is denying the obvious position Rietrot takes that any reasonable person would conclude based on what he as written below.

rietrot said:
If you throw eggs I'm perfectly happy with police using non lethal means and shooting you with pepper balls.

If you throw something hard and heavy that can do serious damage like a water bottle I'm perfectly happy for the police to respond with live ammo.

Hooligans that throw shít make peaceful protest impossible for the rest of us. They should be delt with very harshly.
Click to expand...
 
AlmightyBender said:
He said it himself..... Are you ok? Bolded the parts to help you. What he is describing is police brutality. He states numerous times that he is in favour of it.

What you are now doing is gaslighting on his behalf. Gaslighting here is denying the obvious position Rietrot takes that any reasonable person would conclude based on what he as written below.
Click to expand...

Yeah, all I'm seeing is a massive reach to paint rietrot as a fan of police brutality thereby negating him and his position - troll behaviour. Furthermore, you're now gaslighting me as an irrational person for calling you out on your bs. But entertain us more with your good faith debate schtick.

Please get back to me when you actually get a clue.

/edit
here, in case you want to argue semantics like you usually do.

fan noun (2)
Definition of fan (Entry 3 of 3)
1: an enthusiastic devotee (as of a sport or a performing art) usually as a spectator
2: an ardent admirer or enthusiast (as of a celebrity or a pursuit)
Click to expand...
 
AlmightyBender said:
He said it himself..... Are you ok? Bolded the parts to help you. What he is describing is police brutality. He states numerous times that he is in favour of it.

What you are now doing is gaslighting on his behalf. Gaslighting here is denying the obvious position Rietrot takes that any reasonable person would conclude based on what he as written below.
Click to expand...
Want to see some videos of these peaceful protests?
 
https://twitter.com/x/status/1270314498994458626

Trump is in deep trouble - women vote at a higher rate than men and making gains with the white working-class (Trump's base). Biden would also be better with the WWC - he has that folksy appeal that Hilary never had. Also leading with the ballies - always look at that 65+ demographic, they usually pick the winning side.

Current electoral map according to the views of Ladbrokes punters. Think they are being a too optimistic about NC, Trump won that clearly in 2016. I am keeping my eyes peeled on Iowa here, there could definitely be value there.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1270257444065869824
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1270314498994458626

Trump is in deep trouble - women vote at a higher rate than men and making gains with the white working-class (Trump's base). Biden would also be better with the WWC - he has that folksy appeal that Hilary never had. Also leading with the ballies - always look at that 65+ demographic, they usually pick the winning side.

Current electoral map according to the views of Ladbrokes punters. Think they are being a too optimistic about NC, Trump won that clearly in 2016. I am keeping my eyes peeled on Iowa here, there could definitely be value there.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1270257444065869824
[/QUOTE]

Arizona is in play? more than a couple of paths to 270+are opening for Biden. November is a long way off ... more desperate Orange boy becomes, the more interesting this is going to get.
 
yebocan said:
Arizona is in play? more than a couple of paths to 270+are opening for Biden. November is a long way off ... more desperate Orange boy becomes, the more interesting this is going to get.
Click to expand...

Yeah - off the back of a guaranteed win for the Democrat Senatorial candidate.
 
Chris_the_Brit said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1270314498994458626

Trump is in deep trouble - women vote at a higher rate than men and making gains with the white working-class (Trump's base). Biden would also be better with the WWC - he has that folksy appeal that Hilary never had. Also leading with the ballies - always look at that 65+ demographic, they usually pick the winning side.

Current electoral map according to the views of Ladbrokes punters. Think they are being a too optimistic about NC, Trump won that clearly in 2016. I am keeping my eyes peeled on Iowa here, there could definitely be value there.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1270257444065869824
Click to expand...

NGL, after the absolute shetshow that was 2016's prediciton landscape, why would anyone give a flying fek about these polls.
 
Vorastra said:
NGL, after the absolute shetshow that was 2016's prediciton landscape, why would anyone give a flying fek about these polls.
Click to expand...

It wasn't the polling that was off.

news.harvard.edu

Nate Silver says conventional wisdom, not data, killed 2016 election forecasts

Don’t blame data analytics for Trump’s unexpected victory, Nate Silver says, blame political reporting’s conventional wisdom.
news.harvard.edu news.harvard.edu
fivethirtyeight.com

Politics News | Breaking Political News, Video & Analysis-ABC News

ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.
fivethirtyeight.com fivethirtyeight.com
fivethirtyeight.com

Politics News | Breaking Political News, Video & Analysis-ABC News

ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.
fivethirtyeight.com fivethirtyeight.com
 
OrbitalDawn said:
It wasn't the polling that was off.

news.harvard.edu

Nate Silver says conventional wisdom, not data, killed 2016 election forecasts

Don’t blame data analytics for Trump’s unexpected victory, Nate Silver says, blame political reporting’s conventional wisdom.
news.harvard.edu news.harvard.edu
fivethirtyeight.com

Politics News | Breaking Political News, Video & Analysis-ABC News

ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.
fivethirtyeight.com fivethirtyeight.com
fivethirtyeight.com

Politics News | Breaking Political News, Video & Analysis-ABC News

ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.
fivethirtyeight.com fivethirtyeight.com
Click to expand...
So basically "we were totes correct guys".
I know what I saw on CNN and the other news channels. Every one of them showed multiple polls of Clinton beating Trump.

They mustn't come with their excuses after.
Because that's what it looks like. Excuses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X