greg0205
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 28,863
SCOTUS battles ahead. Kennedy's leaving, so another pick for Trump.
If a nomination gets through before November, by Christmas next year abortion will be illegal in 25 of the 50 states.
SCOTUS battles ahead. Kennedy's leaving, so another pick for Trump.
Kansas did the exact same thing literally a few years ago, and only last year finally ended their idiotic idea.
And it was a dismal failure, as expected.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that the Senate will vote in the fall to confirm President Trump's forthcoming nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.
"The Senate stands ready to fulfill its constitutional role by offering advice and consent … We will vote to confirm Justice Kennedy’s successor this fall," McConnell said from the Senate floor.
McConnell laid down early guidelines for consideration of the forthcoming nomination, saying while senators would be able to meet with the nominee, he expected Trump's pick to be treated "fairly."
They're ****ed. Even if Flake goes against the Republicans, McConnell will weasel out a rule to take them to majority.
And if RBG and Bayer go down any time soon, that's it.
Milo Yiannopoulos:
“I can’t wait for the vigilante squads to start gunning journalists down on sight,”
Hopefully Trump will select a non-white transgendered sodomite that married her sister and supports killing unborn humans...just to make the snowflakes sleep again.SCOTUS battles ahead. Kennedy's leaving, so another pick for Trump.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...kansas-budget-impasse-look-beyond-the-hype-toYup Kansas/California is a good recent example of two states choosing two opposite methods whilst having the opposite success. Whilst im not a proponent of simply raising taxes on the rich (there is a time and place for raising or lowering taxes on the rich, usually when there is a buget surplus), the idea of trickle down is bunk.
What is trickle down economics? Looks like you and the libtards fall for the same lie:http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...kansas-budget-impasse-look-beyond-the-hype-to
Here's a sensible, factual article on Kansas economics for those that actually care and aren't just trying to score some political points. Surprise-suprise the tickle- down worked as advertised.
A usefull strawman bogeyman from leftards so they can support their own creeping up poverty socialist economic plans.If there is ever a contest for the biggest lie in politics, this one should be a top contender.
While there have been all too many lies told in politics, most have some little tiny fraction of truth in them, to make them seem plausible. But the "trickle-down" lie is 100 percent lie.
It should win the contest both because of its purity -- no contaminating speck of truth -- and because of how many people have repeated it over the years, without any evidence being asked for or given.
Years ago, this column challenged anybody to quote any economist outside of an insane asylum who had ever advocated this "trickle-down" theory. Some readers said that somebody said that somebody else had advocated a "trickle-down" policy. But they could never name that somebody else and quote them.
Mayor de Blasio is by no means the first politician to denounce this non-existent theory. Back in 2008, presidential candidate Barack Obama attacked what he called "an economic philosophy" which "says we should give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else."
Let's do something completely unexpected: Let's stop and think. Why would anyone advocate that we "give" something to A in hopes that it would trickle down to B? Why in the world would any sane person not give it to B and cut out the middleman? But all this is moot, because there was no trickle-down theory about giving something to anybody in the first place.
The "trickle-down" theory cannot be found in even the most voluminous scholarly studies of economic theories -- including J.A. Schumpeter's monumental "History of Economic Analysis," more than a thousand pages long and printed in very small type.
What is trickle down economics? Looks like you and the libtards fall for the
Years ago, this column challenged anybody to quote any economist outside of an insane asylum who had ever advocated this "trickle-down" theory.
A usefull strawman bogeyman from leftards so they can support their own creeping up poverty socialist economic plans.
Glad you spotted it as intended. Now all we need is a bit of integrity and apply the same logic to trickle down BS.Its just another term for supply side economics, are we going to pretend that doesnt exist either?
Sounds like this admin.
Now thats what you call a strawman.
Keep dreaming, it requires an ability to see reality.I dream of a day when Techne posts something that isn't a ludicrously poor troll/deflection attempt.
Hopefully Trump will select a non-white transgendered sodomite that married her sister and supports killing unborn humans...just to make the snowflakes sleep again.
Michelle...I don't think Obama is legally qualified though ...
Glad you spotted it as intended. Now all we need is a bit of integrity and apply the same logic to trickle down BS.