US politics general thread

[Seriously]

Because everyone who tries to avoid answering a simple question by resorting to cheap insults and block capitals is most likely a troll.

What was the question again?

When will you answer this question?

Still waiting for you to explain how you got to the fact that pitbull said that Democrats or rather more specific "(that liberals don't become soldiers)"

 

[Cray]

Not going anywhere. Just find it curious that you have nothing to add apart from likes. I figured you might have a free mind and all that. I guess the NPC correlation seems to be true. Back to whatever it is you're doing. Like I said, was just curious.

To be fair I don't follow US politics as much as most on this thread so I will try to read a lot of what is posted but don't feel qualified to make pronouncements on the minutia of US politics, occasionally a topic of interest will crop up and my input will increase but I would rather follow what others have to say on specific topics than simply put in random opinions If you want to call me an NPC then go right ahead, it's always much easier to characterize those on the other side as mindless than actually take the time to engage honestly with them..

 

[Seriously]

Not going anywhere. Just find it curious that you have nothing to add apart from likes. I figured you might have a free mind and all that. I guess the NPC correlation seems to be true. Back to whatever it is you're doing. Like I said, was just curious.

This one?

 

[Cray]

Still waiting for you to explain how you got to the fact that pitbull said that Democrats or rather more specific "(that liberals don't become soldiers)"

Still waiting for you to quote the "facts" in Pitbull's post, the ones that referenced in response to Obronie's post

"LOL, the kind of retorts a typical libtard come up with to counter facts are really comical at bes "

 

[Seriously]

To be fair I don't follow US politics as much as most on this thread so I will try to read a lot of what is posted but don't feel qualified to make pronouncements on the minutia of US politics, occasionally a topic of interest will crop up and my input will increase but I would rather follow what others have to say on specific topics than simply put in random opinions If you want to call me an NPC then go right ahead, it's always much easier to characterize those on the other side as mindless than actually take the time to engage honestly with them..

LOL. That makes you a troll in this thread not?

 

[Cray]

This one?

@ Rietrot - continually posting this pic is also what makes him a troll.

 

[Seriously]

Still waiting for you to quote the "facts" in Pitbull's post, the ones that referenced in response to Obronie's post

"LOL, the kind of retorts a typical libtard come up with to counter facts are really comical at bes "

I think our definitions of WAR is different. That being said, luckily those joining the army are not raised by Libtards, else they would not have joined the army am I right? Glad some folks still know how to raise their kids the right way.

This fact!

 

[Seriously]

@ Rietrot - continually posting this pic is also what makes him a troll.

Dont be sad and feel neglected for it. I will also create one specifically for you.

 

[Cray]

This fact!

Citation needed.

 

[Cray]

Dont be sad and feel neglected for it. I will also create one specifically for you.

Whatever floats your boat.

 

[Seriously]

Citation needed.

Another copout response? You need an explanation for that? Oh ya..now I remember..You said
"To be fair I don't follow US politics as much as most on this thread so I will try to read a lot of what is posted but don't feel qualified to make pronouncements on the minutia of US politics, "

So now I understand your narrative.

 

[Aquila ka Hecate]

@ Rietrot - continually posting this pic is also what makes him a troll.

A lazy one at that.

 

[cerebus]

luckily those joining the army are not raised by Libtards

This fact!

You have a major problem differentiating fact from opinion.

 

[Nick333]

That's not what I said.

I said that people who tend to demonise Soros are not particularly bright.
They were born that way I'm afraid.

It's not particularly hard to demonize Soros admittedly, but that's because he's an objectively bad person.

 

[Nick333]

Lots of capitalists manipulate markets if they have enough capital to get away with it... What illegal trade practices did he engage in?

He was convicted of insider trading in 2002 - he's a known criminal. You'd think you'd know some stuff about someone you're defending.

 

[Aquila ka Hecate]

It's not particularly hard to demonize Soros admittedly, but that's because he's an objectively bad person.

Is he?

I'll admit to complete ignorance as far as Soros is concerned.
I saw a photo of him in that NYT article and was quite surprised at his lack of hooves and a tail.
But they say the Devil looks suspiciously normal, don't they?

 

[Cray]

He was convicted of insider trading in 2002 - he's a known criminal. You'd think you'd know some stuff about someone you're defending.

Have never defended him, honestly don know enough about him apart that he seems like the literal devil to conservative types. I find it amusing that the right goes on about Trump derangement syndrome yet engage in similar rants about Soros.

 

[Cray]

Another copout response? You need an explanation for that? Oh ya..now I remember..You said

No, I need evidence of that "fact", it's really not difficult.

"To be fair I don't follow US politics as much as most on this thread so I will try to read a lot of what is posted but don't feel qualified to make pronouncements on the minutia of US politics, "

How is asking for evidence in any way related to the above?

 

[Nick333]

Have never defended him, honestly don know enough about him apart that he seems like the literal devil to conservative types. I find it amusing that the right goes on about Trump derangement syndrome yet engage in similar rants about Soros.

So, you don't anything about him you assume the conservative opinion of him is deranged?

 

[Pitbull]

No, I need evidence of that "fact", it's really not difficult.

:erm:

He's not claiming my statement is fact. He's claiming your comprehension of it is wrong and used my post as factual proof of what I have typed.

You are aware of that right?