US politics general thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
greg0205 said:
Quick note here: Whether the can or can’t detonate, it’s an act of terrorism. Simple as that.
Click to expand...

Not disputing that at all.

I'm disputing that it's republicans or even the right. As if they can go through all the trouble to make the bombs and they hate these liberals so much. Why would not even 1 detonate or kill a target? It makes zero sense.
 
Pitbull said:
Which is fair.

My leaning on this however would be: Why create 8 (or more) bombs, send them around the country and not having any one of them exploding or endangering any lives. I mean if it's bombs right... It doesn't fit.
Click to expand...

There will be more. Nancy Pelosi hasn’t got her mail bomb yet.
 
Xarog said:
No no, you just need to let the Dems win. Then they can be civil.:sneaky:
Click to expand...
You sure of that? Anyway, "them" maybe' (the real Dems) but not those rag tag "supporter's" base they call to arms, representing the majority of the lower class Americans, or NPC's, made up of illegal and legal imigrants, criminals, #metoo shouters, Soros funded groups and NGO's, etc, etc....to many to list.
Definitely desperate Dems.
 
Pitbull said:
*IF* Hillary was President. You need to compare apples with apples. Trump is President. He endorsed someone because of their political affiliation. So I now needs to completely move away from that political party because Trump endorsed a Republican who body slammed a journalist?

It's pretty simple. And you know full well your answer would be no. Why should mine be different that yours?
Click to expand...

If any President had said something like that, it would need to be condemned by everyone who values the right to a free press. It has nothing to do with partisan affiliations and it's cowardly to hide behind those. It still wouldn't 'make' me a Republican, why should it? The fact that you have nothing negative to say about Trump's endorsement of Gianforte says a lot about your own proclivities.
 
cerebus said:
If any President had said something like that, it would need to be condemned by everyone who values the right to a free press. It has nothing to do with partisan affiliations and it's cowardly to hide behind those. It still wouldn't 'make' me a Republican, why should it? The fact that you have nothing negative to say about Trump's endorsement of Gianforte says a lot about your own proclivities.
Click to expand...

So "FEELS" ?

Sorry I don't do feels. I do policies and views.
 
cerebus said:
If any President had said something like that, it would need to be condemned by everyone who values the right to a free press. It has nothing to do with partisan affiliations and it's cowardly to hide behind those. It still wouldn't 'make' me a Republican, why should it? The fact that you have nothing negative to say about Trump's endorsement of Gianforte says a lot about your own proclivities.
Click to expand...

Again, I can't be arsed if Donald has anal intercourse with 500 male prostitutes and claims never to had any sexual relations with them... I don't give a fark. How you haven't realized that much in almost 400 pages is beyond me.

I support Trump for his policies, and views. Simple as that. You can nit pick issues you have with people's behaviour all you want. Don't drag me to your level.
 
Pitbull said:
Not disputing that at all.

I'm disputing that it's republicans or even the right. As if they can go through all the trouble to make the bombs and they hate these liberals so much. Why would not even 1 detonate or kill a target? It makes zero sense.
Click to expand...

Just spitballing here, but maybe ‘cos whoever is sending them is a dumbass?
You can keep your pick of a leftie dumbass, but I’m sticking with my dumbass on the right ‘till further notice.
 
greg0205 said:
There will be more. Nancy Pelosi hasn’t got her mail bomb yet.
Click to expand...

Not denying it. Probably 100 more. But I can bet you none of them will go off and kill it's target. But that's just me. One or two will probably go off and no fatalities. You know them Liberals can't have that :p
 
Pitbull said:
Again, I can't be arsed if Donald has anal intercourse with 500 male prostitutes and claims never to had any sexual relations with them... I don't give a fark. How you haven't realized that much in almost 400 pages is beyond me.

I support Trump for his policies, and views. Simple as that. You can nit pick issues you have with people's behaviour all you want. Don't drag me to your level.
Click to expand...

I also hate it when I say something stupid in response then think of a good comeback later. Here's the correct term for it: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=l'esprit de l'escalier

But I usually don't feel the need to requote the post.
 
greg0205 said:
Just spitballing here, but maybe ‘cos whoever is sending them is a dumbass?
You can keep your pick of a leftie dumbass, but I’m sticking with my dumbass on the right ‘till further notice.
Click to expand...

I'll be more than happy to admit being wrong. I have done so before. This person/s will be caught and the truth will come out. If it's a Liberal, the left is fark!
 
Pitbull said:
*IF* Hillary was President. You need to compare apples with apples. Trump is President. He endorsed someone because of their political affiliation. So I now needs to completely move away from that political party because Trump endorsed a Republican who body slammed a journalist?
Click to expand...
If Hillary was president it actually makes it worse and I would no longer support her for re-election, I might still support her party if they withdrew their support for her.
 
Seriously said:
You sure of that? Anyway, "them" maybe' (the real Dems) but not those rag tag "supporter's" base they call to arms, representing the majority of the lower class Americans, or NPC's, made up of illegal and legal imigrants, criminals, #metoo shouters, Soros funded groups and NGO's, etc, etc....to many to list.
Definitely desperate Dems.
Click to expand...
Lol, my post was definitely tongue in cheek.
 
Pitbull said:
Again, I can't be arsed if Donald has anal intercourse with 500 male prostitutes and claims never to had any sexual relations with them... I don't give a fark. How you haven't realized that much in almost 400 pages is beyond me.

I support Trump for his policies, and views. Simple as that. You can nit pick issues you have with people's behaviour all you want. Don't drag me to your level.
Click to expand...
Have you noticed how pissed the lefties are that we won't play their game?
 
Cray said:
If Hillary was president it actually makes it worse and I would no longer support her for re-election, I might still support her party if they withdrew their support for her.
Click to expand...
So given the video I posted of her saying that there's only a cause to be civil after the Dems are in power and given your lack of comdemnation, what should we infer given what you have just said? :unsure:
 
Xarog said:
So given the video I posted of her saying that there's only a cause to be civil after the Dems are in power and given your lack of comdemnation, what should we infer given what you have just said? :unsure:
Click to expand...
Is being uncivil against the law? (haven't watched your video, at work and my earphone jack on my laptop is broken).
 
Cray said:
Is being uncivil against the law? (haven't watched your video, at work and my earphone jack on my laptop is broken).
Click to expand...
Yes, typically being uncivil in the political realm entails civil disobedience, which would be against the law. I mean, what's worse, saying that someone should bodyslam journalists, or suggesting that people engage "uncivilly"? I don't really see the difference, personally. :confused:

And it certainly makes a mockery of Hillary's BS about unity after these bombs came out. :ROFL:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X