Sorry, I know conservatard comprehension is bad, but you might want to have a look at who brought up the NHI or that Guardian article.Hmm?
Hint: it wasn't Cray or me.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Sorry, I know conservatard comprehension is bad, but you might want to have a look at who brought up the NHI or that Guardian article.Hmm?
If they are outside the risk of transmission is absolutely miniscule. UV light from the sun and the simple dilution effect of fresh air drops the probability of infection dramatically. All that happened by restricting people to the pavements is everyone ended up being even closer together because a 3m wide pavement is much smaller than a 50m wide beach.I'm pretty sure plenty of decisions regarding movement etc were an overreaction to unknowns at the time butI'm sure people generally don't congregate on pavements as they would on the sand? Also, less people on the pavement if the beach itself wasn't an attraction? Avoiding large amounts of people mingling was pointless to you?
What part of overreaction to unknowns is confusing to you?And the short sleeve t-shirts? Open toe shoes?
And cooked chicken none the less. The science says that buying cooked chicken from Woolworths is far more dangerous and increases the risk of catching covid than buying a raw chicken.And the short sleeve t-shirts? Open toe shoes?
Because you are defending it. There should have never been an overreaction by "experts" if they knew what they were doing.What part of overreaction to unknowns is confusing to you?
Hindsight is 20/20. Are you forgetting how countries were spraying their streets with chemicals etc?If they are outside the risk of transmission is absolutely miniscule.
UV light from the sun? Come now, the intensity of UV sterilisers are far more intense in the medical field or even fishponds than the sun. The point you're missing is people shouldn't be congregating.UV light from the sun and the simple dilution effect of fresh air drops the probability of infection dramatically. All that happened by restricting people to the pavements is everyone ended up being even closer together because a 3m wide pavement is much smaller than a 50m wide beach.
It is well known that people wear short sleeve shirts when they are hot. Ie, they have a temperature. Ie. they have the rona. Due to this increased temperature, they are also more than likely to wear open toed shoes to get rid of the excess heat(and yes, standing in water in their open toed shoes, like the ocean. Cutting off the supply of these items resulted in people with the rona staying at home.And the short sleeve t-shirts? Open toe shoes?
Sure guy. I'm defending something I said was probably an overreaction. Being overly cautious is not a bad approach. I think you're rather optimistic to think that the world consists of experts that know everything about new viruses.Because you are defending it. There should have never been an overreaction by "experts" if they knew what they were doing.
Nah, they learnt the sun has a corona ...It is well known that people wear short sleeve shirts when they are hot. Ie, they have a temperature. Ie. they have the rona. Due to this increased temperature, they are also more than likely to wear open toed shoes to get rid of the excess heat(and yes, standing in water in their open toed shoes, like the ocean. Cutting off the supply of these items resulted in people with the rona staying at home.
![]()
Overreaction based upon scientific fact, perhaps. Hysteria is something totally different.What part of overreaction to unknowns is confusing to you?
All this was known well before the coof.Hindsight is 20/20. Are you forgetting how countries were spraying their streets with chemicals etc?
Dosage is also dependant on time exposure. Which would happen continuously to any aerosol particle outside:UV light from the sun? Come now, the intensity of UV sterilisers are far more intense in the medical field or even fishponds than the sun.
Aerosols represent a potential transmission route of COVID-19. This study examined effect of simulated sunlight, relative humidity, and suspension matrix on stability of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols. Simulated sunlight and matrix significantly affected decay rate of the virus. Relative humidity alone did not affect the decay rate; however, minor interactions between relative humidity and other factors were observed. Mean decay rates (± SD) in simulated saliva, under simulated sunlight levels representative of late winter/early fall and summer were 0.121 ± 0.017 min-1 (90% loss, 19 minutes) and 0.306 ± 0.097 min-1 (90% loss, 8 minutes), respectively. Mean decay rate without simulated sunlight across all relative humidity levels was 0.008 ± 0.011 min-1 (90% loss, 286 minutes). These results suggest that the potential for aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 may be dependent on environmental conditions, particularly sunlight. These data may be useful to inform mitigation strategies to minimize the potential for aerosol transmission.
Except in:The point you're missing is people shouldn't be congregating.
Jissus, you just proved again peanut butter is not a good substitute for brains.Sorry, I know conservatard comprehension is bad, but you might want to have a look at who brought up the NHI or that Guardian article.
Hint: it wasn't Cray or me.
Context matters.Interesting... millions of people around the world, some still living, many dead, disagree... eg.
Sure everyone knew everything and everything was certain and that's why there was so much disagreement because everything was certain.All this was known well before the coof.
UVC doesn't penetrate the atmosphere. You're talking about something completely different and conflating quite a bit.Dosage is also dependant on time exposure. Which would happen continuously to any aerosol particle outside:
Youre not considering non-aerosol transfer.Add that to the dilution effect and you basically don't get the issue.
Not those either.Except in:
Shops
Restaurants
BLM protests
So basically unless it's an insurrection attempt, you should just disregard election laws entirely?Didn't see either of them incite an insurrection but of course that's just 1776 to Conservatards
There's that comprehension failure for conservatards againSo basically unless it's an insurrection attempt, you should just disregard election laws entirely?![]()
Overreaction based on the unknowns.Overreaction based upon scientific fact, perhaps. Hysteria is something totally different.
I'm old enough to remember when they declared funerals, church gatherings and trump campaigns mass spreader events while in the same breathe declaring blm protests safeAll this was known well before the coof.
Dosage is also dependant on time exposure. Which would happen continuously to any aerosol particle outside:
![]()
Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Is Rapidly Inactivated by Simulated Sunlight - PubMed
Aerosols represent a potential transmission route of COVID-19. This study examined effect of simulated sunlight, relative humidity, and suspension matrix on stability of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols. Simulated sunlight and matrix significantly affected decay rate of the virus. Relative humidity alone...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Add that to the dilution effect and you basically don't get the issue.
Except in:
Shops
Restaurants
BLM protests
There's that comprehension failure for conservatards again![]()
Yeah, I don't think so. Looks more like it's time for the libtards to start loving Putler.Putin challenger Boris Nadezhdin barred from Russia's election
No wonder Conservatards love Putin.
I'm pretty sure any protest action by anyone in close proximity would've resulted in some transfer. The difference here is noone is going to go "Hey doc, I was protesting/rioting and that's where I got it" whereas they are more likely to admit to it if hey, I attended that funeral and a bunch of people who also attended that funeral also got covid.I'm old enough to remember when they declared funerals, church gatherings and trump campaigns mass spreader events while in the same breathe declaring blm protests safe![]()
Usual lot displaying their standardsYeah, I don't think so. Looks more like it's time for the libtards to start loving Putler.