Hi Guys
Just want to get the forums thoughts on this matter.... I dunno if i'm being unreasonable or just expecting too much, or maybe just plain crazy...
If you had bought a $350 card and had it fail after 2yrs, now the supplier turns around and says to you, because the ZAR has collapsed, we are only willing to replace it with a card that has somewhat similar specs but is only priced at $200.... do you guys also think that is rubbish or do you think its quite acceptable, to replace what still is a pretty decent card with something that is now considered rather on the low end of the spectrum barely considered a gaming card...
mind you to prove the point even further.... while $350 cost me R4k in 2012, $330 nowadays is costing us R6k I mus pay in another R2k just to get a card at the same price point/performance category as the card that failed...
Just want to get the forums thoughts on this matter.... I dunno if i'm being unreasonable or just expecting too much, or maybe just plain crazy...
If you had bought a $350 card and had it fail after 2yrs, now the supplier turns around and says to you, because the ZAR has collapsed, we are only willing to replace it with a card that has somewhat similar specs but is only priced at $200.... do you guys also think that is rubbish or do you think its quite acceptable, to replace what still is a pretty decent card with something that is now considered rather on the low end of the spectrum barely considered a gaming card...
mind you to prove the point even further.... while $350 cost me R4k in 2012, $330 nowadays is costing us R6k I mus pay in another R2k just to get a card at the same price point/performance category as the card that failed...