Vista and Windows 7

Soul Assassin

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
11,758
Reaction score
2,330
Maybe we can start by sharing our WEI (Windows Experience Score) for Vista and Win 7.

2zf8x3p.jpg


Everything gets 5.9 except for my cpu, Core 2 Duo E8400.

Will post my Win 7 score by tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Vista 64 bit
Everything gets 5.9 except cpu which gets 5.0 (AMD x2 4600+ )

Windows 7 64 bit
http://i39.tinypic.com/669rhf.jpg

Specs
CPU: AMD x2 4600+
RAM: Corsair 2gig DDR2 800
G card: XFX 8800gt XT
Vista HDD: Seagate 250 gig SATA
Windows 7 HDD: Seagate 160 gig IDE
 
Vista 32-bit:
Will still post...

Windows 7 64-bit:
Processor: 5.9
RAM: 5.5
Graphics: 7.9
Gaming Graphics: 5.9
HDD: 3.0 (WHY?)

SPECS:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 2.81GHz @ 3.07GHz
2x 1GB Kingston ValueRAM 800MHz
Graphics Card: Inno3D 9800GTX+
HDD: 250GB Seagate Barracuda SATA (Vista & Win 7 are on separate partitions)
 
Vista 32-bit:
Will still post...

Windows 7 64-bit:
Processor: 5.9
RAM: 5.5
Graphics: 7.9
Gaming Graphics: 5.9
HDD: 3.0 (WHY?)

SPECS:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 2.81GHz @ 3.07GHz
2x 1GB Kingston ValueRAM 800MHz
Graphics Card: Inno3D 9800GTX+
HDD: 250GB Seagate Barracuda SATA (Vista & Win 7 are on separate partitions)

Apparently your bad HDD score is due to bad SATA drivers. Try and find the proper Vista 64 bit ones for your mobo.
 
Apparently your bad HDD score is due to bad SATA drivers. Try and find the proper Vista 64 bit ones for your mobo.

Thanks dude! I'll try that. I didn't bother to install new drivers cos everything worked so seamlessly but I'll do that. :)
 
Maybe we can start by sharing our WEI (Windows Experience Score) for Vista and Win 7.

2zf8x3p.jpg


Everything gets 5.9 except for my cpu, Core 2 Duo E8400.

Will post my Win 7 score by tomorrow.

Did you OC your E8400, cause I only get 5.8 when I OC it to 3.6Ghz. Everything else gets 5.9 as well in Vista 64bit. Haven't loaded Windows 7 on this pc yet.
 
Vista 32-bit:
Will still post...

Windows 7 64-bit:
Processor: 5.9
RAM: 5.5
Graphics: 7.9
Gaming Graphics: 5.9
HDD: 3.0 (WHY?)

SPECS:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 2.81GHz @ 3.07GHz
2x 1GB Kingston ValueRAM 800MHz
Graphics Card: Inno3D 9800GTX+
HDD: 250GB Seagate Barracuda SATA (Vista & Win 7 are on separate partitions)

Shouldn't your Gaming Graphics be higher? my 8800gt got 6.0 on standard clocks
 
Shouldn't your Gaming Graphics be higher? my 8800gt got 6.0 on standard clocks

I also noticed that. It's still buggy. Hehe. :D
Don't get your hopes up. Plus, I think it might rise if I OC but I only got the card on Tuesday so I don't wanna bugger it up so quickly. I'll wait a year or so 'til the warranty is up.
 
Apparently your bad HDD score is due to bad SATA drivers. Try and find the proper Vista 64 bit ones for your mobo.

Doesn't work for me. I am using the latest chipset drivers for my mobo. Which under vista gets a h/d score of 5.7 but using the same drivers under win 7 64 bit it gets a 3. There seems to be an issue with the scoring system and seagate drives.
 
Doesn't work for me. I am using the latest chipset drivers for my mobo. Which under vista gets a h/d score of 5.7 but using the same drivers under win 7 64 bit it gets a 3. There seems to be an issue with the scoring system and seagate drives.

Seems so. I also tried it to no avail. Well, it's Beta 1 and more stable than Vista RTM tbh.
 
Why for the love of God cant Microsoft just use something out of 10 to score something instead of these weird values?
 
Why for the love of God cant Microsoft just use something out of 10 to score something instead of these weird values?

Dude, it makes no difference what they use. It's understandable either way. And please, even impatience does not constitute blasphemy.
 
Why for the love of God cant Microsoft just use something out of 10 to score something instead of these weird values?
For one very simple reason: the top line will increase over time to allow for newer higher performance hardware. Vista has a 5.9 scale, and the W7Beta has a 7.9 scale. You can expect the scale to be higher when new generation hardware comes out. That way, older systems will always keep their score (unless hardware is upgraded), ie a Windows Experience Index of say 3.5 will always stay at 3.5, so over time there's a real measure of relative performance over hardware and Windows generations.

If they always had an out-of-10 scale, then everything goes wonky over time and all relative performance meaures disappear because the same hardware will have a different index depending on the version of Windows it runs.

Think about it: what would a "maximum" say 10/10 performance index mean to anyone? There's no such thing and no such system -- it means zip. The MS method of an upward sliding lid actually makes the best sense.

Microsoft actually thought this through quite carefully.
 
Last edited:
For one very simple reason: the top line will increase over time to allow for newer higher performance hardware. Vista has a 5.9 scale, and the W7Beta has a 7.9 scale. You can expect the scale to be higher when new generation hardware comes out. That way, older systems will always keep their score (unless hardware is upgraded), ie a Windows Experience Index of say 3.5 will always stay at 3.5, so over time there's a real measure of relative performance over hardware and Windows generations.

If they always had an out-of-10 scale, then everything goes wonky over time and all relative performance meaures disappear because the same hardware will have a different index depending on the version of Windows it runs.

Think about it: what would a "maximum" say 10/10 performance index mean to anyone? There's no such thing and no such system -- it means zip. The MS method of an upward sliding lid actually makes the best sense.

Microsoft actually thought this through quite carefully.

+1
 
Now it makes sense. Never thought of it that way. ty Arthur. :D

Edit: Today's 10/10 pc won't be tomorrow's 10/10 pc...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X