Grant
Honorary Master
Did these ever get to our shores ?
I am thinking the 4.0L or 6.0L must have been rather fierce !
I am thinking the 4.0L or 6.0L must have been rather fierce !
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Not really. e.g. The Veyron was essentially designed by the VW group - that backing certainly didn't come from Audi. Its mostly a branding thing - though naturally a car costing 2x as much is likely to be of higher quality regardless of branding & the legal name under which its manufactured.The problem with a luxury VW is...Audi.
Not really. e.g. The Veyron was essentially designed by the VW group - that backing certainly didn't come from Audi. Its mostly a branding thing - though naturally a car costing 2x as much is likely to be of higher quality regardless of branding & the legal name under which its manufactured.
That to me is one epic fail. I've got a potato here with a Nike logo on it - I'll sell it to you for a mere 2 grand.I mean branding.
That to me is one epic fail. I've got a potato here with a Nike logo on it - I'll sell it to you for a mere 2 grand.
See? Branding is only useful in so far as it helps identify quality in a convincing way. Well unless you're an idiot, then my potato plan might just work....
With ze German cars, you've got a +- reasonable expectation that actual results will be pretty close to what they sell you in the ad. Sure its not bullet proof, but if you drop half a bar on a bmw you can be pretty sure that things will be OK one way or the other. e.g. Hell I've seen BMW mechs denounce ownership of materials accidentally left in a customer's cars boot just because they decide its better to take the financial hit than cause a dispute.
Frankly my friend if you think luxury and quality are two distinct things in a car then you are entirely insane.You've completely missed my point. VW has a luxury brand, it's called Audi. From a marketing standpoint, making a luxury VW is silly. I'm not talking about the build quality or what factory it came out of.
It is not wrong. Price should, in a perfect world, be determined by quality. Marketing distorts this. What I'm trying to convey is that you should be judging true value vs Rand value cost. Luxury brand names (say uhm Audi) tend to inflate the Rand value side.Your potato theory is also wrong.
You've completely missed my point. VW has a luxury brand, it's called Audi. From a marketing standpoint, making a luxury VW is silly. I'm not talking about the build quality or what factory it came out of. I'm talking purely for the fact that VW means every day person car to me and Audi is the "premium VW" if you will. Putting a VW badge on a Bentley like car is like putting a Rolls Royce badge on a polo like car. Not need for philosophy here. Just simple marketing and branding. Your potato theory is also wrong. That VW is still extermemly expensive so it's no like you're getting a bargon.
Errrrm VW is a premium brand. Some would argue that the phaeton is a better car than any Audi at the time. It was designed to be a luxury VW for a select market. It was very highly ranked in the markets it was sold in.
The most Meh Vw I have ever seen in my life. Looks like a fat jetta and the jetta is no super model either.
That statement just betrays you as someone with, at best, but a passing interest in cars...