Wanted: Facebook racist

Should Facebook assist in revealing the identity of the Facebook poster?

  • Yes

    Votes: 53 38.7%
  • No

    Votes: 73 53.3%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 11 8.0%

  • Total voters
    137
I spared you the time. Please show me cause I sure as he'll did not mean it.
similar to the page that was opened during the elections by an and supporter with the kids playing.makes you wonder. http://southafrica-pig.blogspot.com/2011/05/anc-election-poster.html
They are the biggest racist orinasation in the country. Comparing them to the AWB is not out of line.

If this is true we might all just start liking Jacob's choice for chief justice. He likes the death penalty.

The account could have been hacked. I know that if the rooster could he would do this to me. How would you proof he posted the pic? I guess you could get his account activity. But it still does not mean it was him
( playing devils advocate here) I know how difficult it is to proof charges of fraud in our company just by knowing that if you can not proof the person who logged in. Not everybody is secretive about these things.

Jip the difference is only the volume of idiots. If the remaining members of the AWB were not racists after say 1999 they would have changed their name. if you are a member the AWB you can just as well tattoo idiot on your face. Whether they are dangerous is another question. You need large volumes of idiots to be dangerous and 500 odd members are just silly.

So it's not possible at all? Not at all?

so malema's fake pages were not fake? I read 9 pages. I took what everybody said into consideration. Everybody in this country is innocent till proven guilty. As I have learned the hard way with our media. I'm not sending people on a witch hunt after someone that has not even been pro fen to be a real person( as in fake profile)
Oh looky I posted two posts and you called me a racist. No surprise there. Again nothing intelligent to add.

And why would you doubt whites to be racist? It's in the news everyday. Remember it is blacks that can not be. ( remember I posted you the link. Ooh yeah and remember someone from MBB had an interview on special assignment where the topic was this, and they found that indeed blacks can not be racist.)
 
If anyone is a racist it's Fudzy, blind till the very end.

Please elaborate, how am I a racist? If not liking, actually despising people who feel they are superior to someone else based merits that are literally only skin deep then fine, I'm a racist. I'm pretty sure that's not it's standard definition but you are entitled to your own delusions.
 
and we know from previous instaces like the link I posted and the village idiots fake pages how easy it is to stir racial tension with this.

Like I said in my first post that I think R13 missed. If this Is true we might all start to like Jacobs idea for the next chief of justice.

I did not even want to go to his page. So I would not know. But yes. I hope he gets what is coming.

So agreeing with you made you a friend as well? Where was I defensive? With R13? He is a troll.

Yes, the elections though were a clear and understandable motive for those posters. (There was one with the white kids riding the black kids on a ANC poster IIRC) The problem is that this chap didn't just start a profile, post the pic and get 580 odd friends over night. If this was the work of the ANCYL trying to cause **** we should all be in awe of their incredible smear campaign capabilities. It's just highly, HIGHLY unlikely.
the pic was poste last year in June. The friends did not pop up over night.
And it seems like it has been in the news before.
 
My post /\ about the time line is not in his favour, just pointing out.

You missed the I made about you proving my point. I made mention in the post before yours that it's disturbing that people try and justify/deflect the content of the photo by bringing up farm murders/Julius Malema. There shouldn't be any excuses.

In any case, what would your feelings be if the photo depicted what I described earlier? Would you consider it to be real until proven otherwise or vice versa?
 
You missed the I made about you proving my point. I made mention in the post before yours that it's disturbing that people try and justify/deflect the content of the photo by bringing up farm murders/Julius Malema. There shouldn't be any excuses.

In any case, what would your feelings be if the photo depicted what I described earlier? Would you consider it to be real until proven otherwise or vice versa?
I did probably miss the point you were trying to make, I did not however once try to justify the photo with farm murders or gemnocide.

With our media yes, seems like when I form an opinion about something on the first article they print I always have to retract my words a few days later, yes I have in the past shot my mouth of and had to come and appologise, so I decided to always doubt the media first then hear out more stories then have an opinion.

And with this I would like to state I do not agee with the information bill, but I do advocate hars sentences for journalists that print crap.

( please I'm not saying this is true ) imagine this guy is totally innocent. He gets torched tonight and then it comes out it was it all was a hoax or a lie.

That was just what I was trying to say. in the same breath I also said that if it is true we might see this idiot in an electric chair for it.
 
Last edited:
and marine1 one of kurt daren's :eek:
Bwahahaah I would rather support Malema
Lol, for God sake, how many more times do I need to say it. (Going to put it in a big font and bold for future reference)

I DON'T SUPPORT MALEMA AND I THINK HE'S A TWAT.

Exactly but yet its so easy for you to insult others and claim they support this racist pig?
 
As someone who has many years of trawling all corners of the 'net, I can confidently say I've seen some things most people couldn't begin to imagine - across all subjects.

To sit and flap one's feathers over this image does makes you look a fool, in my opinion.

Yes, it's not 'right', but it also hasn't been proven to be a fake.

What if it was a black man and a white child? Can you >honestly< tell me the response would be the same?

This country is populated by overly-sensitive race-obsessed political hypochondriacs.

Lastly, to say that this sort of thing gives malema ammunition really gets my goat. Why are [general] you pandering to a racist's games when you have no chance of winning with his rules? Extremists have always existed - and they always will - but the reason you're seeing more aggression and more overt displays such as this are because of the political front we're being presented with. If the ruling party had not instituted a tactic of vicious racist propaganda over the last couple of years, do you think people such as this "Eugene" would be surfacing so readily?

If someone bullies you, you will [eventually] retalitate, whether it be through physical violence, mental depression or some other route.

I highly doubt it.

Right or wrong, I can clearly see and understand why material like this is coming about.
 
http://mybroadband.co.za/news/internet/32690-facebook-hunter-paid-child-to-pose-beeld.html
The rightwing “hunter” in a Facebook picture paid a black child to pose as his “trophy” — but the photograph was old news, Beeld reported on Monday.

Hawks spokesman McIntosh Polela said this was what the man, who calls himself Eugene Terrorblance on his Facebook page, had told the police during an investigation in 2007.

“The man in the picture told the police he had paid the child to pose. The question is, why has the picture re-appeared on Facebook because it is in bad taste,” Polela told the Afrikaans daily.

“The police will investigate who published it on Facebook.”

Beeld said it was an old story, which the newspaper reported on in 2008.

At the time, it was established that the rightwing Facebook group which published the picture had been started by students of North West University in Potchefstroom.

The picture features a young white man posing with a rifle over a black child lying on the ground.

At one stage, the group had 10,616 members, but its membership started dropping dramatically when it received negative media coverage.

The university took disciplinary steps against seven students who belonged to the Facebook group.

One was suspended but charges against the remaining six were eventually dropped for a lack of evidence.

The picture re-appeared last June, this time on Terrorblance’s Facebook profile.
 
it's on google cache, it is a really sickening photo, if the child was injured or forced in any way (universal wrong) or because of this, we should probably make his name public

It is all public and was staged - this moron was investigated 4 years ago about this photo - it is not news, its just the Sunday Times desperate for sales.
 
Why were the students charged? Unless the Page was linked to the university or the students were in contravention of some or other specific clause in an AUP, I think that's ridiculous.

What >exactly< are the police going to investigate? ***** this country's minimal allotment of brain cells are routinely wasted on the biggest load of garbage.
 
I think SA is a crime free country, we have too much resources to investigate such boring instance.

What is the crime? I want to ask.
You may say he is bad taste, ring wing, racist ……. etc. but what is the crime?

Oooops I forgot SA does not have freedom of expression (crimina injuria) :p
 
Well there would be crime if it was possible to prove intent to do harm one way or another - inciting hate based action would surely constitute a crime. What if he confessed to someone that he intended to stir up a rebellion of sorts?

Of course I'm sure it's not the case here, but ja, still in poor taste of the worst kind given our situation. Having said all of that, I think the biggest potential to stir up hatred is the Sunday Times's print publishing of the article since it will be circulated where the impression will be the greatest unlike FB.
 
Last edited:
I voted no, and here's why. Anyone who believes the child in that photo is dead is a moron. The photo is in incredibly poor taste but poor taste is not a crime in this country. Some might argue that it's a form of hate speech but it's hardly and incitement to murder black children or children in general so, ja actually, it's just an expression of racism and poor taste. Anger at the photo is perfectly understandable but the witch hunt that has already ensued is proof that the powers that be are incapable of a rational response. I certainly don't want websites I've entrusted with my personal information sharing that information with agencies and people with the power to mess with my life but without the maturity and constraint to know when it's appropriate to do so.

Wise!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X