South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Im also not 100% sure. But in general terms Ive learned to trust RMS or nominal power.
"max watt" is a load of BS as a speaker can peak at xxxxxW for a split second, not even long enough for you to hear it. On the other hand If A speaker deliveres 200W RMS/nominal power you know that this power is constant.
You will also notice that alot of low budget speakers/amps tend to rather focus on "max power" ect. Some dont even mention RMS.
My Logitech Z5500 only has 500W RMS. That doesnt sound like much if you think that is includes 5 speakers, AND a sub. Trust me, 500W RMS is alot.
First, what the abbreviations mean:
PMPO: Peak Music Power Output (Or similar abbreviations). This is basically a useless measure for reasons that will be clear soon.
RMS: Root Mean Square. The root of the mean of the square. Taking some sinusoidal signal, you take the square root of the integral over one period of the signal SQUARED divided by one period. It refers to the measurement method used for determining voltage or current. This is NOT to be used for power.
Power = P = iv = i^2R = (V^2)/R
When you encounter products that quote power specifications, you will generally (in this country) see them quote both Watts PMPO and Watts RMS. PMPO is meaningless, as detailed HERE. What matters is the AVERAGE POWER rating, as determined by measuring RMS VOLTAGE, which is often (mistakenly) abbreviated "RMS POWER". The mistaken term doesn't mean that the term is meaningless. On the contrary, it says how much power the speakers (or amplifier or ANY equipment) will be able to sustain, whereas PMPO usually refers to what the equipment will be able to produce over a differential time.
There is NO correlation between PMPO (as used today) and RMS. This is because
1) PMPO measures a power (albeit a fictional rating) while RMS does NOT refer to power
2) PMPO today is not as it once was (a valid but still not meaningful quantity)
Concerning speakers, another important quantity to note is the impedance, which is where this discussion really comes into its own.
Some background:
Ohm's Law is usually quoted as V = iR meaning Voltage through some component is equal to the resistance it offers multiplied with the current through it. This can be adapted to other passive components that offer impedance. Resistors offer a means to impede the REAL part of the signal whereas capacitors and inductors offer a means to impede the IMAGINARY part of the signal. This involves complex numbers (not complex as in the adjective, but complex as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number ). Impedance takes all of this into account (both real and imaginary parts).
When deciding what impedance is best, one has to observe that the most efficient way to deliver power to some system is to impedance-match the source (amplifier) to the load (speaker): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_mismatch
Thank you for taking the time to post this. I have to be honest though, it's just way over my head.
Is there maybe an easier way to understand it? Like, let's say 10watt and 12 RMS is a good speaker?
Yep, I know what I need the speakers for at the moment. But I'd like to make the right choice.
So I just basically choose a speaker set with good reputation and high RMS value? That's it in a nutshell?
thanks.
Thanks, appreciate it![]()
I think they generally like to show PMPO value as a marketing trick...3000w PMPO sounds a heck load louder than 500w RMS cause most people would see 3000>500... and I think sn3rd explained RMS well,sigh just starting learning it at varsity so I'm over it now![]()
double post
Seems this thread could help a few people in future thenhappy about that.
Speakers are expensive though, I'll have to see when I truly can afford it![]()
It'd be great if ALL threads could help people in the future![]()
Pro.
Not even edited and you included a title for your double post.You know you can just delete when you click Edit.