Thanks for the objectivity...
And the only possible win outcome for Telkom is making the competitors life miserable. Bilateral relations cannot succeed if one side is determined to make it fail.
Well if one can show that there has been a concerted effort to resolve the detrimental behaviour and proper records are kept - it can be interpreted as anti-competitive behaviour and this could potentially be costly to Telkom.
Agreed
The ISPs have neither control over outcome nor choice of suppliers in the matter so one can't really hold them responsible.
Agree to some extent – if you do not have a choice, it is best to keep relationships, amenable and respectful.
At the end of the day it is a person doing the task, (they might not like it or be diligent, sometimes have no interest) however - if one can facilitate the task in a manner where it is less taxing for the individual and the individual is informed that his / her assistance is appreciated, it normally oils the process. (Ultimately your brand depends on an oiled process)
On the other hand the customer has a reasonable right to expect results.
Agree – a regular status update on the customer portal would have sufficed
Damn state sponsored monopolies create nothing but trouble & messy situations like these.
Well they are not going to disappear, while they contribute to the state coffers. There has been some interesting developments in other parts of the world, where the “BEE” strategy has been approached from a total different perspective. Where the industry has matured and all work together to find solutions as they realise it is in the industry and everyone's best interest. Per example; where private companies have trained stae employees.
You can only positively affect another’s behaviour or negotiate for that matter, when a high level of mutual respect and understanding is present.
***
Unfortunately, I did not provide the full context (other multiple issues and some not so thoughtful PM's ) in my initial post.