xrapidx
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2007
- Messages
- 40,310
Ordered one of these so long - it looks like its gotten quite a few positive reviews http://cgi.ebay.com/BP-40D-grip-for...7ab194790&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14#ht_4757wt_1282
Ordered one of these so long - it looks like its gotten quite a few positive reviews http://cgi.ebay.com/BP-40D-grip-for...7ab194790&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14#ht_4757wt_1282
Dude, get the real thing. I hear of too many problems with the 3rd party ones.
That looks like someone's photoshop dream. 15-85mm? The bodies of those two lenses look more like Sony's styling than Canon's. And the 7D body looks like a mix between xxxD and xxD lines. The rumours have been flying over a 7D for years, and it's never come true. Why 7 anyways? A 3D makes much more sense.
**sigh** stumbled on my own thread... Its now my turn to do this - and all the photographers my other half likes are well over R15,000
That looks like someone's photoshop dream. 15-85mm? The bodies of those two lenses look more like Sony's styling than Canon's. And the 7D body looks like a mix between xxxD and xxD lines. The rumours have been flying over a 7D for years, and it's never come true. Why 7 anyways? A 3D makes much more sense.
Ouch.**sigh** stumbled on my own thread... Its now my turn to do this - and all the photographers my other half likes are well over R15,000
Little bit off the mark there weren't youHa ha! I totally forgot about this - I was so wrong. And now I own one![]()
Little bit off the mark there weren't you![]()
Funny this thread should resurface now but according to this article the opposite it true. Unless there is a agreement in place the person commissioning the shoot has all the rights to the photos, not the photographer.That's very kind of you! Remember, the photographer retains intellectual and artistic rights to the photograph, unless he or she sells those rights to you. Paying for the photographer's services does not imply that you are paying for the copyright on the photos.
I'd love to know what you consider reasonable...
Where South African law differs from international law is in the line “commissioned photographs are owned by the commissioner (client)” This means freelance photographers have no rights to their work.
That's fair enough then. If you agree to those terms you have to abide by them.Interesting
The photographer she chose has a clause in the agreement stating that you may not give the photo's to anyone else unless otherwise agreed - it also says that if the photo's are published anywhere, the photographers address must be shown.
And that the photographer retains the rights to the photo's.
But fortunately this issue can be circumvented by mutual agreement even when it takes the form of a verbal agreement. The act allows for negotiation of these default terms, and consequently any agreement negotiated comes under contract law which then overrides the Copyright Law.