This is really very sad, more so for us ex Telkom employees that actually do know how things work!
(1) There are many of us who live close enough to node points where the DSLAMs, MSANs, ISANs whatever are installed whop DO NOT need to have their services "controlled" by the ASSIA system, who should be able to get systems set on Fastpath permanently.
(2) Who want to get their lines tested properly, by competent technical people and not by the normal call centre people who half the time just irritate the H out of us when we phone them
and they start giving us the normal run around.
It is way past pathetic!
![]()
Why is it necessary for users to have to pull the stunts on their own? Why can't we get to persons who can test lines properly and determine what the real problem is?
Why must we put up with anything but the best possible service on the line we have? Why can't we opt out of the LCD solutions if we choose to do so?
Why can't we push the limits on a line that may be theoretically out of range but if it works let it work? What is wrong here? We are not all sheep, who want to be labelled as dumb customers!
We are more than able to understand the compromises we are making and what to expect as a result.
The thing that made me give up was the fact that the tech that was attending to the fault keep on insisting the the line if fine and working, but he was never in my house to test the line from my house to the DB in the complex, this cable was patched before because it was damaged when a manhole cover fell in and did some damage.
I just find it sickening that I am so desperate that I am willing to pull my own cable and maintain telkoms network but pulling a cable from my house to the DB and patching it in myself.
I just get told sorry, more than 5km from the exchange nothing we can do, but why did I get a line syncing at 4905 for the first few months? if it was distance would this not have been a problem from day one when they did the installation?

