JustGadgets
Senior Member
9.68 secs for the 100m... WOW!!!![]()
Actually 9.69 secs
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
9.68 secs for the 100m... WOW!!!![]()
http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/meghan/Papers/whowinsv30.pdfWhile the simple population hypothesis does have explanatory power, it fails to adequately explain the distribution of medals across countries. We find significant evidence that other resources, national income in particular, are important for producing Olympic athletes. Interestingly, per capita income and population have very similar effects at the margin suggesting that total [Gross Domestic Product] GDP is the best predictor of national Olympic performance.
How 'Lightning' Bolt cost himself 0.14 seconds
Had the world record sprinter Usain Bolt not begun his chest-beating celebrations 20 metres before the finish of the Olympic 100 metres final in August he would have smashed his world record by a further 0.14 seconds, according to physicists who have analysed the race.
In relation to a topic brought up earlier in this discussion... This is a paper I came across on the relationship between medals and population and GDP.
http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/meghan/Papers/whowinsv30.pdf
While the simple population hypothesis does have explanatory power, it fails to adequately explain the distribution of medals across countries. We find significant evidence that other resources, national income in particular, are important for producing Olympic athletes. Interestingly, per capita income and population have very similar effects at the margin suggesting that total [Gross Domestic Product] GDP is the best predictor of national Olympic performance.