FiestaST
Honorary Master
Gender Construct 'R Us.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Actually that is the beginning.Male
Female
The End
I think the distinctions that exist are whether or not a person likes people of the same or opposite sex, but biologically and logically, they are what they had when they came out of the womb. Granted there are some differences like some men are very feminine and some woman are very masculine but again - what is between your legs is what you are. The rest are your choices.The question is incorrectly phrased. There are two definitions, where one refers to socially associated biological-sex attributions, and the other refers to biological sex. 'Gender' has been used to describe both for a very long time.
It's like getting into a war about whether or not 'Coke' is a fizzy drink or hard drug.
Sexual preference in partners is a distinction, but it's not a distinction specifically related to gender. There are a ton of publications and research that discuss gender in terms of behavior, appearance, performance, and other characteristics that don't relate to biological gender. The key consideration is that they're really saying "We're not talking about chromosomes or gonads here, but social characteristics", they just don't spell it out, which is why people who aren't aware think all trans people are claiming to be something they're not.I think the distinctions that exist are whether or not a person likes people of the same or opposite sex, but biologically and logically, they are what they had when they came out of the womb. Granted there are some differences like some men are very feminine and some woman are very masculine but again - what is between your legs is what you are. The rest are your choices.
Then why the insistence on using the word for "socially associated biological-sex attributions", why not use another word like "mood" or "feels"?The question is incorrectly phrased. There are two definitions, where one refers to socially associated biological-sex attributions, and the other refers to biological sex. 'Gender' has been used to describe both for a very long time.
It's like getting into a war about whether or not 'Coke' is a fizzy drink or hard drug.
It’s already baked into our language as is:Then why the insistence on using the word for "socially associated biological-sex attributions", why not use another word like "mood" or "feels".
It’s already baked into our language as is:
When you ask someone “Do you have any kids?”, they may typically reply back with, “Yes, two girls and a boy”.
What do you think the reply was trying to communicate? Their sex organs? The makeup of their 23rd pair of chromosomes? I doubt either of these. They are trying to communicate socially associated attributions of the biological genders. Specifically the experience of raising boys can be very different to raising girls in many ways. The person is answering with the gender of the children, but is definitely not referring to balls, wombs, or genes.
Uhm... No.It’s already baked into our language as is:
When you ask someone “Do you have any kids?”, they may typically reply back with, “Yes, two girls and a boy”.
What do you think the reply was trying to communicate? Their sex organs? The makeup of their 23rd pair of chromosomes? I doubt either of these. They are trying to communicate socially associated attributions of the biological genders. Specifically the experience of raising boys can be very different to raising girls in many ways. The person is answering with the gender of the children, but is definitely not referring to balls, wombs, or genes.
So when you answer that question, you believe you’re effectively answering, “I have a kid with a dick”, because that’s what they wanted know? That’s pretty weird, man.What a load of crap.
If somebody asks me about my offspring I say I have a boy. It has nothing to do with how I am raising him or some made up social construct. He has balls and the correct chromosomes to be classed as a male so he is, in fact, a boy.
That's pretty much it. He is a boy. He has a dick.So when you answer that question, you believe you’re effectively answering, “I have a kid with a dick”, because that’s what they wanted know? That’s pretty weird, man.
Actually they just want to know if they must use he/him or her/she. It's frowned up to check and in my opinion very bad manners.So when you answer that question, you believe you’re effectively answering, “I have a kid with a dick”, because that’s what they wanted know? That’s pretty weird, man.
Spoiler: they don’t actually want to know if your kid has a dick or not. (Edit: but if they do, you should probably call the police).That's pretty much it. He is a boy. He has a dick.
It's not that hard to understand.
He can like girls or boys or furries for all I care but he remains a boy.
Let me guess, you don't have kids?Spoiler: they don’t actually want to know if your kid has a dick or not.
Language is not always literal, and is clearly not literal in this case. If you can’t understand that, there’s really no more point in discussing this.
What sorcery is this ?Mist peiple

If you really believe that they’re interested in your kids’ genitals, you should call the police.Let me guess, you don't have kids?
Mist peiple don't want to know how they identify or as what gender you are trying to raise them. When people asks about your kids they mean it in the most literal sense they can. How many are boys and how many are girls.
Ignorance. The end.
Hermaphrodites exist.
Experts estimate that up to 1.7 percent of the population are born with intersex traits.
Ahhh.... so it's now a matter of degrees.So hardly a factor