Why Anonymous hackers taking on ISIS is a bad idea

This is not Anonymous. It is unofficial channel of widespread CIA (esp. SAD division), Mossad (read your own agency) operation. Through unofficial channels they can spread fear, unverified accusations or even reveal personal details of people they want to intimidate.
 
Last edited:
Erm, I think the writer is giving government agencies way too much credit. Also, worrying that Anonymous may cause such a dent that it hinders prosecution and evidence gives Anonymous too much credit.
 
Erm, I think the writer is giving government agencies way too much credit. Also, worrying that Anonymous may cause such a dent that it hinders prosecution and evidence gives Anonymous too much credit.

+1. The government would have a cache of the data they are going to use to prosecute anyways.
 
Anonymous have declared war on a lot of people. Does anybody still care about their idle threats
 
I sometimes use free wifi hotspots, but then again I don't openly call myself a hacker. #hackedbyWasabee
 
The author declined to mention that some "ISIS" sites hacked by Anonymous were actually false flag domains run by government. How embarrassing for the admins.
 
The author declined to mention that some "ISIS" sites hacked by Anonymous were actually false flag domains run by government. How embarrassing for the admins.
Just to make this 'hacking' story credible.
 
The author declined to mention that some "ISIS" sites hacked by Anonymous were actually false flag domains run by government. How embarrassing for the admins.
Lol
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter