Why should you ever settle for less than 10Mbps bandwidth?

Problem is Telkom is severely handicapped by politically appointed CEO's, and counterintuitively, politicians really are very low bandwidth types. It's accepted that most politicians generate a lot of traffic but usually the bulk of it comprises vaporware that they blow out their back ports. Politicains have a particular tendency to feedback their own crap which means less information is actually being transmitted over the wires. They are furthermore trained to filter out 'useless' information (such as how the real world works, or everything that don't conform to their world view) meaning their overall consumption of information is lower than average too. Some local politicians suffer from unacceptable packet loss as they have runaway processes like '700+corruptioncharges' and 'trustfund4tendaz' running all the time, which takes up a lot of processing power leaving much less capacity for information processing.

Either way you look at it, politicains seem to be bandwidth hogs while in fact they have a very low bandwidth profile - probably somewhere in the order of 384kbps.

Coincidence that that's the exact figure that Telkom has standardized on? I think not!
 
evilstebunny said:
Problem is Telkom is severely handicapped by politically appointed CEO's, and counterintuitively, politicians really are very low bandwidth types. It's accepted that most politicians generate a lot of traffic but usually the bulk of it comprises vaporware that they blow out their back ports. Politicains have a particular tendency to feedback their own crap which means less information is actually being transmitted over the wires. They are furthermore trained to filter out 'useless' information (such as how the real world works, or everything that don't conform to their world view) meaning their overall consumption of information is lower than average too. Some local politicians suffer from unacceptable packet loss as they have runaway processes like '700+corruptioncharges' and 'trustfund4tendaz' running all the time, which takes up a lot of processing power leaving much less capacity for information processing.

Either way you look at it, politicains seem to be bandwidth hogs while in fact they have a very low bandwidth profile - probably somewhere in the order of 384kbps.

Coincidence that that's the exact figure that Telkom has standardized on? I think not!
Click to expand...

rofl! Post of the day imo :)
 
evilstebunny FTW!

Only thing you missed is that some of them have severely limited processing capacity, and suffer memory loss too!
 
evilstebunny said:
Problem is Telkom is severely handicapped by politically appointed CEO's, and counterintuitively, politicians really are very low bandwidth types. It's accepted that most politicians generate a lot of traffic but usually the bulk of it comprises vaporware that they blow out their back ports. Politicains have a particular tendency to feedback their own crap which means less information is actually being transmitted over the wires. They are furthermore trained to filter out 'useless' information (such as how the real world works, or everything that don't conform to their world view) meaning their overall consumption of information is lower than average too. Some local politicians suffer from unacceptable packet loss as they have runaway processes like '700+corruptioncharges' and 'trustfund4tendaz' running all the time, which takes up a lot of processing power leaving much less capacity for information processing.

Either way you look at it, politicains seem to be bandwidth hogs while in fact they have a very low bandwidth profile - probably somewhere in the order of 384kbps.

Coincidence that that's the exact figure that Telkom has standardized on? I think not!
Click to expand...

Epic!

Pity my line is currently running at half a politician...
 
evilstebunny said:
Problem is Telkom is severely handicapped by politically appointed CEO's, and counterintuitively, politicians really are very low bandwidth types. It's accepted that most politicians generate a lot of traffic but usually the bulk of it comprises vaporware that they blow out their back ports. Politicains have a particular tendency to feedback their own crap which means less information is actually being transmitted over the wires. They are furthermore trained to filter out 'useless' information (such as how the real world works, or everything that don't conform to their world view) meaning their overall consumption of information is lower than average too. Some local politicians suffer from unacceptable packet loss as they have runaway processes like '700+corruptioncharges' and 'trustfund4tendaz' running all the time, which takes up a lot of processing power leaving much less capacity for information processing.

Either way you look at it, politicains seem to be bandwidth hogs while in fact they have a very low bandwidth profile - probably somewhere in the order of 384kbps.

Coincidence that that's the exact figure that Telkom has standardized on? I think not!
Click to expand...

classic ^5 ROFLMAO

SiriS said:
Epic!

Pity my line is currently running at half a politician...
Click to expand...

now we have a whole new system for measuring bandwidth :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X