WIFI DANGER *alert*

ROFL

/me looks nervously at his 2 wrt54gl routers next to him blinking their little green lights. :eek:
 
I saw something like this on the news where scientist were saying that wifi can have negative effects on people but british government denied this accusation.
 
On a serious note, it's true that WiFi works with microwaves and I am sure there are some health issues involved but a mobile phone can be just as if not more dangerous.

Modern life is full of these hidden dangers.

An external antenna takes some of this radiation away from the user.

In the old days the internal combustion engine seemed like a wonderfull idea, now greenhouse gasses makes us realize there are serious health issues involved.

Let's hope WiFi doesn't go that same route.
 
One of my routers has a 3g card in it :( Im in soooo much trouble. :(
 
I believe cellphone is more dangerous as cellphone companies are allowed to amp their equipment, where the law in SA has limitations towards the output power of wifi.
 
IMHO: More people die after tripping over network cables and falling against objects than from WiFi radiation...

Thus, WiFi is a safer solution than cabling :)
 
rebel998 said:
On a serious note, it's true that WiFi works with microwaves and I am sure there are some health issues involved but a mobile phone can be just as if not more dangerous.

Modern life is full of these hidden dangers.

An external antenna takes some of this radiation away from the user.

In the old days the internal combustion engine seemed like a wonderfull idea, now greenhouse gasses makes us realize there are serious health issues involved.

Let's hope WiFi doesn't go that same route.
Click to expand...

The sun, of which we are 3rd planet of, gives off all kinds od dangerous radiation. I think it should be banned.
 
bekdik said:
The sun, of which we are 3rd planet of, gives off all kinds od dangerous radiation. I think it should be banned.
Click to expand...

Not the same... stuies have shown that wireless radiation can cause problems in the brains of developing children - something to do with membranes not allowing things to pass through causing excessive levels of heavy metals in the brain - leading to brain damage and other problems.
Something on these lines:

http://www.naturalnews.com/022573.html
George Louis Carlo, who has a doctorate from the prestigious State University of New York, a law degree from George Washington University, and is a fellow of the American College of Epidemiology, has been a thorn in the side of the cellular phone industry. In 1993, he was granted $28 million by this industry and U.S. government agencies to study risks associated with cell phones. His initial results indicated that there were no problems. However, by 1999, Dr. Carlo had gained significantly more evidence indicating a risk to DNA, eye cancers, and brain tumors.

Carlo developed a theory that low frequency cell phone signals are harmful to cell function. This results in cells protecting themselves by stopping movement of nutrients and waste products through the cellular membrane. Inability to move wastes outside cells results in a buildup of toxins. This led him to suspect a connection with the enormous increase in autism. His hypothesis suggests that autistic children are less able to process heavy metals, so they remain in their bodies (primarily the brain) and cause neurological damage, including autism.

.
.
.
Back to Mercury

There is now no question that mercury, along with other heavy metals such as lead, is associated with autism. A study in a 2003 issue of the International Journal of Toxicology shows that the hair of autistic babies is significantly short of mercury and other heavy metals. At first, this might seem counterintuitive. However, it shows a clear connection with Carlo's hypothesis. Mercury exposure is linked to autism. The problem is the inability of some children to metabolize it. It's stuck inside their brain cells. Therefore, it isn't excreted, so little of it shows up in hair. In other words, autistic babies have less mercury in their hair, because it's still in their brains, causing neurological damage.
Tamara Mariea and George Carlo met a few years ago. They wondered if Carlo's theory that cell phones, along with other electromagnetic (EM) radiation, could be the reason that some children were not helped with chelation therapy - that EM radiation interferes with the ability of cells to excrete toxic heavy metals. So, they decided to test Carlo's hypothesis. They chose a severely autistic 10 year-old boy whose parents had tried every therapy they could find, including chelation, but to no benefit.

First, they removed toxins from the boy's home, including cell phones, pollutants of all kinds, all wireless equipment, and most electrical equipment. All EM radiation devices were removed from Mariea's clinic, or their radiation was shielded. No wireless devices were allowed to enter.

Thus, most of the boy's time was spent without EM radiation. Hair and stool analyses were done to track whether he was able to excrete heavy metals, and gradually, they did. Most thrilling, though, is that this boy, who had been able to say nothing more than "Yes" or "No" started to talk. At one point, he told his parents, "The noise has gone from my head."

Mariea and Carlo then set up a trial with 20 autistic children. This one was less strict, involving little more than spending at least four hours, two-to-three times a week, in the EM-free clinic. It did not require such limitations elsewhere and no chelation was done. In three months, analyses showed that heavy metals were beginning to be excreted by the children. This is reported in the Journal of the Australian College of Nutrition and Environmental Medicine in the November 2007 issue.

This is, of course, an early study. But it's very promising. There were other results that indicate the likelihood of the efficacy of removing EM radiation. Heavy metals were excreted in a specific order, from the lightest to the heaviest:

* beryllium

* aluminum

* copper

* antimony

* mercury

* lead

* uranium

There was no anticipation of such a result by any study participant, including those who designed it. The consistency of it makes it difficult to assume that the results were from a placebo effect.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
friend of mine worked on towers for couple of years and is now infertile.i do same type of work but lucky for me had kids already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X